Effects of pinealectomy and bilateral enucleation on the phototactic response and on the conditioned response to light of the goldfish Carassius auratus L.

1970 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Fenwick

Intact goldfish in a light gradient were unevenly distributed and spent most of their time in the darker half of the gradient. Pinealectomized, bilaterally enucleated, or pinealectomized plus bilaterally enucleated goldfish were distributed uniformly throughout the light gradient. It was concluded that the phototactic response of goldfish depends upon the presence of the pineal organ as well as the eyes.In a conditioning situation, pinealectomized animals with intact vision showed significantly more responses to the conditioned stimulus than did the control animals with intact vision when the conditioned stimulus was light, but not when the conditioned stimulus was sound. Blind goldfish, with or without an intact pineal, could not be effectively conditioned to light although they did become conditioned to sound. Pinealectomy did not affect the conditioning of either the blind or the eyed goldfish to sound.Among goldfish with intact vision, pinealectomy increased the spontaneous swimming activity. Blinding enhanced the level of spontaneous swimming activity more than did pinealectomy. But blind plus pinealectomized goldfish displayed a level of spontaneous swimming activity which was intermediate between the level shown by pinealectomized eyed animals and blind animals with an intact pineal.The significance of these findings has been discussed in terms of the photosensory role of the goldfish pineal organ.

2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojuan Xu ◽  
Jordan Bentley ◽  
Todd Miller ◽  
Katherine Zmolek ◽  
Travis Kovaleinen ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen H. Wolach ◽  
Stephen E. Breuning ◽  
Peter Roccaforte ◽  
Nariman Solhkhan

1967 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Johansen

The heat resistance of normal, hypophysectomized and pituitary-autotransplanted goldfish acclimated to 20 °C under 16-h photoperiod and 8-h photoperiod conditions was determined. It was found that hypophysectomized goldfish were less heat resistant than normal fish and that those with an autotransplanted pituitary were as heat resistant as normal fish.The photoperiod results, though inconclusive, suggest that normal 16-h photoperiod fish are more heat resistant than normal 8-h photoperiod fish and that only the fish with a normal pituitary can respond to photoperiod changes. The fish without a pituitary are slightly less heat resistant than normal 8-h-photoperiod fish, while those possessing an autotransplanted pituitary are as resistant to a high temperature as normal 16-h-photo period fish.Treatment of hypophysectomized goldfish with luteinizing, thyrotropic, adrenocorticotropic, and lactotropic (prolactin) hormones and crude salmon pituitary extract appeared not to affect resistance to a high temperature.In the experiments involving pituitary autotransplantation, a study was made of various organs influenced by pituitary secretions to determine the pattern of hormone output by the pituitary. By contrasting this information with that of the heat resistance tests, various hormones have been suggested as not playing an essential role in high temperature resistance. The hypothesis is put forward that a prolactin-like hormone plays the essential role in resisting a high-temperature stress.


1980 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan E. Breuning ◽  
Donald G. Ferguson ◽  
Maureen A. McHale ◽  
Allen H. Wolach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document