Chapter 4 Depositional geometry at selected locations around the basin

10.1144/m53.4 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Wilson

AbstractThis chapter includes 11 cross-sections and one well log profile to show the depositional geometry and setting in specific areas around the basin: the Saudi Arabia outcrop belt; the Rimthan Arch; and the eastern and central areas of the intrashelf basin in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Oman. These cross-sections are used to demonstrate the similarity and degree of continuity of the upper Dhruma Formation, the Tuwaiq Mountain Formation, the source rock, the Hanifa, Jubaila–Arab and Arab–Hith formations and depositional sequences in these different locations in the basin. They show the manner in which the underlying platform formed, the rim developed, the source rock was deposited and the basin progressively filled. The blanket deposition of the Arab-D anhydrite was followed by the Arab-C to Arab-A and Hith carbonate and evaporite sequences. The cross-sections provide the framework used in subsequent chapters to make a series of facies maps and other interpretative diagrams and cross-sections that summarize and, for some intervals, revise the interpretation of the settings and geological events that formed the Arabian Intrashelf Basin.

GeoArabia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed S. Al-Suwaidi ◽  
Sabah K. Aziz

ABSTRACT Carbonate reservoirs on the eastern flank of the Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian intrashelf basin in offshore Abu Dhabi had received little attention until commercial oil accumulations in structural traps were discovered in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In order to clarify the geometric and chronostratigraphic relationships of the Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian reservoirs, a multidisciplinary study (seismic, lithobiofacies, geochemistry, strontium isotope dating, and well-log data) was used to develop a sequence stratigraphic model. After deposition of the Callovian upper Araej Formation, a differentiated carbonate platform was established in the early Oxfordian in offshore and western onshore Abu Dhabi. Tectonic subsidence coupled with sea-level fluctuations controlled the geometry, deposition, and distribution of the lithofacies. These ranged from organic-rich, limy mudstones in the basinal area, to porous and permeable bioclastic packstones, grainstones, and dolomites in shallow waters on the eastern flank of the intrashelf basin. The upper Kimmeridgian Arab-D Member of the Arab Formation overlies the basinal deposits. Three third-order Depositional Sequences were identified in the offshore area. They are named according to their contained Maximum Flooding Surface; a fourth sequence is an intermediate unnamed Depositional Wedge. Depositional Sequence Jurassic 50 is of Oxfordian age and was deposited during transgressive and highstand periods. The lower Kimmeridgian Depositional Sequence Jurassic 60 is a well-defined lowstand system tract overlain by short-lived transgressive and highstand system tracts. Overlying Depositional Sequence Jurassic 60 is the Depositional Wedge. Finally, Depositional Sequence Jurassic 70 consists of transgressive and highstand system tracts developed on an undifferentiated platform that had localized depressions in the west. The best reservoir developments are in highstand bioclastic packstones and grainstones below the type-1 sequence boundaries that cap Depositional Sequences Jurassic 50 and Jurassic 60. The reservoir units have porosities greater than 20 percent and permeabilities of more than 1,000 milliDarcies. The basinal facies of Depositional Sequence Jurassic 50 have the best source-rock potential in the intrashelf basin.


10.1144/m53.5 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Wilson

AbstractThis is the first of two chapters in which the data presented in the first four chapters of this Memoir are reviewed and interpreted. A summary cross-section across the basin from the Saudi outcrop to Abu Dhabi and the Tethyan margin is used to summarize the regional setting and sequences as interpreted in this Memoir. The key points illustrated by the summary cross-section are stated and discussed in the first part of this chapter. Two different interpretations for the eastern margin of the intrashelf basin are reviewed. In the first of these interpretations, the margin with the deeper waters of the Tethys Ocean shelf is adjacent to the intrashelf basin rim in Abu Dhabi, whereas in the second, preferred in this Memoir, a broad, shallow Tethyan shelf platform (200–300 km wide) extends from the intrashelf basin rim to the Tethys continental shelf edge. The implications of Late Jurassic exposure and erosion on the adjacent Tethyan shelf are discussed. The development of the Arabian Intrashelf Basin during the Callovian–late Oxfordian (the Tuwaiq Mountain Formation, the source rock and the Hanifa intervals and associated sequences) is interpreted and discussed with illustrations, including step-by-step facies maps. The interpretation integrates depositional, eustatic and tectonic factors in the evolution of the intrashelf basin. The interpretation in this Memoir is that the Arabian Intrashelf Basin began with isostatic and extensional subsidence on top of a broad Dhruma Atash Member platform, which had largely filled the accommodation space up to the wave base and to near sea-level. It developed fully into an intrashelf basin during the deposition of the Callovian Tuwaiq sequence, with rising sea-levels coincident with a productive shallow water carbonate factory resulting in a rim of shallow water carbonate. An end-Callovian to early Oxfordian lowstand terminated the Tuwaiq sequence on the basin rim. During the lowstand, restricted conditions in the basin deposited the rich Lower Hanifa source rock as a lowstand systems tract. As more normal conditions returned in a subsequent sequence, the source rock facies graded upwards into Hanifa reservoir facies, which partially filled the basin. Hanifa progradation was terminated by another lowstand during which a subaqueous gypsum/anhydrite marker bed was deposited in at least part of the remnant basin. Earlier interpretations of these sequences are also discussed.


