scholarly journals About this title - Sweden: Lithotectonic Framework, Tectonic Evolution and Mineral Resources

10.1144/m50 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. NP-NP ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Tectonic Evolution ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Mineral Resources ◽  
Crystalline Rock ◽  
Advanced Students ◽  
Geological Units ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Crystalline Rock Mass ◽  
Different Parts

The solid rock mass of Sweden forms a natural field laboratory revealing insight into the westward growth and reworking of one of the planet's ancient continental nuclei. Three major geological units are exposed in different parts of the country: the western part of the Fennoscandian Shield, mainly sedimentary rocks deposited on this crystalline rock mass and the Caledonide orogen. This volume synthesizes the tectonic evolution of Sweden over more than 2500 million years from the Neoarchean to the Neogene. Following an introduction describing the lithotectonic framework of the country and the organization of the volume, the tectonic evolution is addressed essentially chronologically. Different phases of intracratonic rifting, accretionary orogeny, continent–continent collisional orogeny and platformal sedimentation are identified. Sweden is one of Europe's major suppliers of metals, and the country's mineral resources are also presented in the context of the lithotectonic framework. Sweden: Lithotectonic Framework, Tectonic Evolution and Mineral Resources has been designed to interest a professional geoscientific audience and advanced students of Earth Sciences.

A late Cisuralian (early Permian) brachiopod fauna from the Taungnyo Group in the Zwekabin Range, eastern Myanmar and its biostratigraphic, paleobiogeographic, and tectonic implications

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Hai-peng Xu ◽  
Kyi Pyar Aung ◽  
Yi-chun Zhang ◽  
G.R. Shi ◽  
Fu-long Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tectonic Evolution ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Water Environment ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Early Permian ◽  
The North ◽  
Southern Thailand ◽  
Brachiopod Fauna ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Different Parts

Abstract The tectonic evolution of the Sibumasu Block during the Permian remains controversial, and Permian faunas and their paleobiogeographic affinities provide some insight into its paleogeographic and tectonic evolutionary histories. In this paper, a new brachiopod fauna dominated by Spinomartinia prolifica Waterhouse, 1981 is described from the uppermost part of the Taungnyo Group in the Zwekabin Range, eastern Myanmar. This brachiopod fauna includes 23 species and its age is well constrained as late Kungurian by the associated conodonts, i.e., Vjalovognathus nicolli Yuan et al., 2016 and Mesogondolella idahoensis (Youngquist, Hawley, and Miller, 1951), contrary to the late Sakmarian age given to the same brachiopod faunas previously reported from southern Thailand and Malaysia. Based on comprehensive comparisons of the Cisuralian brachiopod faunas and other data in different parts of the Sibumasu Block, we consider that they are better subdivided into two independent stratigraphic assemblages, i.e., the lower (earlier) Bandoproductus monticulus-Spirelytha petaliformis Assemblage of a Sakmarian to probably early Artinskian age, and the upper (younger) Spinomartinia prolifica-Retimarginifera alata Assemblage of a late Kungurian age. The former assemblage is a typical cold-water fauna, mainly composed of Gondwanan-type genera, e.g., Bandoproductus Jin and Sun, 1981, Spirelytha Fredericks, 1924, and Sulciplica Waterhouse, 1968. The latter assemblage is strongly characterized by an admixture of both Cathaysian and Gondwanan elements, as well as some genera restricted to the Cimmerian continents. Notably, the spatial distribution pattern of these two separate brachiopod assemblages varies distinctly. The Sakmarian cold-water brachiopod faunas have been found in association with glacial-marine diamictites throughout the Sibumasu Block including both the Irrawaddy and Sibuma blocks. In contrast, the Kungurian biogeographically mixed brachiopod faunas are only recorded in the Irrawaddy Block, unlike the Sibuma Block that contains a contemporaneous paleotropical Tethyan fusuline fauna. Thus, it appears likely that by the end of Cisuralian (early Permian), the Sibumasu Block comprised the Irrawaddy Block in the south with cool climatic conditions, and the Sibuma Block in the north with a temperate to warm-water environment, separated by the incipient Thai-Myanmar Mesotethys.

scholarly journals Comprehensive geological dataset describing a crystalline rock mass for hydraulic stimulation experiments

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Krietsch ◽  
Joseph Doetsch ◽  
Nathan Dutler ◽  
Mohammadreza Jalali ◽  
Valentin Gischig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Crystalline Rock ◽  
Hydraulic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Experiments ◽  
Crystalline Rock Mass

scholarly journals Hydraulic fracture propagation in a heterogeneous stress field in a crystalline rock mass

