On the Influence of the Packing on the Atomic Scattering Factor Based on the Thomas-Fermi Theory

1955 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 753-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwai Umeda ◽  
Yasuo Tomishima
1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (42) ◽  
pp. 8089-8098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Zhangcheng ◽  
Zhao Zongyan ◽  
Guo Changlin ◽  
Zhou Shengming ◽  
Tomoe Fukamachi ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-557
Author(s):  
J. F. C. Baker ◽  
M. Hart ◽  
J. Helliar

Using the newly developed method of dynamical interference between anomalously transmitted waves in a crystal containing a non-diffracting zone1 , we have measured the real part of the atomic scattering factor for germanium at the value of sin θ/λ corresponding to the 220 Bragg reflection. The result, f0 = 23.79 ± 0.08 electron units is in excellent agreement with values obtained in perfect crystal intensity measurements 2,3 and from triple crystal rocking curve studies 4,5 but significantly differs from the value obtained using Pendellösung fringes 3. Finally, we seek to assess the reliability of each method by comparison with the corresponding results for silicon, concluding that the error probably lies in the Pendellösung result.


1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 5420-5421
Author(s):  
M. S. Wang ◽  
Sheau-Huey Chia

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Ahmed Raheem Ahmed ◽  
, Muhsin Hasan Ali

In the present study, we calculated the imaginary part of the x-ray scattering factor of nickel based on the principles of quantum mechanics to find a wave function that describes the electronic state of atoms by approximate methods, observed the study suggested that in both low energy values , and at high energy values , the imaginary part is approximately zero, this means that the electrons are intensely connected to the atom, where in the spectrum the photon energies are approximately equal to the electron bonding energy  we note the study pointed out that the imaginary part of the atomic scattering factor become  prominent and the electron becomes highly absorbent, the relative accuracy varies within range (0.03-0.22)%, and there was also a good agreement between the behavior we obtained for the imaginary part of the atomic scattering factor and the behavior that was calculated using other models.    http://dx.doi.org/10.25130/tjps.23.2018.171


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document