Competitive interactions between the mountain pine beetle and the pine engraver in lodgepole pine

1991 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1029-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Rankin ◽  
J. H. Borden

The pine engraver (PE), Ipspini (Say), often coexists with the mountain pine beetle (MPB), Dendroctonusponderosae Hopk., in lodgepole pine, Pinuscontorta var. latifolia Engelm. The PE colonizes the upper bole, while the MPB infests the lower bole. We investigated the hypothesis that interspecific interactions between the PE and the MPB within trees can adversely affect MPB progeny production or survival. In lodgepole pine bark attacked by both species, PE and MPB emergence holes had a strong negative interrelationship, suggesting that high numbers of one species resulted in lower numbers of the other. In the laboratory, attacks by PEs on lodgepole pine logs resulted in significantly decreased numbers of MPB progeny, particularly when MPBs and PEs were allowed to attack logs simultaneously. Reductions in MPB progeny were 92.8 and 96.2% when the ratios of attacking beetles were 100 PE: 50 MPB per square metre and 200 PE: 50 MPB per square metre, respectively, compared with that in control logs with 50 MPB per square metre. In an August field experiment, pheromone-induced attack by the PE on trees just attacked by the MPB resulted in a 72.5% reduction in mean MPB progeny production compared with that in MPB-attacked control trees. Possible reasons for the reduced success of MPB when it and the PE coinhabit the same host may be exploitation competition, interference competition, or introduction of fungal competitors deleterious to the MPB. Induced infestation by PEs of MPB-infested trees may have the potential to reduce or control MPB populations.

1994 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese M. Poland ◽  
John H. Borden

AbstractThe pine engraver, Ips pini Say, and Pityogenes knechteli Swaine often co-exist in lodgepole pine, Pinus contoita var. latifolia Engelmann. We tested the hypotheses that P. knechteli produces an attractive pheromone and that the attraction of P. knechteli and I. pint to conspecifics is inhibited by the presence of the other species. Pityogenes knechteli males and females were attracted to bolts infested with conspecific males and to bolts infested with I. pini males; however, there was no significant cross-attraction of I. pini males or females to bolts infested with P. knechteli males. Attraction of P. knechteli and I. pint males and females to bolts infested with conspecific males was not inhibited in the presence of bolts infested with males of the other bark beetle species. Pityogenes knechteli has no potential for competitive displacement of I. pini but may enhance the adverse effect of I. pini on the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins.


2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 2403-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Kashian ◽  
Rebecca M. Jackson ◽  
Heather D. Lyons

Extensive outbreaks of the mountain pine beetle ( Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) will alter the structure of many stands that will likely be attacked again before experiencing a stand-replacing fire. We examined a stand of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm. ex S. Watson) in Grand Teton National Park currently experiencing a moderate-level outbreak and previously attacked by mountain pine beetle in the 1960s. Consistent with published studies, tree diameter was the main predictor of beetle attack on a given tree, large trees were preferentially attacked, and tree vigor, age, and cone production were unimportant variables for beetle attack at epidemic levels. Small trees killed in the stand were killed based mainly on their proximity to large trees and were likely spatially aggregated with large trees as a result of the previous outbreak. We concluded that the driving factors of beetle attack and their spatial patterns are consistent across outbreak severities but that stand structure altered by the previous outbreak had implications for the current outbreaks in the same location. This study should catalyze additional research that examines how beetle-altered stand structure affects future outbreaks — an important priority for predicting their impacts under climate change scenarios that project increases in outbreak frequency and extent.


2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejun Pan ◽  
Dan Xie ◽  
Richard W. Yu ◽  
Jack N. Saddler

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Briggs ◽  
Todd J. Hawbaker ◽  
Don Vandendriesche

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-134
Author(s):  
Wesley G. Page ◽  
Michael J. Jenkins ◽  
Martin E. Alexander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document