scholarly journals Pion Exchange Mechanism for ( +, 2p) Reactions

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-577
Author(s):  
B. R. Wienke
Keyword(s):  
Pion Exchange ◽  
Exchange Mechanism

Two-Pion Exchange Mechanism inK+NScattering

1961 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 1550-1552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pion Exchange ◽  
Exchange Mechanism

Evidence for deviations from one-pion exchange mechanism in ϱ- production

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 709-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.R. Blieden ◽  
M.N. Focacci ◽  
L. Dubal ◽  
W. Kienzle ◽  
F. Lefèbvres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pion Exchange ◽  
Exchange Mechanism

scholarly journals Secure and Efficient Key Exchange Mechanism for Heterogeneous Connected Objects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofiane Aissani ◽  
Tarek Fettioune ◽  
Nafaa Maizia ◽  
Mohamed Mohammedi ◽  
Mawloud Omar
Keyword(s):  
Key Exchange ◽  
Exchange Mechanism

Patients' Perceptions of Different Information Exchange Mechanisms: An Exploratory Study in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 162-178
Author(s):  
Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
The United States ◽  
Exchange Mechanism ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Security Risks ◽  
Direct Exchange

Abstract Background Patients may seek health care services from various providers during treatment. These providers could serve in a network (affiliated) or practice separately (unaffiliated). Thus, using secure and reliable health information exchange (HIE) mechanisms would be critical to transfer sensitive personal health information (PHI) across distances. Studying patients' perceptions and opinions about exchange mechanisms could help health care providers build more complete HIEs' databases and develop robust privacy policies, consent processes, and patient education programs. Objectives Due to the exploratory nature of this study, we aim to shed more light on public perspectives (benefits, concerns, and risks) associated with the four data exchange practices in the health care sector. Methods In this study, we compared public perceptions and expectations regarding four common types of exchange mechanisms used in the United States (i.e., traditional, direct, query-based, patient-mediated exchange mechanisms). Traditional is an exchange through fax, paper mailing, or phone calls, direct is a provider-to-provider exchange, query-based is sharing patient data with a central repository, and patient-mediated is an exchange mechanism in which patients can access data and monitor sharing. Data were collected from 1,624 subjects using an online survey to examine the benefits, risks, and concerns associated with the four exchange mechanisms from patients' perspectives. Results Findings indicate that several concerns and risks such as privacy concerns, security risks, trust issues, and psychological risks are raised. Besides, multiple benefits such as access to complete information, communication improvement, timely and convenient information sharing, cost-saving, and medical error reduction are highlighted by respondents. Through consideration of all risks and benefits associated with the four exchange mechanisms, the direct HIE mechanism was selected by respondents as the most preferred mechanism of information exchange among providers. More than half of the respondents (56.18%) stated that overall they favored direct exchange over the other mechanisms. 42.70% of respondents expected to be more likely to share their PHI with health care providers who implemented and utilized a direct exchange mechanism. 43.26% of respondents believed that they would support health care providers to leverage a direct HIE mechanism for sharing their PHI with other providers. The results exhibit that individuals expect greater benefits and fewer adverse effects from direct HIE among health care providers. Overall, the general public sentiment is more in favor of direct data transfer. Our results highlight that greater public trust in exchange mechanisms is required, and information privacy and security risks must be addressed before the widespread implementation of such mechanisms. Conclusion This exploratory study's findings could be interesting for health care providers and HIE policymakers to analyze how consumers perceive the current exchange mechanisms, what concerns should be addressed, and how the exchange mechanisms could be modified to meet consumers' needs.

Effectiveness of Calcium Deficiency in Nanosized Hydroxyapatite for Removal of Fe(II), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Cr(VI) Ions from Aqueous Solutions

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 17-27
Author(s):  
Van Dat Doan ◽  
Van Thuan Le ◽  
Hoang Sinh Le ◽  
Dinh Hien Ta ◽  
Hoai Thuong Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Ion Exchange ◽  
Aqueous Solutions ◽  
Calcium Deficiency ◽  
Exchange Mechanism ◽  
Precipitation Method ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Bet Method ◽  
Langmuir Isotherm Model

In this work, nanosized calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (nCDHA) was synthesized by the precipitation method, and then utilized as an adsorbent for removal of Fe (II), Cu (II), Ni (II) and Cr (VI) ions from aqueous solutions after characterizing it by various techniques as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and BET method. A possible structure of synthesized nCDHA was proposed. The adsorption study indicated that the adsorption equilibrium is well fitted with Langmuir isotherm model with the maximum adsorption capacities followed the order of Fe (II) > Cu (II) > Ni (II) > Cr (VI) with the values of 137.23, 128.02, 83.19 and 2.92 mg/g, respectively. The ion-exchange mechanism was dominant for the adsorption of metal ions onto nCDHA at initial metal concentrations lower than 0.01 mol/L. Along with the ion-exchange mechanism, there was an additional precipitation occurred on the surface of nCDHA in the case of Fe (II) and Cu (II) at initial concentrations higher than 0.01 mol/L.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document