Handbook on Smart Battery Cell Manufacturing

10.1142/12511 ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Peter Birke ◽  
Max Weeber ◽  
Michael Oberle
Procedia CIRP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Thomitzek ◽  
Nicolas von Drachenfels ◽  
Felipe Cerdas ◽  
Christoph Herrmann ◽  
Sebastian Thiede

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1900136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem Turetskyy ◽  
Sebastian Thiede ◽  
Matthias Thomitzek ◽  
Nicolas von Drachenfels ◽  
Till Pape ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (07-08) ◽  
pp. 486-489
Author(s):  
Jürgen Fleischer ◽  
Florian Kößler ◽  
Julia Sawodny ◽  
Tobias Storz ◽  
Philipp Gönnheimer ◽  
...  

Die industrielle Batteriezellfertigung ist geprägt durch starre Produktionssysteme für die Massenfertigung. Die Fertigung anwendungsspezifischer Zellen im geringen bis mittleren Stückzahlsegment erfolgt derzeit kostenintensiv in einer Werkstattfertigung. Basierend auf standardisierten Roboterzellen und einer flexiblen Steuerungsarchitektur wird ein Konzept zur hoch automatisierten material-, format- und stückzahlflexiblen Batteriezellfertigung beschrieben.   Industrial battery cell production is characterized by rigid production systems for mass production. The production of application-specific cells in a low to medium quantity segment is currently performed by cost-intensive workshop production. Based on standardized robotic cells and a flexible control architecture, a concept for highly automated battery cell production that is flexible in terms of material, format and number of units is described.


Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 531-536
Author(s):  
Julian Grimm ◽  
Ekrem Köse ◽  
Max Weeber ◽  
Alexander Sauer ◽  
Kai Peter Birke

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 1215-1220
Author(s):  
Jacob Wessel ◽  
Artem Turetskyy ◽  
Olaf Wojahn ◽  
Tim Abraham ◽  
Christoph Herrmann

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Moldovan ◽  
Jaeyoo Choi ◽  
Youngwoo Choo ◽  
Won-Sik Kim ◽  
Yoon Hwa

AbstractLaser three-dimensional (3D) manufacturing technologies have gained substantial attention to fabricate 3D structured electrochemical rechargeable batteries. Laser 3D manufacturing techniques offer excellent 3D microstructure controllability, good design flexibility, process simplicity, and high energy and cost efficiencies, which are beneficial for rechargeable battery cell manufacturing. In this review, notable progress in development of the rechargeable battery cells via laser 3D manufacturing techniques is introduced and discussed. The basic concepts and remarkable achievements of four representative laser 3D manufacturing techniques such as selective laser sintering (or melting) techniques, direct laser writing for graphene-based electrodes, laser-induced forward transfer technique and laser ablation subtractive manufacturing are highlighted. Finally, major challenges and prospects of the laser 3D manufacturing technologies for battery cell manufacturing will be provided.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
Max Weeber ◽  
Johannes Wanner ◽  
Philipp Schlegel ◽  
Kai Peter Birke ◽  
Alexander Sauer

Batteries ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Asanthi Jinasena ◽  
Odne Stokke Burheim ◽  
Anders Hammer Strømman

The increasing use of electric vehicle batteries in the world has a significant impact on both society and the environment. Thus, there is a need for the availability of transparent information on resource allocation. Battery manufacturing process details in this regard are not available in academia or the public. The available energy data on manufacturing has a high variation. Furthermore, different process steps have different energy and material demands. A process model can benchmark the energy usage, provide detailed process data, and compare various cell productions which in turn can be used in life-cycle assessment studies to reduce the variation and provide directions for improvements. Therefore, a cell manufacturing model is developed for the calculation of energy and material demands for different battery types, plant capacities, and process steps. The model consists of the main process steps, machines, intermediate products and building service units. Furthermore, the results are validated using literature values. For a case study of a 2 GWh plant that produces prismatic NMC333 cells, the total energy requirement on a theoretical and optimal basis is suggested to be 44.6Whinproduction/Whcellcapacity. This energy consumption in producing batteries is dominated by electrode drying, and dry room. Energy usage for a variety of cell types for a similar plant capacity shows that the standard deviation in the results is low (47.23±13.03Wh/Wh).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document