KINETICS AND MECHANISMS OF REACTIONS CATALYZED BY PANCREATIC RIBONUCLEASE

1966 ◽  
Vol 44 (22) ◽  
pp. 2597-2610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen N. Ramsden ◽  
Keith J. Laidler
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Histidine Residue ◽  
Aspartic Acid Residue ◽  
Pyrimidine Base ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Imidazole Group ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Subsequent Hydrolysis ◽  
Mechanisms Of Reactions

A kinetic study has been made of the ribonuclease-catalyzed hydrolyses of three cyclic nucleotides, cytidine-2′,3′-phosphate, uridine-2′,3′-phosphate, and N6,O5′-diacetyl cytidine-2′,3′-phosphate. Rates were measured at pH values ranging from 6 to 8.5. The variation of the kinetic parameters with pH showed that the free enzyme possesses two active groups, having pK values of 5.4 and 7.25. When the enzyme–substrate complex is formed, the pK values of the groups are increased to 6.6 and 8.4. The pK values identify these groups as imidazole groups and show that two histidine residues are present at the active site. Since both increase in pK on complex formation, it is concluded that the acid imidazole group binds the substrate, but that the basic imidazole group cannot be concerned in substrate binding and must function only in the hydrolytic step. The results indicate that the pyrimidine base is concerned in the hydrolytic step and not solely in binding, as had been postulated. It is concluded from all of the evidence that four specific sites are present at the active center of the enzyme; three are involved in binding and one in catalysis. It is proposed that the active site of ribonuclease is composed of: the histidine residue in position 12, which catalyzes the hydrolytic step; the histidine residue in position 119, which binds the 2′-ribose oxygen atom in the substrate; the lysine residue in position 41, which binds the phosphate group or anion; and the aspartic acid residue in position 121, which binds the nitrogen atom at N1 in the pyrimidine base. A mechanism for enzyme–substrate complex formation and subsequent hydrolysis is proposed.

Effect of Modifiers on the Hydrolysis of Basic and Neutral Peptides by Carboxypeptidase B

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 747-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Moore ◽  
N. Leo Benoiton
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
Active Sites ◽  
Kinetic Behavior ◽  
Carboxypeptidase A ◽  
Phenyllactic Acid ◽  
Carboxypeptidase B ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Basic Peptides ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

The initial rates of hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Lys and Bz-Gly-Phe by carboxypeptidase B (CPB) are increased in the presence of the modifiers β-phenylpropionic acid, cyclohexanol, Bz-Gly, and Bz-Gly-Gly. The hydrolysis of the tripeptide Bz-Gly-Gly-Phe is also activated by Bz-Gly and Bz-Gly-Gly, but none of these modifiers activate the hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Gly-Lys, Z-Leu-Ala-Phe, or Bz-Gly-phenyllactic acid by CPB. All modifiers except cyclohexanol display inhibitory modes of binding when present in high concentration.Examination of Lineweaver–Burk plots in the presence of fixed concentrations of Bz-Gly has shown that activation of the hydrolysis of neutral and basic peptides by CPB, as reflected in the values of the extrapolated parameters, Km(app) and keat, occurs by different mechanisms. For Bz-Gly-Gly-Phe, activation occurs because the enzyme–modifier complex has a higher affinity than the free enzyme for the substrate, whereas activation of the hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Lys derives from an increase in the rate of breakdown of the enzyme–substrate complex to give products.Cyclohexanol differs from Bz-Gly and Bz-Gly-Gly in that it displays no inhibitory mode of binding with any of the substrates examined, activates only the hydrolysis of dipeptides by CPB, and has a greater effect on the hydrolysis of the basic dipeptide than on the neutral dipeptide. Moreover, when Bz-Gly-Lys is the substrate, cyclohexanol activates its hydrolysis by CPB by increasing both the enzyme–substrate binding affinity and the rate of the catalytic step, an effect different from that observed when Bz-Gly is the modifier.The anomalous kinetic behavior of CPB is remarkably similar to that of carboxypeptidase A, and is a good indication that both enzymes have very similar structures in and around their respective active sites. A binding site for activator molecules down the cleft of the active site is proposed for CPB to explain the observed kinetic behavior.

