Nutrient management in a Pinusradiata plantation after thinning: the effect of nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrogen fluxes and tree growth

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1673-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Carlyle
Keyword(s):  
N Uptake ◽  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
N Fluxes ◽  
Highly Correlated ◽  
The Relationship

The influence of N fertilizer on soil mineral N fluxes, canopy development, and tree growth was studied in a thinned 11-year-old Pinusradiata D. Don plantation. Ammonium sulphate and single superphosphate were applied in an incomplete factorial design, but only the main effects of N application at 0 (control) or 200 kg N•ha−1 are considered here. Spring application of fertilizer increased the quantity of mineral N in the forest floor plus surface soil (0–0.30 m) from 1.2 to 194 kg•ha−1. Within 51 weeks this had fallen to 8.3 kg•ha−1, and after 89 weeks had returned to prefertilizer levels. In the unfertilized soil, rates of net mineralization were low with little seasonal variation. Nitrogen fertilizer increased N mineralization; over the 2 years of measurement fertilized and unfertilized soils mineralized 155 and 77 kg N•ha−1, respectively. There was no net immobilization of fertilizer N. There was no leaching of mineral N from the unfertilized soil whereas 149 kg N•ha−1 was leached below 0.30 m during the 2 years after fertilizer application. Nitrogen uptake increased from 71 kg•ha−1 in the control to 203 kg•ha−1 in the fertilized treatment. Fifty-one percent (103 kg•ha−1) of N uptake by trees in the fertilized treatment occurred within 20 weeks of fertilizer application. Fertilized trees took up 58% of the available N (N added as fertilizer plus N mineralized), while 42% was leached. Ammonium dominated the soil mineral N pool and mineral N fluxes, with nitrate generally accounting for less than 10% of mineral N in both fertilized and unfertilized soils. Leaching of mineral N from the fertilized soil (Nleach, kg•ha−1•week−1) was highly correlated (r2 = 0.92) with soil mineral N content (Nstart, kg•ha−1) and effective rainfall (rainfall minus evaporation, Reff, mm•week−1) according to the relationship Nleach = aNstart + bReff, while N uptake (kg•ha−1•week−1) was highly correlated (r2 = 0.91) with soil mineral N content and N mineralization (Nmin, kg•ha−1•week−1) according to the relationship Nuptake = aNstart + bNmin. Fertilizer increased needle N concentrations and content by 52 and 87%, respectively, after 58 weeks, and resulted in a 17% increase in leaf area index after 71 weeks. These differences were reflected by an increase in basal area increment of 23% during the 2 years since fertilizer application. The rapid uptake of N fertilizer was associated with storage in existing biomass. Uptake of fertilizer N should, therefore, increase with plantation biomass. Consequently, it should be possible to increase the uptake of N fertilizer, and minimize leaching, by applying fertilizer before, rather than after, thinning. Such a strategy may be particularly appropriate for soils that have a low capacity to retain applied N.

Dynamics of nitrogen capture without fertilizer: the baseline for fertilizing winter wheat in the UK

2001 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. SYLVESTER-BRADLEY ◽  
D. T. STOKES ◽  
R. K. SCOTT
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Soil Horizon ◽  
Soil N ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer Use ◽  
The Uk

