Control of the respiratory mode in air-breathing fishes

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal J. Smatresk
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Information ◽  
Great Variability ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Sensory Receptors ◽  
Air Breathing ◽  
Aerial Respiration ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Oxygen Sensitive ◽  
Respiratory Reflex ◽  
Stimulation Of

The transition from water breathing to air breathing for most bimodally breathing fishes appears to be critically dependent on sensory information from three major sets of peripheral receptors. Dominant control over the respiratory mode arises from stimulation of oxygen-sensitive chemoreceptors. Stimulation of internally oriented chemoreceptors generally increases both aquatic and aerial respiration, while stimulation of external chemoreceptors may shift the ventilatory emphasis from water to air breathing. Air-breathing organ mechanoreceptors may help to reflexively stimulate or inhibit air breathing upon deflation or inflation of the air-breathing organ, and probably play a major role in matching ventilation to perfusion in the air-breathing organ. Waterborne irritants or emersion stimulate defense receptors that may override control priorities set by other receptors, and inhibit branchial ventilation in favor of air breathing. While there is still little detailed information about the distribution and characteristics of these sensory receptors, it seems likely that similar sets of receptors control the respiratory mode in most air-breathing fishes, and that differences in the central integration of this sensory information may best account for the great variability of respiratory reflex responses in this diverse group of animals.

Hindleg targeting during scratching in the locust

1997 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Matheson
Keyword(s):  
Tactile Stimulation ◽  
Schistocerca Gregaria ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Sensory Receptors ◽  
Mechanical Constraints ◽  
Metathoracic Ganglion ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Stimulus Site ◽  
Site Of Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Intact locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) respond to tactile stimulation of their folded wings with rhythmic scratching movements of the ipsilateral hindleg that are directed towards the site of stimulation. For example, sites near the base of a wing elicit anteriorly directed scratches, whereas sites near the distal end of a wing elicit posteriorly directed scratches. Locusts also scratch in response to tactile stimulation of a wing that is held outstretched in a posture similar to that normally adopted during flight, but they fail to alter their leg targeting to compensate for this changed position of the stimulus site. Instead, they scratch at an empty point in space near the abdomen, where the stimulus site would have been if the wing was folded in the resting posture. This inappropriate scratching does not result from mechanical constraints on the hindleg's movement, from stimulation of abdominal sensory receptors, or from an absence of sensory information from the outstretched wing. It also persists when the metathoracic ganglion that controls movements of the hindlegs is isolated from the remainder of the central nervous system (CNS). Targeted scratching of sites on the wings of locusts therefore appears to be fixed relative to body coordinates and does not take into account alterations of the target wing's position.

Respiratory reflex responses to stimulation of tracheal mucosa in enflurane-anesthetized humans

1988 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 1069-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nishino ◽  
K. Hiraga ◽  
T. Mizuguchi ◽  
Y. Honda
Keyword(s):  
Minimum Alveolar Concentration ◽  
Depth Of Anesthesia ◽  
Tracheal Mucosa ◽  
Cough Reflex ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Enflurane Anesthesia ◽  
Shallow Breathing ◽  
Different Depths ◽  
Respiratory Reflex ◽  
Stimulation Of

We investigated respiratory reflex responses to tracheal mucosa stimulation induced by injection of distilled water in 13 female patients under three different depths of enflurane anesthesia (0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 minimum alveolar concentration). Detailed analysis of the types of reflex responses revealed that there are at least six different responses: 1) the apneic reflex, 2) the expiration reflex, 3) spasmodic, panting breathing, 4) the cough reflex, 5) slowing of breathing, and 6) rapid, shallow breathing. Among these reflex responses, the cough reflex was the most sensitive and the apneic reflex followed by slowing of breathing was the most resistant to deepening anesthesia, whereas the sensitivity of other types of reflex responses was in between. Our results indicate that the types of respiratory reflex responses to tracheal mucosa stimulation are associated with depths of anesthesia and that the differences in sensitivity to anesthesia may be a valuable sign in clinical assessment of depth of anesthesia.

Reflex responses evoked from cats' coccygeal ventral roots by electrical stimulation of the tail nerves

1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Martinez-Gomez ◽  
Pablo Pacheco ◽  
Bernardo Dubrovsky
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Ventral Roots ◽  
Stimulation Of

Synaptic Responses of Neurons Controlling the Parotid and von Ebner Salivary Glands in Rats to Stimulation of the Solitary Nucleus and Tract

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 1267-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Suwabe ◽  
Hideyuki Fukami ◽  
Robert M. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Salivary Secretion ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Membrane Hyperpolarization ◽  
Neuron Response ◽  
Glutamate Receptor Antagonists ◽  
Autonomic Neurons ◽  
Reflex Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Salivary secretion results from reflex stimulation of autonomic neurons via afferent sensory information relayed to neurons in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST), which synapse with autonomic neurons of the salivatory nuclei. We investigated the synaptic properties of the afferent sensory connection to neurons in the inferior salivatory nucleus (ISN) controlling the parotid and von Ebner salivary glands. Mean synaptic latency recorded from parotid gland neurons was significantly shorter than von Ebner gland neurons. Superfusion of GABA and glycine resulted in a concentration-dependent membrane hyperpolarization. Use of glutamate receptor antagonists indicated that both AMPA and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are involved in the evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). Inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) amplitude increased with higher intensity ST stimulation. Addition of the glycine antagonist strychnine did not affect the amplitude of the IPSPs significantly. The GABAA receptor antagonist, bicuculline (BMI) or mixture of strychnine and BMI abolished the IPSPs in all neurons. IPSP latency was longer than EPSP latency, suggesting that more than one synapse is involved in the inhibitory pathway. Results show that ISN neurons receive both excitatory and inhibitory afferent input mediated by glutamate and GABA respectively. The ISN neuron response to glycine probably derives from descending connections. Difference in the synaptic characteristics of ISN neurons controlling the parotid and von Ebner glands may relate to the different function of these two glands.

Jaw Reflexes Evoked by Mechanical Stimulation of Teeth in Humans

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 2156-2163 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yang ◽  
K. S. Türker
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stimulation ◽  
Masseter Muscle ◽  
Response Pattern ◽  
Bite Force ◽  
Reflex Response ◽  
Incisor Tooth ◽  
Jaw Muscles ◽  
Reflex Responses ◽  
Closing Force ◽  
Stimulation Of

Jaw reflexes evoked by mechanical stimulation of teeth in humans. The reflex response of jaw muscles to mechanical stimulation of an upper incisor tooth was investigated using the surface electromyogram (SEMG) of the masseter muscle and the bite force. With a slowly rising stimulus, the reflex response obtained on the masseter SEMG showed three different patterns of reflex responses; sole excitation, sole inhibition, and inhibition followed by excitation. Simultaneously recorded bite force, however, exhibited mainly one reflex response pattern, a decrease followed by an increase in the net closing force. A rapidly rising stimulus also induced several different patterns of reflex responses in the masseter SEMG. When the simultaneously recorded bite force was analyzed, however, there was only one reflex response pattern, a decrease in the net closing force. Therefore, the reflex change in the masseter muscle is not a good representative of the net reflex response of all jaw muscles to mechanical tooth stimulation. The net response is best expressed by the averaged bite force. The averaged bite force records showed that when the stimulus force was developing rapidly, the periodontal reflex could reduce the bite force and hence protect the teeth and supporting tissues from damaging forces. It also can increase the bite force; this might help keep food between the teeth if the change in force rate is slow, especially when the initial bite force is low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document