A comparison of competition measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees
Five families of competition indices were evaluated and compared on the basis of simple correlation with loblolly pine individual tree growth and multiple correlation with growth in the presence of other tree and stand attributes. The family of distance-independent indices included various relative size measures in the form of tree size to mean size ratios. Crown ratio was also included as a distance-independent measure. The four families of distance-dependent indices included various influence area overlap indices, distance-weighted size ratio indices, Spurr's point density, and Brown's point density or area potentially available (APA). All indices were significantly correlated with dbh and basal area growth. The relative size ratio indices, crown ratio, Spurr's point density, and several APA variations were judged best in simple correlations after accounting for tree size and stand density. The best distance-dependent indices had little if any advantage, either in simple or multiple correlation, over the best distance-independent indices. However, the point density index of Spurr and especially APA contributed significantly to growth prediction even in the presence of tree size, stand density, and the distance-independent size ratio and crown ratio indices. Further, APA had the highest partial correlation when all variables were included in this multiple correlation. It was concluded the APA would be a good index for growth prediction models when other tree and stand attributes are already known.