Use of artificial subice air pockets by wild ringed seals (Phoca hispida)

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1092-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen R. Milne

Ringed seals were observed to inhale exhaust air expelled by SCUBA divers who were diving under 1.9-m thick, 1-year-old fast ice in Lancaster Sound during mid-April, 1973, The underside of the sea ice was imperfectly flat so that some of the bubbles of exhaust air coalesced into large lenticular bubbles 1 to 3 cm in depth, and these, on occasions, were partially inhaled by seals. Between dives, separated in time by as little as 3 h, all the under-ice air bubbles, large and small, vanished. It is assumed that the buoyant air migrated upward into the sea ice by the progressive displacement of brine in drainage channels. Although the exhaust air was readily used by ringed seals, it is unlikely that naturally occurring air pockets can persist beneath 1 -year-old sea ice to enable seals to extend their under-ice travels.

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 858-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Furgal ◽  
K. M. Kovacs ◽  
S. Innes

Characteristics of ringed seal (Phoca hispida) subnivean structures and breeding habitat were quantified and their potential influence on predation success by polar bears (Ursus maritimus), arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus), and humans on ringed seals was investigated in Admiralty Inlet and Strathcona Sound, Northwest Territories. A total of 237 ringed seal structures were located between April and June 1991–1993 using trained dogs. Ringed seal lairs and breathing holes were concentrated in areas of deep snow, and were associated with large, thick ice ridges. Only a small percentage of the available fast-ice habitat had sufficient snow depth for lair construction each year. A discriminant function analysis used to classify structures located in 1992, using a combination of structural and habitat measurements, correctly classified 70% of structures located in 1991 and 1993 into functional groups. The length, width, internal height, and level of "tiggak," the odour of rutting male ringed seals, associated with structures were the most important descriptors separating structure types. Seventy-three percent of structures located in the study were undisturbed by predators. The mean length and width of structures entered by predators were significantly greater than those of undisturbed structures. Polar bear success decreased as snow depth and the thickness of the roof covering the structures increased. The conditions necessary for successful arctic fox predation are unclear. Inuit hunters attacked structures close to ice ridges, and ridge height and snow depth influenced their success. All predators attacked lairs having the odour of rutting male ringed seals less often than structures with no male odour.


1998 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav E Belikov ◽  
Andrei N Boltunov

This paper presents a review of available published and unpublished material on the ringed seal (Phoca hispida) in the western part of the Russian Arctic, including the White, Barents and Kara seas. The purpose of the review is to discuss the status of ringed seal stocks in relation to their primary habitat, the history of sealing, and a recent harvest of the species in the region. The known primary breeding habitats for this species are in the White Sea, the south-western part of the Barents Sea, and in the coastal waters of the Kara Sea, which are seasonally covered by shore-fast ice. The main sealing sites are situated in the same areas. Female ringed seals become mature by the age of 6, and males by the age of 7. In March-April a female gives birth to one pup in a breeding lair constructed in the shore-fast ice. The most important prey species for ringed seals in the western sector of the Russian Arctic are pelagic fish and crustaceans. The maximum annual sealing level for the region was registered in the first 70 years of the 20th century: the White Sea maximum (8,912 animals) was registered in 1912; the Barents Sea maximum (13,517 animals) was registered in 1962; the Kara Sea maximum (13,200 animals) was registered in 1933. Since the 1970s, the number of seals harvested has decreased considerably. There are no data available for the number of seals harvested annually by local residents for their subsistence.


1998 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
E W Born ◽  
J Teilmann ◽  
F Riget

With the purpose of determining the distribution and abundance of ringed seals (Phoca hispida) hauling out on the ice, systematic strip census aerial surveys were flown in the Kong Oscars Fjord, Scoresby Sund and adjacent areas (between approximately 70°N and 72°30'N in eastern Greenland) from 7 to 13 June 1984. The study area comprised approximately 18,500 km2 mainly covered with smooth one-year-old shore-fast ice. The survey effort was concentrated in the afternoon during the presumed peak haul-out period. Main emphasis was given to surveying the Kong Oscars Fjord/Davy Sund and the Scoresby Sund/Hurry Fjord areas which were surveyed twice. Average densities in various sub-areas varied between 0.3 and 2.9 seals/km2 and were similar tothose reported from other Arctic areas. No significant differences in densities were found between sets of surveys of the same sub-areas. The mean density (2.00 seals/km2, SD=0.22) in the Scoresby Sund area was significantly higher than that found in Kong Oscars Fjord (1.04 seals/km\ SD=0.15) probably reflecting a higher overall marine productivity in Scoresby Sund. The sum of the point estimates of the visible part of the population in the different sub-areas was 28,882 seals.


1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2503-2512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Kelly ◽  
Lori T. Quakenbush

Thirteen ringed seals monitored by radiotelemetry in the shore-fast ice of the Beaufort and Chukchi seas were faithful to subnivean haulout sites from March to June. Each seal frequented as many as four lairs; the distances between lairs used by individual seals were as great as 3438 m. Mean distances between lairs used by individual males and females were 1997 and 634 m, respectively. Seals were not commonly seen resting on the ice outside of lairs until late May or June, but two radio-tagged male seals began basking on 15 April and 7 May, respectively. The proportion of time spent out of the water was 12.1% in March, 18.6% in April, 21.9% in May, and 42.9% in early June. From late March to June, males were out of the water during 13.1% of the monitored periods, and females were out of the water during 24.0% of those periods. Mean hours of haulout bouts were between 18:00 and 02:30 in early spring (except for a lactating female who hauled out most frequently at 11:00) and between 10:00 and 16:30 in late spring.