Experiments at three sites in 1993, six sites in 1994 and eight sites in 1995, mostly after oilseed rape, tested effects of previous fertilizer N (differing by 200 kg/ha for 1993 and 1994 and 300 kg/ha for 1995) and date of sowing (differing by about 2 months) on soil mineral N and N uptake by winter wheat cv. Mercia which received no fertilizer N. Soil mineral N to 90 cm plus crop N (‘soil N supply’; SNS) in February was 103 and 76 kg/ha after large and small amounts of previous fertilizer N respectively but was not affected by date of sowing. Previous fertilizer N seldom affected crop N in spring because sowing was too late for N capture during autumn, but it did affect soil mineral N, particularly in the 60–90 cm soil horizon, presumably due to over-winter leaching. Tillering generally occurred in spring, and was delayed but not diminished by later sowing. Previous fertilizer N increased shoot survival more than it increased shoot production. Final shoot number was affected by previous fertilizer N, but not by date of sowing. Overall, there were 29 surviving tillers/g SNS.N uptakes at fortnightly intervals from spring to harvest at two core sites were described well by linear rates. The difference between sowings in the fitted date with 10 kg/ha crop N was 1 month; these dates were not significantly affected by previous fertilizer. N uptake rates were increased by both previous fertilizer N and late sowing. Rates of N uptake related closely to soil mineral N in February such that ‘equivalent recovery’ was achieved in late May or early June. At one site there was evidence that most of the residue from previous fertilizer N had moved below 90 cm by February, but N uptake was nevertheless increased. Two further ‘satellite’ sites behaved similarly. Thus at 14 out of 17 sites, N uptake until harvest related directly and with approximate parity to soil mineral N in February (R2 = 0·79), a significant intercept being in keeping with an atmospheric contribution of 20–40 kg/ha N at all sites.It is concluded that, on retentive soils in the UK, SNS in early spring was a good indicator of N availability throughout growth of unfertilized wheat, because the N residues arising from previous fertilizer mineralized before analysis, yet remained largely within root range. The steady rates of soil mineral N recovery were taken as being dependent on progressively deeper root development. Thus, even if soil mineral N equated with a crop's N requirement, fresh fertilizer applications might be needed before ‘equivalent recovery’ of soil N, to encourage the earlier processes of tiller production and canopy expansion. The later process of grain filling was sustained by continued N uptake (mean 41 kg/ha) coming apparently from N leached to the subsoil (relating to previous fertilizer use) as well as from sources not related to previous fertilizer use; significant net mineralization was apparent in some subsoils.

Dependence of soil mineral N on N-fertilizer application

1986 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Neeteson ◽  
D. J. Greenwood ◽  
E. J. M. H. Habets
Keyword(s):  
Fertilizer Application ◽  
N Fertilizer ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N

Cycling of fertilizer and cotton crop residue nitrogen

Soil Research ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 597 ◽  
Author(s):  
IJ Rochester ◽  
GA Constable ◽  
DA Macleod
Keyword(s):  
Crop Residue ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Soil N ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
N Content ◽  
Cotton Crop

Mineral N (nitrate and ammonium) contents were monitored in N-fertilized soils supporting cotton crops to provide information on the nitrification, mineralization and immobilization processes operating in the soil. The relative contributions of fertilizer N, previous cotton crop residue N and indigenous soil N to the mineral N pools and to the current crop's N uptake were calculated. After N fertilizer (urea) application, the soil's mineral N content rose rapidly and subsequently declined at a slower rate. The recovery of 15N-labelled urea as mineral N declined exponentially with time. Biological immobilization (and possibly denitrification to some extent) were believed to be the major processes reducing post-application soil mineral N content; the decline could not be accounted for by crop N uptake alone. Progressively less N was mineralized upon incubation of soil sampled through the growing season. Little soil N (either from urea or crop residue) was mineralized at crop maturity. Cycling of N was evident between the soil mineral and organic N pools throughout the cotton growing season. Considerable quantities of fertilizer N were immobilized by the soil microbiomass; immobilized N was remineralized and subsequently taken up by the cotton crop. A large proportion of the crop N was taken up in the latter part of the season when the soil mineral N content was low. We suggest that much of the N taken up by cotton was derived from microbial sources, rather than crop residues. The application of cotton crop residue (stubble) slightly reduced the mineral N content in the soil by encouraging biological immobilization. 15N was mineralized very slowly from the labelled crop residue and did not contribute significantly to the supply of N to the current crop. Recovery of labelled fertilizer N and labelled crop residue N by the cotton crop was 28 and 1%, respectively. In comparison, the apparent recovery of fertilizer N was 48%. Indigenous soil N contributed 68% of the N taken up by the cotton crop.

Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring

1987 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Addiscott ◽  
A. P. Whitmore
Keyword(s):  
Soil Temperature ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Sowing Date ◽  
Mineralization Rate ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Soil Mineral Nitrogen ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Crop N Uptake

summaryThe computer model described simulates changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop uptake of nitrogen by computing on a daily basis the amounts of N leached, mineralized, nitrified and taken up by the crop. Denitrification is not included at present. The leaching submodel divides the soil into layers, each of which contains mobile and immobile water. It needs points from the soil moisture characteristic, measured directly or derived from soil survey data; it also needs daily rainfall and evaporation. The mineralization and nitrification submodel assumes pseudo-zero order kinetics and depends on the net mineralization rate in the topsoil and the daily soil temperature and moisture content, the latter being computed in the leaching submodel. The crop N uptake and dry-matter production submodel is a simple function driven by degree days of soil temperature and needs in addition only the sowing date and the date the soil returns to field capacity, the latter again being computed in the leaching submodel. A sensitivity analysis was made, showing the effects of 30% changes in the input variables on the simulated amounts of soil mineral N and crop N present in spring when decisions on N fertilizer rates have to be made. Soil mineral N was influenced most by changes in rainfall, soil water content, mineralization rate and soil temperature, whilst crop N was affected most by changes in soil temperature, rainfall and sowing date. The model has so far been applied only to winter wheat growing through autumn, winter and spring but it should be adaptable to other crops and to a full season.The model was validated by comparing its simulations with measurements of soil mineral N, dry matter and the amounts of N taken up by winter wheat in experiments made at seven sites during 5 years. The simulations were assessed graphically and with the aid of several statistical summaries of the goodness of fit. The agreement was generally very good; over all years 72% of all simulations of soil mineral N to 90 cm depth were within 20 kg N/ha of the soil measurements; also 78% of the simulations of crop nitrogen uptake were within 15 kg N/ha and 63% of the simulated yields of dry matter were within 25 g/m2 of the amounts measured. All correlation coefficients were large, positive, and highly significant, and on average no statistically significant differences were found between simulation and measurement either for soil mineral N or for crop N uptake.

Five years of straw incorporation and its effect on growth, yield and nitrogen nutrition of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris)

1995 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Allison ◽  
H. M. Hetschkun
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Nitrogen Nutrition ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer Use ◽  
Experimental Station ◽  
Straw Incorporation

SUMMARYIn 1990–92, field experiments were performed at Broom's Barn Experimental Station to study the effect of 5 years' repeated straw incorporation on sugarbeet. Straw incorporation had no effect on plant population density. Processing quality was reduced by incorporated straw but N had a much larger effect. The effect of incorporated straw on the mineral N content of the soils and N uptake by beet was inconsistent, and this may be related to the amount of soil mineral N present when the straw was incorporated. The efficiency of fertilizer use was unaffected by straw incorporation. On Broom's Barn soils when straw was incorporated, the optimal economic N dressing was c. 120 kg N/ha, and in unincorporated plots it was c. 100 kg N/ha. At the optimal economic N rate, incorporated straw increased beet yields.

scholarly journals Greenhouse gas (N2O and CH4) fluxes under nitrogen-fertilised dryland wheat and barley on subtropical Vertosols: risk, rainfall and alternatives

Soil Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme D. Schwenke ◽  
David F. Herridge ◽  
Clemens Scheer ◽  
David W. Rowlings ◽  
Bruce M. Haigh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
N Uptake ◽  
Nitrification Inhibitor ◽  
N2o Emission ◽  
N2o Emissions ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Ch4 Uptake ◽  
Crop N Uptake

