The structure and internal rotational barrier of 3-phenyl-1-propyne by molecular orbital calculations and the J method

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1496-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Glenn H. Penner
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Geometry Optimization ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Three Solutions ◽  
Spectral Parameters ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectral parameters are reported for 3-phenyl-1-propyne dissolved in CCl4, C6D6, and in acetone-d6. The long-range spin–spin coupling constants imply very small and perhaps vanishing barriers to internal rotation about the [Formula: see text] bond in all three solutions, in contrast to benzyl cyanide in which there exist significant solvent perturbations of the internal barrier. STO 3G MO computations, utilizing geometry optimization procedures, imply an internal rotational potential of V/kJ mol−1 = −2.8 sin2 ψ − 0.6 sin2 2ψ; the angle ψ is 90° when the C≡C bond lies in a plane perpendicular to the benzene plane. 6-31G MO energies imply V/kJ mol−1 = −0.3 sin2 ψ − 0.4 sin2 2ψ, the fourfold component being larger than the twofold. A flat minimum occurs near ψ = 50°.

An estimate of the spin–spin coupling constant, 1J(1H,13C), in gaseous benzene

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1524-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Guy M. Bernard ◽  
Frank E. Hruska
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Dielectric Constant ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Spin Coupling Constant ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Gaseous Benzene

An excellent linear correlation (r = 0.9999) exists between the spin–spin coupling constants 1J(1H,13C), in benzene dissolved in four solvents (R. Laatikainen et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 11006 (1995)) and Ando's solvation dielectric function, ε/(ε – 1). The solvents are cyclohexane, carbon disulfide, pyridine, and acetone. 1J(1H,13C)for gaseous benzene is predicted to be 156.99(2) Hz at 300 K. Key words: spin–spin coupling constants, 1J(1H,13C) for benzene in the vapor phase; spin–spin coupling constants, solvent dielectric constant dependence of 1J(1H,13C) in benzene; benzene, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in the vapor; nuclear magnetic resonance, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in gaseous benzene.

A proton magnetic resonance determination of the small rotational barriers about the C—Si bond in phenyl derivatives of chloro and methyl silanes

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Ted Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Proton Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of ◽  
Low Energy Conformations

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between protons bonded to silicon and ring protons in C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, C6H5SiH2CH3, C6H5SiHCl2, and C6H5SiH(CH3)2 are determined from the proton magnetic resonance spectra of benzene solutions. A hindered rotor treatment of the barrier to internal rotation about the C—Si bond, in conjunction with the coupling constants over six bonds, allows the deduction of the low-energy conformations for C6H5SiH(CH3)2 and for C6H5SiHCl2, as well as of barriers of 1.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. The approach becomes less reliable for C6H5SiH2CH3 and for C6H5SiH2Cl and, particularly for the latter compound, the derived barrier is very likely an upper limit only. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations of the conformational energies are reported for C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, and for C6H5SiHCl2.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra, Conformations, Spin Coupling Mechanisms, and INDO Molecular Orbital Calculations for the Monofluorobenzaldehydes and some Derivatives

1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (19) ◽  
pp. 3216-3228 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wasylishen ◽  
T. Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Coupling Parameters ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Spectra

Precise analyses of the proton and some fluorine magnetic resonance spectra in acetone solution are reported for the three monofluorobenzaldehydes as well as for 2-chloro-6-fluorobenzaldehyde and for 4-fluoro-2-nitrobenzaldehyde. The conformational dependence of the coupling parameters allows the measurement of energy differences between the O-cis and O-trans conformations. The energy differences are in better agreement with the INDO predictions than they are with energies derived from i.r. data. Di-pole moments are computed reliably and their measurement is suggested as a good guide to conformational preferences for molecules of this kind. The spin–spin coupling constants between the aldehyde proton and the ring protons and fluorine nuclei are computed for benzaldehyde and the three monofluorobenzaldehydes by the INDO and CNDO molecular orbital approximations. In many instances the agreement between calculated and observed couplings is quantitative.

Anisotropy of indirect spin–spin coupling constants from nuclear magnetic resonance powder patterns of rigid solids. 1J(31P,199Hg) in [HgP(o-tolyl)3(NO3)2]2

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1821-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn H. Penner ◽  
William P. Power ◽  
Roderick E. Wasylishen
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Coupling Constant ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Fermi Contact ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Contact Mechanism ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic

The anisotropy of the indirect 31P,199Hg spin–spin coupling constant, ΔJ, in solid [HgP(o-tolyl)3(NO3)2]2 is obtained from an analysis of the 31P nuclear magnetic resonance powder pattern. The value of ΔJ, 5170 ± 250 Hz, is large and indicates that mechanisms other than the Fermi contact mechanism are important for this spin–spin coupling. The powder spectrum also indicates that the absolute sign of 1J(31P,199Hg) is positive.

1H nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular orbital studies of 2-formylstyrene. Three significant nonplanar conformers at 300 K

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 2208-2216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Scott Kroeker ◽  
David M. McKinnon
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Formyl Group ◽  
Trans Conformer ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of 2-formylstyrene, from dilute solutions in CS2–C6DI2 and acetone-d6, are analyzed to yield precise chemical shifts and spin–spin coupling constants. The long-range coupling constants imply a conformational distribution in which the O-trans conformer is 55% abundant in both polar and nonpolar environments. They also imply that the vinyl group, on average, is twisted out of the aromatic plane to a much larger extent than in styrene. The 6-31G* basis set gives an ab initio potential for the torsion of the vinyl moiety with a relatively deep minimum at 38° out-of-plane, for the O-cis conformer. For the O-trans conformer, two minima are found, one at 45° and another at 129.6°. Essentially the same potential is obtained with the 6-31G** basis. The latter corresponds to a close approach of the hydrogen atom of the formyl group and π orbitals or the β-carbon atom of the olefinic side chain. This local minimum is interesting in terms of a hypothesis used to explain the photochemistry of the molecule. The long-range coupling constants are consistent with the conformational properties calculated for the free molecule; they also indicate no significant difference between the conformational behaviour of the molecule in the two solvents. A proximate coupling constant of −0.16 Hz exists between the formyl and methine (α) protons. The latter is strongly deshielded in the presence of the formyl group, so that it becomes even less shielded than some of the aromatic protons. Keywords: 1H NMR, 2-formylstyrene (o-vinylbenzaldehyde); long-range spin–spin coupling constants, 2-formylstyrene; conformations, three nonplanar of 2-formylstyrene; molecular orbital calculations, conformations of 2-formylstyrene.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document