1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1857-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. S. Kingsley ◽  
I. Stirling

The ringed seal, Phoca hispida, hauls out at the edge of self-maintained breathing holes or narrow cracks, either in fast ice or in the centre of large floes in pack ice, apparently because this reduces its vulnerability to capture by polar bears, Ursus maritimus. Antipredator behaviour of ringed seals at haul-out sites also includes lying facing both their breathing hole and downwind, and vigilance. The much larger bearded seal, Erignathus barbatus, hauls out on the edges of wide leads or large holes in the ice, or on the points of small ice floes, and also faces both the water and downwind. Ice-associated seals which are not threatened by surface predators do not show these behaviour patterns.


ARCTIC ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-220
Author(s):  
Lois A. Harwood ◽  
Thomas G. Smith ◽  
John Alikamik ◽  
Emma Alikamik ◽  
Ellen V. Lea ◽  
...  

The circumpolar Arctic ringed seal (Pusa hispida) occupies its fast-ice breeding habitat for four to five months during winter and the pack ice or open water of adjacent areas for the rest of the year. From 1971 – 78 and 1992 – 2019, we sampled approximately 100 ringed seals annually from western Prince Albert Sound (WPAS), the prime ringed seal fast-ice breeding habitat in Canada’s Western Arctic, adjacent to primary overwinter foraging habitat in eastern Amundsen Gulf (EAG). As our metric of body condition, we measured ventral blubber depth corrected for body size. As our metrics of reproduction, we measured the annual ovulation rate of multiparous females and percent pups in the open-water harvest. We examined these biological parameters in relation to the winter Arctic Oscillation Index (winAOI) and the timing of sea ice clearance in EAG in spring. There were no significant effects of age or sample month (June or July) on adult blubber depth, but significant sex and year effects and, in females, ovulation status effects. Across the series, as we have observed previously through 2011, there was a sustained temporal declining trend in blubber depth in adults of both sexes. There was no temporal trend in residual blubber depth, no correlation between blubber depth and sea ice clearance date in EAG, and a quasi-cyclic pattern in blubber depth that tracked some of the phases of the winAOI. Annual ovulation rates were mainly in the 80% – 100% range and correlated with percent pups in the open harvest in the same year. Three (1974, 2005, 2012) of the 36 y experienced reproductive failures, when over 50% of the multiparous females failed to ovulate. In each case, ovulation rates returned to normal within 1 – 3 y. Low annual ovulation rates were correlated with late sea ice clearance in EAG in spring, with two widespread ovulation failure events taking place in years when spring sea ice clearance was delayed by five to six weeks. The most recent ovulation failure (2012) differed in that it came in an average ice year but at the end of a six-year sequence of negative residual mean blubber depths. Earlier spring sea ice clearance in WPAS, based on the observed rate of 3.8 d per decade, would on average not result in the physical loss of sea ice for pupping in this core habitat before 2140. The mechanisms involved in the sustained declining temporal trend in body condition, linkage with some phases of the winAOI, and the temporary but episodic failures of ovulation are complex and not fully explained by either the timing of sea ice clearance or the winAOI. Until the complex mix of factors, pressures and responses are understood, our ability to predict the impacts of a changing climate on ringed seals will remain limited.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1985-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerwin J. Finley

Numbers of ringed seals hauled out on the ice began to increase in early June. Numbers on the ice were highest from 0900 to 1500 hours Central Standard Time and lowest (average 40–50% of peak) in early morning. Seals commonly remained on the ice for several hours, and occasionally (during calm weather) for > 48 h. Numbers on the ice were reduced on windy days and possibly also on unusually warm, bright and calm days. Seals tended to face away from the wind (particularly with high wind speed) and oriented broadside to the sun. Seals usually occurred singly (60–70% of all groups) at their holes.Numbers of seals hauled out at Freemans Cove remained relatively constant during June (maximum density 4.86/km2), whereas at Aston Bay numbers increased dramatically to a maximum density of 10.44/km2 in late June. The increase was thought to be due to an influx of seals abandoning unstable ice. The density of seal holes at Freemans Cove (5.92/km2) was much higher than at Aston Bay (2.73/km2). The ratio of holes to the maximum numbers of seals (1.12:1) at Freemans Cove represents a first estimate of this relationship in an apparently stable population.


1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
N J Lunn ◽  
I Stirling ◽  
S N Nowicki

We flew a medium-altitude, systematic, strip-transect survey for ringed (Phoca hispida) and bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) over western Hudson Bay in early June 1994 and 1995. The mean density (per square kilometre) of ringed seals hauled out on the ice was four times higher in 1995 (1.690) than in 1994 (0.380). The 1994 survey appeared to underestimate seal abundance because it was flown too late. Ringed seals preferred high ice cover habitat (6 + /8 ice) and, within this habitat, favoured cracking ice and large floes. We found no consistent effect of either wind or cloud cover on habitat preference. We estimated a total of 1980 bearded seals and 140<|>880 ringed seals hauled out on the sea ice in June 1995. A recent review of the relationship between ringed seal and polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations suggests that a visible population of this size should support a population of up to 1300 polar bears, which is in general agreement with the current estimate of 1250-1300 bears in western Hudson Bay.


1992 ◽  
Vol 226 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ryg ◽  
Y. Solberg ◽  
C. Lydersen ◽  
T. G. Smith
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document