Human cholinesterases

2020 ◽  
pp. 63-120
Author(s):  
Sergey Varfolomeev ◽  
Bella Grigorenko ◽  
Sofya Lushchekina ◽  
Alexander Nemuchin
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
The Body ◽  
Polymorphic Modification ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Mechanism Of Hydrolysis ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Hydrolysis Of ◽  
Enzyme Reactivity

The work is devoted to modeling the elementary stages of the hydrolysis reaction in the active site of enzymes belonging to the class of cholinesterases — acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE). The study allowed to describe at the molecular level the effect of the polymorphic modification of BChE, causing serious physiolog ical consequences. Cholinesterase plays a crucial role in the human body. AChE is one of the key enzymes of the central nervous system, and BChE performs protective functions in the body. According to the results of calculations using the combined method of quantum and molecular mechanics (KM/MM), the mechanism of the hydrolysis of the native acetylcholine substrate in the AChE active center was detailed. For a series of ester substrates, a method for estimation of dependence of the enzyme reactivity on the structure of the substrate has been developed. The mechanism of hydrolysis of the muscle relaxant of succininylcholine BChE and the effect of the Asp70Gly polymorph on it were studied. Using various computer simulation methods, the stability of the enzyme-substrate complex of two enzyme variants with succinylcholine was studied.

Optical Biosensors Based on Enzyme-Substrate Complex Formation

1994 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
D.A. Moss ◽  
A. Ritter ◽  
W. Andlauer ◽  
H.J. Ache
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Optical Biosensors ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate

Destabilization is as important as binding

1993 ◽  
Vol 345 (1674) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Energy ◽  
Gibbs Energy ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Geometric Distortion ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Non Covalent Interactions ◽  
Covalent Interactions

Enzymes make use of non-covalent interactions with their substrates to bring about a large fraction of their catalytic activity. These interactions must destabilize, or increase the Gibbs energy, of the substrate in the active site in order that the transition state can be reached easily. This destabilization may be brought about by utilization of the intrinsic binding energy between the active site and the bound substrate by desolvation of charged groups, geometric distortion, electrostatic interactions and, especially, loss of entropy in the enzyme-substrate complex. These mechanisms are described by interaction energies and require utilization of the intrinsic binding energy that is realized from non-covalent interactions between the enzyme and substrate. Receptors and coupled vectorial processes, such as muscle contraction and active transport, utilize binding energy similarly to avoid large peaks and valleys along the Gibbs energy profile of the reaction under physiological conditions.

Essential Arginine Residues in Lactate Dehydrogenase from Germinating Soybean

1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Barthová ◽  
Irena Hulová ◽  
Miroslava Birčáková
Keyword(s):  
Enzyme Activity ◽  
Glycine Max ◽  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Chemical Modification ◽  
Active Site ◽  
Enzyme Modification ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Arginine Residues ◽  
Blue Sepharose

The lactate dehydrogenase was isolated from soybean (Glycine max. L.) by a procedure that employed biospecific chromatography on a column of Blue-Sepharose CL-6B. The participation of the guanidine group of arginine residues in the mechanism of enzyme action was determined through kinetic and chemical modification studies. The dependence of enzyme activity on pH was followed in the alkaline region (pH 8.6 - 12.8). The pK values found were 12.4 for the enzyme substrate complex and 11.1 for the free enzyme. The enzyme was inactivated by phenylglyoxal, 2,3-butanedione, 1,2-cyclohexanedione and p-hydroxyphenylglyoxal reagents used in modification experiments. Kinetic analysis of the modification indicated that one arginine residue is modified when inactivation occurs. No effect was observed on the rate of inactivation upon addition of coenzyme. The extent of enzyme modification by p-hydroxyphenylglyoxal was determined. It appears there are at least two arginine residues in the active site of the enzyme.

Total Enzyme-substrate Complex Which Includes Product-destined Enzyme-substrate Complex

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ikechukwu I. Udema
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Free Enzyme ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Continuous Formation ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Total Enzyme

Background: There is no much interest in the determination of total enzyme-substrate complex concentration ([ES]T) which includes undissociated ES that is unaccounted for unlike the usual ES destined for transformation into free enzyme and product or substrate. The reason is speculatively as a result of the lack of awareness of such possibility via sequestration. Objectives: 1) To derive on the basis of both reverse – and standard – quasi-steady – state assumptions equations for the determination of [ES]T which is not restricted to the complex which dissociates to product/substrate and free enzyme and 2) quantitate the value of [ES]T. Methods: A theoretical research and experimentation using Bernfeld method to determine velocities of amylolysis with which to calculate relevant parameters. Results: The [EST] is < [E] ( i. e. [ET] - [ES]); [EST] decreased with increasing [ST] and increased with increasing concentration of enzyme [ET] while the velocity of amylolysis, v and maximum velocity of amylolysis, vmax expectedly increased with increasing [ET] and [ST]. Conclusion: The equations for the determination of the total enzyme-substrate complex, free enzyme without any complex formation before and after dissociation of enzyme-complex into product and/or substrate and free enzyme were derived. The difference, [ET] - [ES] is a heterogeneous mixture of undissociated ES and free enzyme without any complex formation. This is the case because [ES] which dissociates into product is only a part of the total enzyme-substrate complex. There is a continuous formation of ES during and at the expiry of the duration of assay as long as there is no total substrate depletion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document