Communal nesting in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): an evaluation of costs and benefits based on patterns of dispersal and settlement

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty McGuire ◽  
Lowell L. Getz

We evaluated costs and benefits of group nesting in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) by examining dispersal from communal nests. Nests at which dispersal occurred did not differ in size from those at which no dispersal was recorded, and most animals did not exhibit declines in body mass prior to dispersal. Of those animals which left communal groups that contained at least one potential mate, half left groups at which level of competition for mates was judged to be low as opposed to medium or high. Our data do not support competition for food or mates as important costs of group nesting. One probable cost to individuals living in family groups is lack of mating opportunity; about one-third of all dispersers were from groups composed solely of family members. Several of our findings suggest that energy conservation is not the primary reason for communal nesting in prairie voles. Reductions in winter group size typically did not precipitate dispersal, and most dispersers that settled into a nest in winter joined groups which were smaller than the groups they had left. Dispersal did not increase during snow cover. Benefits of group nesting in natural populations of prairie voles remain to be identified.

Ethology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (9) ◽  
pp. 675-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Keane ◽  
Frank R. Castelli ◽  
Haley Davis ◽  
Thomas O. Crist ◽  
Nancy G. Solomon

1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lowell L. Getz ◽  
Betty McGuire

We describe factors related to the formation, composition, and persistence of communal groups in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Communal groups formed by the addition of philopatric offspring and unrelated adults to male – female pair and single-female breeding units. Although unrelated adults did not join a group until at least two philopatric offspring 30 days of age were present, there was no relationship between the presence of reproductively active philopatric offspring of the opposite sex and joining of unrelated adults. Most adults that joined a group were reproductive when they joined. Reproductive activation of philopatric offspring was not related to the joining of unrelated adults. During the breeding period all communal groups included 1 or more reproductive adults of each sex; in at least 75% of the groups, 2 or more adults of each sex were reproductive. There was no relationship between low temperature, snow cover, or population density and formation of communal groups. Dissolution of communal groups was not related to reproductive activation of residents.


Neuroscience ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 369 ◽  
pp. 292-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Guoynes ◽  
T.C. Simmons ◽  
G.M. Downing ◽  
S. Jacob ◽  
M. Solomon ◽  
...  

Mammalia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Keane ◽  
Phillip J. Long ◽  
Yasmeen Fleifil ◽  
Nancy G. Solomon

AbstractBehavioral changes that reduce the risk of predation in response to predator-derived odor cues are widespread among mammalian taxa and have received a great deal of attention. Although voles of the genus Microtus are staples in the diet of many mammalian predators, including domestic cats (Felis catus), there are no previous studies on vole space utilization and activity levels in response to odor cues from domestic cats. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate responses of adult prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) living in semi-natural habitats to odor cues from domestic cat excreta. Contrary to expectations, neither adult males or females showed significant changes in space use or willingness to enter traps in response to cat odors. One hypothesis to explain our results are that prairie voles have not co-evolved with domestic cats long enough to respond to their odors. Other possible explanations include whether levels of odors in the environment were sufficient to trigger a response or that the perceived risk of predation from odor cues alone did not outweigh relative costs of changing space use and activity levels. Future studies should consider multiple factors when determining what cues are sufficient to elicit antipredatory behavior.


1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Niewiarowski ◽  
J. D. Congdon ◽  
A. E. Dunham ◽  
L. J. Vitt ◽  
D. W. Tinkle

Potential costs and benefits of tail autotomy in lizards have been inferred almost exclusively from experimental study in semi-natural enclosures and from indirect comparative evidence from natural populations. We present complementary evidence of the costs of tail autotomy to the lizard Uta stansburiana from detailed demographic study of a natural population. On initial capture, we broke the tails of a large sample of free-ranging hatchlings (560) and left the tails of another large sample (455) intact, and then followed subsequent hatchling growth and survival over a 3-year period. Surprisingly, in 1 out of the 3 years of study, survival of female hatchlings with broken tails exceeded that of female hatchlings with intact tails. Furthermore, no effects of tail loss on survivorship were detected for male hatchlings. However, in 2 years when recaptures were very frequent (1961, 1962), growth rates of hatchlings with broken tails were significantly slower than those of their counterparts with intact tails. We discuss our results in the broader context of estimating the relative costs and benefits of tail autotomy in natural populations, and suggest that long-term demographic studies will provide the best opportunity to assess realized fitness costs and benefits with minimum bias. We also describe how experimentally induced tail autotomy can be used as a technique to complement experimental manipulation of reproductive investment in the study of life-history trade-offs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Moffatt ◽  
Jonathan M. Gerber ◽  
Joan M.C. Blom ◽  
Lance J. Kriegsfeld ◽  
Randy J. Nelson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document