scholarly journals 15N signatures do not reflect body condition in Arctic ground squirrels

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 1373-1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ben-David ◽  
C J McColl ◽  
R Boonstra ◽  
T J Karels

Studies using stable-isotope analysis documented an enrichment in δ15N values in nutritionally stressed animals. Investigators suggested that changes in δ15N values measured in urine, hair, and blood may be a good indicator of lean-tissue losses. During our investigations into the effects of population density on body condition and reproduction of female Arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii plesius) near Kluane Lake, Yukon, Canada, we examined the relations between body condition and δ15N values. Data obtained from 20 livetrapped female ground squirrels suggested that reproductive females from a population with moderate density and low food availability experienced a reduction in body condition, as indicated by mass loss and changes in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and glucose concentrations. In contrast, those from a population that failed to reproduce successfully and had high density and low food availability experienced no nutritional stress. Similarly, those females from a high-density population with high food availability (i.e., supplemented food) that reproduced successfully suffered no noticeable nutritional stress. In contrast to our prediction, δ15N values did not show a decline with increasing body mass, and animals in poor and excellent body condition had similar δ15N values. In addition, female ground squirrels from the same group with access to similar types of food (natural or supplemented) and with similar body masses, BUN, and blood glucose concentrations showed a difference of up to 1.8‰ in δ15N values. Thus, our results suggest that the ecological process (i.e., diet selection) may have obscured the physiological one (i.e., recycling of nitrogen). Therefore, we recommend that field ecologists studying animal diets using stable-isotope analysis use alternative techniques when attempting to evaluate the body condition of their subjects.

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 715-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koetsu Kon ◽  
Naoya Kawakubo ◽  
Jyun-Ichi Aoki ◽  
Prasert Tongnunui ◽  
Ken-Ichi Hayashizaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 172 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-226
Author(s):  
Brittany S. Walter ◽  
Sharon N. DeWitte ◽  
Tosha Dupras ◽  
Julia Beaumont

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery R. Werner ◽  
Charles J. Krebs ◽  
Scott A. Donker ◽  
Michael J. Sheriff

Body condition of animals influences the likelihood of surviving harsh environmental conditions, successfully reproducing, and resisting disease. The sum of these individual components of fitness, in turn, have consequences for the growth and persistence of wildlife populations. Here we compared the body mass and condition of adult female arctic ground squirrels (Urocitellus parryii plesius (Osgood, 1900)), an obligate hibernator, in source and sink habitats. We tested the hypothesis that adult females would be in poorer condition in the boreal forest than in adjacent meadows. We found that, during spring, postpartum females in forests weighed less (405 ± 7 vs. 437 ± 11 g; mean ± SE) and were in poorer condition (mean (±SE) residual of mass over structural size = −11.0 ± 10.2 vs. 20.5 ± 6.1 g) compared with females in meadow-source habitat. However, by the onset of entrance into hibernation in August, forest squirrels had reached parity with meadow squirrels and no difference was found in mass (519 ± 13 vs. 520 ± 15 g; mean ± SE) or condition (residual index = −0.01 ± 0.01 vs. 0.03 ± 0.01; mean ± SE). We suggest that for squirrels in formerly occupied boreal forests, (i) poor spring body condition decreased reproductive success and (ii) achieving compensatory growth, via increased foraging, comes at the costs of higher predation risk. These costs likely contributed to the recent local extinction of arctic ground squirrels in boreal forest habitat.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Short ◽  
Gottfried P. Kibelka ◽  
Robert H. Byrne ◽  
David Hollander

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mortensen ◽  
◽  
Nathan D. Stansell ◽  
Byron A. Steinman ◽  
Gilles Y. Brocard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andreas Hilkert ◽  
John K. Böhlke ◽  
Stanley J. Mroczkowski ◽  
Kyle L. Fort ◽  
Konstantin Aizikov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document