Evaluation of geotechnical property variability

1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kok-Kwang Phoon ◽  
Fred H Kulhawy
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Measurement Error ◽  
Young’S Modulus ◽  
Young's Modulus ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Stress Coefficient ◽  
Undrained Shear

To evaluate geotechnical variability on a general basis that will facilitate the use of reliability-based design procedures, it is necessary to assess inherent soil variability, measurement error, and transformation uncertainty separately. The inherent variability and measurement error are addressed in a companion paper, and transformation uncertainty is addressed herein. A second-moment probabilistic approach is applied to combine these uncertainties consistently based on the manner in which the design soil property is derived. The design properties considered in this paper are undrained shear strength, effective stress friction angle, in situ horizontal stress coefficient, and Young's modulus. This paper concludes with specific guidelines on the typical coefficients of variation for these common design soil properties as a function of the test type and the type of correlation used.Key words: transformation uncertainty, undrained shear strength, friction angle, in situ horizontal stress coefficient, Young's modulus, geotechnical variability.

scholarly journals UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS OF SAPROCK FROM A WEATHERING PROFILE OVER PORPHYRITIC BIOTITE GRANITE AT KM 31 OF THE KUALA LUMPUR - KARAK HIGHWAY, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kuna Raj
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Friction Angle ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Triaxial Tests ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Shear Strength Parameters ◽  
Weathering Profile ◽  
Strength Parameters ◽  
Zone Ii ◽  
Undrained Shear

Three broad zones can be differentiated at the weathering profile; an upper, 9.4 m thick, pedological soil (zone I), an intermediate, 31.7 m thick, saprock (zone II) and the bottom bedrock (zone III). The saprock (zone II) comprises gravelly silty sands that distinctly preserve the minerals, textures and structures of the original granite and can be separated into sub-zones II A, II B, II C, and II D, based on differences in preservation of relict structures and content of litho-relicts (core-boulders). To characterize the undrained strength of saprock, samples were collected from sub-zones II A, II B, II C and II D and their physical and soil index properties determined before unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests were carried out on remolded samples. Three to four individual samples from each sub-zone were compressed under confining pressures of 138 kPa, 207 kPa, 276 kPa and/or 345 kPa. Plots of pf = [(σ1 + σ3)/2] versus qf = [(σ1 - σ3)/2] were then used to calculate apparent cohesions of 41.9 kPa, 100.3 kPa, 76.1 kPa and 73.9 kPa, and friction angles of 32.2o, 28.1o, 26.6o and 27.8o, for the samples from sub-zones II A, II B, II C, and II D, respectively. Regression analyses show apparent cohesions to decrease with increasing clay contents, and degrees of saturation; features indicating the influence of negative pore water (or suction) pressures. Regression analyses also show apparent friction angle to increase with increasing sand contents; a feature attributed to greater inter-locking and resistance to displacement of these particles. It is concluded that the undrained shear strength parameters of saprock are characterized by an average apparent cohesion of 54.6 kPa, and friction angle of 30.5o; the parameters influenced by the degree of saturation as well as clay and sand contents.

Pulling capacity of concrete cast in situ bored piles

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Sowa
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Sandy Soil ◽  
Empirical Relationship ◽  
Sandy Soils ◽  
Undrained Shear Strength ◽  
Cohesive Soils ◽  
Concrete Piles ◽  
Bored Piles ◽  
Undrained Shear

The pulling capacity of cylindrical concrete piles cast in situ in bored holes is examined for piles constructed in sandy or cohesive soils. On the basis of the data presented, it is concluded that the pulling capacity of these piles in cohesive soils can be estimated approximately, while the pulling capacity of piles in sandy soil is considerably more difficult to estimate. Estimating the pulling capacity of piles in cohesive soils is based on an empirical relationship between soil adhesion and the undrained shear strength. A possible explanation for the difficulty in estimating the pulling capacity of piles in sandy soils is suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document