GeoArabia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frans S.P. van Buchem ◽  
Bernard Pittet ◽  
Heiko Hillgärtner ◽  
Jürgen Grötsch ◽  
Abdullah I. Al Mansouri ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT A regional sequence stratigraphic model for the Kharaib and Shu’aiba formations (Barremian, Aptian) is proposed based on outcrop and subsurface transects in Oman and the United Arab Emirates. The model shows distinct variations in depositional facies and geometrical patterns in relation to third-order sequences. The sedimentary systems evolved from a low-angle carbonate ramp (Kharaib Formation), to an organic-rich intrashelf basin surrounded by carbonate platforms (Hawar Member and Lower Shu’aiba), to a clay-dominated sedimentation restricted to the intrashelf basin (Upper Shu’aiba). Eustatic sea-level changes and, to a lesser extent, local tectonic controls influenced the development of the systems. This high-resolution sequence stratigraphic model has implications for both exploration and production strategies. This study presents a revised sedimentological facies interpretation based on detailed outcrop observations with geological constraints provided by a regional well-log correlation from Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Time control was provided by biostratigraphy (including new nannofossil data), and carbon isotope stratigraphy. Four third-order depositional sequences bounded by regional exposure surfaces were defined that are composed of at least two higher-order sequences (fourth- and fifth-order). Depositional sequences I and II have a flat ramp setting. The typical ecological succession was orbitolinid and/or miliolid wackestone-packstone deposited in a low-energy, inner ramp environment during early transgression; a mixed-fauna mudstone-wackestone in an open lagoon during maximum flooding and early highstand; and a rudist/miliolid wackestone-packstone-grainstone-framestone of the succeeding late highstand in a high-energy, inner- to mid-ramp environment. The doubling in thickness of the sequences from Oman to Abu Dhabi is attributed to differential subsidence. The Sequence III succession was somewhat similar, but differences were caused by the creation of the intrashelf Bab Basin, and by well-developed microbial boundstones. The basin morphology was primarily due to differential accumulation rates and tectonism was of only minor importance. Rapidly aggrading and backstepping microbial boundstones formed the platform, whereas condensed sedimentation and the accumulation of carbonate source rocks occurred in the basin. Highstand deposits were primarily grainy, high-energy rudist-dominated facies. The sequence ended with a forced regressive wedge along the basin margins. Sequence IV was restricted to the Bab Basin and sedimentation consisted of a clay-rich infill phase. At that time, the Oman and Abu Dhabi platforms were exposed on both sides of the basin. Nannofossils dated this major relative fall in sea level to the early-late Aptian.


1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Galin ◽  
D. Guerreau ◽  
M. Lefort ◽  
X. Tarrago

The work of multilayer glass structures for central and eccentric compression and bending are considered. The substantiation of the chosen research topic is made. The description and features of laminated glass for the structures investigated, their characteristics are presented. The analysis of the results obtained when testing for compression, compression with bending, simple bending of models of columns, beams, samples of laminated glass was made. Overview of the types and nature of destruction of the models are presented, diagrams of material operation are constructed, average values of the resistance of the cross-sections of samples are obtained, the table of destructive loads is generated. The need for development of a set of rules and guidelines for the design of glass structures, including laminated glass, for bearing elements, as well as standards for testing, rules for assessing the strength, stiffness, crack resistance and methods for determining the strength of control samples is emphasized. It is established that the strength properties of glass depend on the type of applied load and vary widely, and significantly lower than the corresponding normative values of the strength of heat-strengthened glass. The effect of the connecting polymeric material and manufacturing technology of laminated glass on the strength of the structure is also shown. The experimental values of the elastic modulus are different in different directions of the cross section and in the direction perpendicular to the glass layers are two times less than along the glass layers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman N. Lee ◽  
Alexey A. Lyubyakin ◽  
Vyacheslav A. Stotsky

Abstract Using modern multiloop calculation methods, we derive the analytical expressions for the total cross sections of the processes e−γ →$$ {e}^{-}X\overline{X} $$ e − X X ¯ with X = μ, γ or e at arbitrary energies. For the first two processes our results are expressed via classical polylogarithms. The cross section of e−γ → e−e−e+ is represented as a one-fold integral of complete elliptic integral K and logarithms. Using our results, we calculate the threshold and high-energy asymptotics and compare them with available results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Elatrash ◽  
Mohammad A. Abdelwahhab ◽  
Hamdalla A. Wanas ◽  
Samir I. El-Naggar ◽  
Hasan M. Elshayeb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document