Auditory Distance Presentation in an Urban Augmented Reality Environment

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Albrecht ◽  
Tapio Lokki
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 348
Author(s):  
Vincent Martin ◽  
Isabelle Viaud-Delmon ◽  
Olivier Warusfel

Audio-only augmented reality consists of enhancing a real environment with virtual sound events. A seamless integration of the virtual events within the environment requires processing them with artificial spatialization and reverberation effects that simulate the acoustic properties of the room. However, in augmented reality, the visual and acoustic environment of the listener may not be fully mastered. This study aims to gain some insight into the acoustic cues (intensity and reverberation) that are used by the listener to form an auditory distance judgment, and to observe if these strategies can be influenced by the listener’s environment. To do so, we present a perceptual evaluation of two distance-rendering models informed by a measured Spatial Room Impulse Response. The choice of the rendering methods was made to design stimuli categories in which the availability and reproduction quality of acoustic cues are different. The proposed models have been evaluated in an online experiment gathering 108 participants who were asked to provide judgments of auditory distance about a stationary source. To evaluate the importance of environmental cues, participants had to describe the environment in which they were running the experiment, and more specifically the volume of the room and the distance to the wall they were facing. It could be shown that these context cues had a limited, but significant, influence on the perceived auditory distance.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 14-14 ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Amp Up Your Treatment With Augmented Reality


2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
eve Coste-Maniere ◽  
Louai Adhami ◽  
Fabien Mourgues ◽  
Alain Carpentier

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Grier ◽  
H. Thiruvengada ◽  
S. R. Ellis ◽  
P. Havig ◽  
K. S. Hale ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 237 (10) ◽  
pp. 1225-1229
Author(s):  
Peter Szurman

ZusammenfassungEine der kontroversesten Diskussionen in der Netzhautchirurgie wird derzeit über den Stellenwert der intraoperativen optischen Kohärenztomografie (iOCT) geführt. Hintergrund ist der Wunsch, den 2-dimensionalen Fundusblick des Operateurs mit der geschichteten Tiefeninformation der OCT zu kombinieren, um eine Art 4-dimensionale „Augmented Reality“ (3-D plus Veränderung über die Zeit) zu erreichen. Dies soll feine Strukturen, die dem Blick des Operateurs bisher verborgen sind, sichtbar machen. Deshalb erscheint die Netzhautchirurgie prädestiniert für den Einsatz einer iOCT zu sein. Die große Hoffnung liegt darin, dass ein dynamisches Live-3-D-Bild mit Echtzeit-Feedback dem Operateur zusätzliche Informationen liefert und die Sicherheit verbessert. So faszinierend die iOCT-Technologie auf den ersten Blick ist, so enttäuscht sie doch im klinischen Alltag, gerade in der Makulachirurgie. Sie liefert nur selten Informationen, die ohne iOCT nicht erzielbar wären oder durch präoperative Diagnostik nicht in wesentlich besserer Qualität vorlägen. Hoffnungsvoll sind einige Sonderindikationen, die insbesondere die subretinale Chirurgie betreffen.


2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Pömer ◽  
L Angleitner Boubenizek ◽  
A Habelsberger ◽  
P Oppelt
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document