Solid Earth ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1877-1904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Dutler ◽  
Benoît Valley ◽  
Valentin Gischig ◽  
Linus Villiger ◽  
Hannes Krietsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Shear Zone ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Fracture Propagation ◽  
Crystalline Rock ◽  
Ductile Shear Zone ◽  
Injection Point ◽  
Ductile Shear ◽  
Crystalline Rock Mass ◽  
Injection Pressures

Abstract. As part of the In-situ Stimulation and Circulation (ISC) experiment, hydraulic fracturing (HF) tests were conducted in a moderately fractured crystalline rock mass at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS), Switzerland. The aim of these injection tests was to improve our understanding of processes associated with high-pressure fluid injection. A total of six HF experiments were performed in two inclined boreholes; the surrounding rock mass was accessed with 12 observation boreholes, which allows for the high-resolution monitoring of fracture fluid pressure, strain, and microseismicity in an exceptionally well-characterized rock mass. A similar injection protocol was used for all six experiments to investigate the complexity of the fracture propagation processes. At the borehole scale, these processes involved newly created tensile fractures intersecting the injection interval, while at the cross-hole scale, the natural network of fractures dominated the propagation process. The six HF experiments can be divided into two groups based on their injection location (i.e., south or north to a brittle–ductile shear zone), their similarity of injection pressures, and their response to deformation and pressure propagation. The injection tests performed in the south connect upon propagation to the brittle–ductile shear zone. Thus, the shear zone acts as a dominant drain and a constant pressure boundary. The experiments executed north of the shear zone show smaller injection pressures and larger backflow during bleed-off phases. From a seismic perspective, the injection tests show high variability in seismic response independently of the location of injection. For two injection experiments, we observe reorientation of the seismic cloud as the fracture propagated away from the wellbore. In both cases, the main propagation direction is normal to the minimum principal stress direction. The reorientation during propagation is interpreted to be related to a strong stress heterogeneity and the intersection of natural fractures striking differently than the propagating hydraulic fracture. The seismic activity was limited to about 10 m of radial distance from the injection point. In contrast, strain and pressure signals reach further into the rock mass, indicating that the process zone around the injection point is larger than the zone illuminated by seismic signals. Furthermore, strain signals indicate not just single fracture openings but also the propagation of multiple fractures. Transmissivities of injection intervals increase about 2–4 orders of magnitudes.

scholarly journals Hydraulic fracture propagation in a heterogeneous stress field in a crystalline rock mass

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Dutler ◽  
Benoît Valley ◽  
Valentin Gischig ◽  
Linus Villiger ◽  
Hannes Krietsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Shear Zone ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Fracture Propagation ◽  
Crystalline Rock ◽  
Ductile Shear Zone ◽  
Injection Point ◽  
Ductile Shear ◽  
Crystalline Rock Mass ◽  
Injection Pressures

Abstract. As part of the In-situ Stimulation and Circulation (ISC) experiment, hydraulic fracturing (HF) tests were conducted in a moderately fractured crystalline rock mass at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS), Switzerland. The aim of these injection tests was to improve our understanding of processes associated with high-pressure fluid injection. A total of six HF experiments were performed in two inclined boreholes, where the surrounding rock mass was accessed with twelve observation boreholes, which allow high-resolution monitoring of fracture fluid pressure, strain and micro-seismicity in an exceptionally well-characterized rock mass. A similar injection protocol was used for all six experiments to investigate the complexity of the fracture propagation processes. At the borehole scale, these processes involved newly created tensile fractures intersecting the injection interval while at the cross-hole scale, the natural network of fractures dominated the propagation process. The six HF experiments can be divided into two groups based on their injection location (i.e., south or north to a brittle ductile shear zone), their similarity of injection pressures and their response to deformation and pressure propagation. The injection tests performed in the south connect upon propagation to the brittle ductile shear zone. Thus, the shear zone acts as a dominant drain and a constant pressure boundary. The experiments executed north of the shear zone, show smaller injection pressures and larger backflow during bleed-off phases. From a seismic perspective, the injection tests show high variability in seismic response independent of the location of injection. For two injection experiments, we observe re-orientation of the seismic cloud as the fracture propagated away from the wellbore. In both cases, the main propagation direction is normal to the minimum principal stress direction. The re-orientation during propagation is interpreted to be related to a strong stress heterogeneity and the intersection of natural fractures striking different than the propagating hydraulic fracture. The seismic activity was limited to about 10 m radial distance from the injection point. In contrast, strain and pressure signals reach further into the rock mass indicating that the process zone around the injection point is larger than the zone illuminated by seismic signals. Furthermore, strain signals indicate not just single fracture openings but also the propagation of multiple fractures. Transmissivities of injection intervals increase about 2–4 orders of magnitudes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document