The northern Australian grains industry relies on nitrogen (N) fertiliser to optimise yield and protein, but N fertiliser can increase soil fluxes of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). We measured soil N2O and CH4 fluxes associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) using automated (Expts 1, 3) and manual chambers (Expts 2, 4, 5). Experiments were conducted on subtropical Vertosol soils fertilised with N rates of 0–160kgNha–1. In Expt 1 (2010), intense rainfall for a month before and after sowing elevated N2O emissions from N-fertilised (80kgNha–1) wheat, with 417gN2O-Nha–1 emitted compared with 80g N2O-Nha–1 for non-fertilised wheat. Once crop N uptake reduced soil mineral N, there was no further treatment difference in N2O. Expt 2 (2010) showed similar results, however, the reduced sampling frequency using manual chambers gave a lower cumulative N2O. By contrast, very low rainfall before and for several months after sowing Expt 3 (2011) resulted in no difference in N2O emissions between N-fertilised and non-fertilised barley. N2O emission factors were 0.42, 0.20 and –0.02 for Expts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In Expts 4 and 5 (2011), N2O emissions increased with increasing rate of N fertiliser. Emissions were reduced by 45% when the N fertiliser was applied in a 50:50 split between sowing and mid-tillering, or by 70% when urea was applied with the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole-phosphate. Methane fluxes were typically small and mostly negative in all experiments, especially in dry soils. Cumulative CH4 uptake ranged from 242 to 435g CH4-Cha–1year–1, with no effect of N fertiliser treatment. Considered in terms of CO2 equivalents, soil CH4 uptake offset 8–56% of soil N2O emissions, with larger offsets occurring in non-N-fertilised soils. The first few months from N fertiliser application to the period of rapid crop N uptake pose the main risk for N2O losses from rainfed cereal cropping on subtropical Vertosols, but the realisation of this risk is dependent on rainfall. Strategies that reduce the soil mineral N pool during this time can reduce the risk of N2O loss.

scholarly journals An analysis of the response of sugar beet and potatoes to fertilizer nitrogen and soil mineral nitrogen.

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Neeteson ◽  
H.J.C. Zwetsloot
Keyword(s):  
Soil Type ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Fertilizer N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Soil Mineral Nitrogen ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
Organic Manures ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Prior Application

A statistical analysis was performed to investigate if, and to what extent, the response of sugarbeet and potatoes to fertilizer N depended on the amount of mineral N already present in the soil, soil type, and prior application of organic manures. For this purpose the results of 150 field trials with sugarbeet and 98 with potatoes were used. The analysis was focussed on the within-block stratum of variation in yield, where regression models were fitted to describe the response to N. For both sugarbeet and potatoes the best fit was obtained when not only fertilizer N was taken into account, but also soil mineral N, soil type and prior application of organic manures. The response to fertilizer N was weaker as the amount of soil mineral N was larger. The optimum amount of fertilizer N plus soil mineral N required was larger on sandy soils than on loam and clay soils. The difference was about 20 kg N/ha for sugarbeet and 100 kg N/ha for potatoes. When organic manures were applied prior to the application of fertilizer N, the optimum for both sugarbeet and potatoes was 15-50 N/ha lower than without application of organic manures. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission)

scholarly journals Evaluating Cover Crop Mulches for No-till Organic Production of Onions

HortScience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Vollmer ◽  
Nancy Creamer ◽  
Chris Reberg-Horton ◽  
Greg Hoyt
Keyword(s):  
Soybean Meal ◽  
Cover Crops ◽  
Cover Crop ◽  
N Uptake ◽  
Organic Production ◽  
Weed Suppression ◽  
Soil Mineral N ◽  
Soil Mineral ◽  
Mineral N ◽  
No Till

Cover crops of foxtail millet ‘German Strain R’ [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.] and cowpea ‘Iron & Clay’ [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] were grown as monocrops (MIL, COW) and mixtures and compared with a bare ground control (BG) for weed suppression and nitrogen (N) contribution when followed by organically managed no-till bulb onion (Allium cepa L.) production. Experiments in 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 were each conducted on first-year transitional land. Mixtures consisted of cowpea with high, middle, and low seeding rates of millet (MIX-70, MIX-50, MIX-30). During onion production, each cover crop treatment had three N rate subplots (0, 105, and 210 kg N/ha) of surface-applied soybean meal [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Cover crop treatments COW and BG had the greatest total marketable onion yield both years. Where supplemental baled millet was applied in 2006–2007, onion mortality was over 50% in MIL and MIX and was attributed to the thickness of the millet mulch. Nitrogen rates of 105 and 210 kg N/ha increased soil mineral N (NO3– and NH4+) on BG plots 2 weeks after surface application of soybean meal each year, but stopped having an effect on soil mineral N by February or March. Split applications of soybean meal could be an important improvement in N management to better meet increased demand for N uptake during bulb initiation and growth in the spring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document