Segregation by humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) cows with a calf in coastal habitat near the island of Hawaii

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mari A. Smultea

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) were tracked from shore to determine habitat-use patterns in an area relatively undisturbed by human activity near the "Big Island" of Hawaii during the winter 1988 and 1989 calving seasons. The temporal and spatial distributions of whales differed with group size and composition. During afternoon hours, groups containing a calf occurred in water significantly shallower and nearer to shore than did groups without a calf. Late in the breeding season, the same segregation pattern occurred throughout the day. Between-groups distances were significantly greater for groups with a calf than distances between all other groups. The number of whales observed per hour peaked during mid-February, although the relative sighting rates for various group sizes and compositions varied across the breeding season. Adults without a calf may use deep water to facilitate breeding behavior, while maternal females may use shallower water to avoid harassment and injury to calves from sexually active males, turbulent offshore or deep sea conditions, or predators. The predominance of cows with a calf in coastal habitat increases their exposure to expanding human-related development and aquatic activities that could injure, disturb, or displace them.

Author(s):  
Marcos R. Rossi-Santos ◽  
Elitieri Santos-Neto ◽  
Clarêncio G. Baracho

The large majority of cetacean interspecific studies report only on dolphin interactions, while studies on interactions between odontocete and mysticete are less common. The present work aims to report on sightings of cetacean interactions, during the breeding season of humpback whales(Megaptera novaeangliae), along 370 km of the Bahia State, north-eastern Brazil, addressing aspects of cetacean distribution and behaviour. During 7 seasons (2000–2006), a total of 230 research cruises were performed, in which 38 events of interactions among humpback whales and other cetaceans(Tursiops truncatus, Steno bredanensis, Peponocephala electraandBalaenoptera acutorostrata)were observed, plus another 5 encounters without the whale's presence, includingT. truncatus, S. bredanensis, P. electra, Stenella clymeneandStenella attenuata. Our results confirm the occurrence of multiple cetacean species in the Bahia State, being the first study in the world to report on a large range of interactions involving another 4 cetacean species, grouped with up to 3 mixed species per sighting, with humpback whales in their annual breeding ground.


1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Chu ◽  
Sharon Nieukirk

We compared the number of linear marks and the shapes of dorsal fins of different classes of humpback whales during the breeding season. Male humpbacks tend to have more marks than females. Such marks are probably scars resulting from physical contact during intrasexual competition for mates. Not all males have marks; therefore, an unmarked adult humpback could be a male or a female. An adult with many marks is likely a male, however. Differences in the dorsal fins of principal and secondary escorts in large groups of competing males suggest that not all escorts have the same chance of attaining principal escort status. Therefore, male – male competitions in large groups should not necessarily be viewed as contests between equals. Principal escorts showed significantly more of some types of marks than did lone escorts of cows with calves, suggesting that not all lone escorts may retain their position if challenged.


Author(s):  
Hugo Bornatowski ◽  
Leonardo L. Wedekin ◽  
Michael R. Heithaus ◽  
Milton César C. Marcondes ◽  
Marcos R. Rossi-Santos

Although it is largely assumed that shark predation and predation risk are unimportant to large cetaceans, whales can make up large portions of the diets of some shark species. We investigated interactions between sharks and cetaceans in the Abrolhos Bank (16°40′ to 19°40′S), off the eastern coast of Brazil, including scavenging and predation attempts on living humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). In order to determine the frequency of shark bites on cetaceans, both living and postmortem, we used carcasses discovered along the coast of Abrolhos Bank between 2001 and 2010 and photographs of living cetaceans during systematic and opportunistic visual surveys from 2004 to 2009. We analysed a total of 221 cetacean carcasses, of which 150 (67.8%) were humpback whales. Large sharks had fed on 22.3% (35 of 150) of humpback whales carcasses, and 20.8% (10 of 48) of carcasses of other species. Only three living humpback whales (<1%) had bite scars from large sharks, suggesting that they at least occasionally target living humpbacks. Cookiecutter shark bite marks also were observed on both dead and living cetaceans, with numerous living humpbacks showing multiple bites. The abundance of humpback whale carcasses available over the Abrolhos Bank, mainly during the humpback breeding season, may be an important component of shark diets seasonally. Further work is needed to better understand the frequency of shark attacks on mysticetes, potential costs of sublethal injuries, and importance of whales to shark diets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 313 ◽  
pp. 113888
Author(s):  
Greta Dalle Luche ◽  
Ashley S.P. Boggs ◽  
John R. Kucklick ◽  
Darryl W. Hawker ◽  
Jillian H. Wisse ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Burns ◽  
Lyndon Brooks ◽  
Phil Clapham ◽  
Peter Harrison

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana G. Lunardi ◽  
Márcia H. Engel ◽  
Regina H. F. Macedo

Behavior of humpback whales was observed during the reproductive period off the northern coast of the state of Bahia (NB, n = 378 groups) and at the Abrolhos Bank (AB, n = 919) to compare patterns and group composition between the two locations. Alone individuals and dyads were most often encountered in both areas, although mother-calf pairs were more common in AB. While these two regions comprise distinct concentrations of humpback whales, with intrinsic environmental differences, behavior patterns were quite similar. The only behavioral differences found where for "tail up" and "resting". The patterns found here may reflect differences in the protection status of the areas or intrinsic environmental differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document