Comment: The blunting of Occam's Razor, or to hell with parsimony

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent E. Holsinger

The principle of parsimony is a useful methodological tool in the choice between competing hypotheses if the hypotheses are of equal explanatory power. Its use is defended by the discussion of several examples, and a recent objection to its use is shown to be the result of a misinterpretation of the principle.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dresp-Langley ◽  
Ekseth ◽  
Fesl ◽  
Gohshi ◽  
Kurz ◽  
...  

Detecting quality in large unstructured datasets requires capacities far beyond the limits of human perception and communicability and, as a result, there is an emerging trend towards increasingly complex analytic solutions in data science to cope with this problem. This new trend towards analytic complexity represents a severe challenge for the principle of parsimony (Occam’s razor) in science. This review article combines insight from various domains such as physics, computational science, data engineering, and cognitive science to review the specific properties of big data. Problems for detecting data quality without losing the principle of parsimony are then highlighted on the basis of specific examples. Computational building block approaches for data clustering can help to deal with large unstructured datasets in minimized computation time, and meaning can be extracted rapidly from large sets of unstructured image or video data parsimoniously through relatively simple unsupervised machine learning algorithms. Why we still massively lack in expertise for exploiting big data wisely to extract relevant information for specific tasks, recognize patterns and generate new information, or simply store and further process large amounts of sensor data is then reviewed, and examples illustrating why we need subjective views and pragmatic methods to analyze big data contents are brought forward. The review concludes on how cultural differences between East and West are likely to affect the course of big data analytics, and the development of increasingly autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) aimed at coping with the big data deluge in the near future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo A. Van Den Berg

The principle of parsimony, also known as ‘Occam's razor’, is a heuristic dictum that is thoroughly familiar to virtually all practitioners of science: Aristotle, Newton, and many others have enunciated it in some form or other. Even though the principle is not difficult to comprehend as a general heuristic guideline, it has proved surprisingly resistant to being put on a rigorous footing – a difficulty that has become more pressing and topical with the ‘big data’ explosion. We review the significance of Occam's razor in the philosophical and theological writings of William of Ockham, and survey modern developments of parsimony in data science.


Brittonia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Caputo ◽  
Dennis Wm. Stevenson ◽  
Aldo Moretti

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1038-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID PEACOCK ◽  
GREG MUTZE ◽  
RON SINCLAIR ◽  
JOHN KOVALISKI ◽  
BRIAN COOKE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bonawitz ◽  
Tania Lombrozo

A growing literature suggests that generating and evaluating explanations is a key mechanism for learning and inference, but little is known about how children generate and select competing explanations. This study investigates whether young children prefer explanations that are simple, where simplicity is quantified as the number of causes invoked in an explanation, and how this preference is reconciled with probability information. Both preschool-aged children and adults were asked to explain an event that could be generated by one or two causes, where the probabilities of the causes varied across conditions. In two experiments we found that children preferred explanations involving one cause over two, but were also sensitive to the probability of competing explanations. Adults, in contrast, responded on the basis of probability alone. These data suggest that children employ a principle of parsimony like Occam’s razor as an inductive constraint, and that this constraint may be employed when more reliable bases for inference are unavailable.


1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 841-842
Author(s):  
RONALD W. MARX

Author(s):  
Ashish Sharma ◽  
Nilesh Kumar ◽  
Nikulaa Parachuri ◽  
Sonali Singh ◽  
Francesco Bandello ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document