Flexibility coefficients and interaction factors for pile group analysis

1986 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahaa El Sharnouby ◽  
Milos Novak

Flexibility coefficients of single piles and interaction factors established for groups of two piles are presented to facilitate analysis of arbitrary pile groups exposed to static horizontal loads. Such an analysis may yield pile group flexibility, stiffness, deflection, and distribution of loads on individual piles. The data given are complete in that they include horizontal translation, rotation in the vertical plane, and cross effects between the two, making it possible to establish complete stiffness and flexibility matrices of pile groups provided with either rigid caps or arbitrarily flexible caps. Homogeneous, parabolic, and linear (Gibson's) soil profiles are considered and the piles may have a free length sticking above the ground surface. The methods of group evaluation based on superposition of interaction factors are reviewed and compared and numerical examples are given. Key words: piles, pile groups, lateral loads, flexibility, stiffness, load distribution.

1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 813-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahaa El Sharnouby ◽  
Milos Novak

Stiffness constants and flexibility coefficients of single piles and interaction factors are presented to facilitate the analysis of pile groups subjected to static vertical loads. A continuous transition from friction to end-bearing piles is accounted for. A new type of interaction factor, established from subgroups of five piles, is introduced for end-bearing piles. This interaction factor allows for the stiffening effect of the piles occurring between the two reference piles. This feature improves the accuracy of group analysis for end-bearing piles. Numerical results for axially loaded single piles and pile groups are presented for a wide range of pile and soil parameters. The results are applicable toboth rigid and flexible caps. Key words: piles, pile group, settlement, interaction


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 800
Author(s):  
Miloš Marjanović ◽  
Mirjana Vukićević ◽  
Diethard König

Marine and harbor structures, wind turbines, bridges, offshore platforms, industrial chimneys, retaining structures etc. can be subjected to significant lateral loads from various sources. Appropriate assessment of the foundations capacity of these structures is thus necessary, especially when these structures are supported by pile groups. The pile group interaction effects under lateral loading have been investigated intensively in past decades, and the most of the conducted studies have considered lateral loading that acts along one of the two orthogonal directions, parallel to the edge of pile group. However, because of the stochastic nature of its source, the horizontal loading on the pile group may have arbitrary direction. The number of studies dealing with the pile groups under arbitrary loading is very limited. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of the arbitrary lateral loading on the pile group response, in order to improve (extend) the current design approach for laterally loaded pile groups. Free head, flexible bored piles in sand were analyzed through the extensive numerical study. The main hypothesis of the research is that some critical pile group configurations, loading directions, and soil conditions exist, which can lead to the unsafe structural design. Critical pile positions inside the commonly used pile group configurations are identified with respect to loading directions. The influence of different soil conditions was discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Rose ◽  
R.N. Taylor ◽  
M.H. El Naggar

The load distribution among piles in a group varies such that the inner piles often carry a smaller share of the total load compared to the outer piles, which is a result of increased soil–pile interaction. The main objective of this paper is to establish the relative effectiveness of pile groups with no inner piles (perimeter group), when compared to the more common grid configuration. The numerical investigation utilized the finite element programme ABAQUS and considered a range of variables that affect pile group behaviour including number of piles, pile spacing, length/diameter ratio, and soil strength. It was demonstrated that a complete grid group is less efficient than a perimeter group, where efficiency is defined as the load capacity of the whole group expressed as a ratio of the number of piles in the group multiplied by the load capacity of a single isolated pile. Efficiencies close to unity were observed for some perimeter groups. Perimeter groups also showed that a “block” type group failure could occur, where piles were placed at a spacing of less than 2.0 pile diameters,d, centre-to-centre. This often, but not always, led to a reduction in the efficiency of the pile group.


Author(s):  
Michael C. McVay ◽  
Limin Zhang ◽  
Sangjoon Han ◽  
Peter Lai

A series of lateral load tests were performed on 3×3 and 4×4 pile groups in loose and medium-dense sands in the centrifuge with their caps located at variable heights to the ground surface. Four cases were considered: Case 1, pile caps located above the ground surface; Case 2, bottom of pile cap in contact with the ground surface; Case 3, top of pile cap at the ground surface elevation; and Case 4, top of pile cap buried one cap thickness below ground surface. All tests with the exception of Case 1 of the 4×4 group had their pile tips located at the same elevation. A special device, which was capable of both driving the piles and raining sand on the group in flight, had to be constructed to perform the tests without stopping the centrifuge (spinning at 45 g). The tests revealed that lowering the pile cap elevation increased the lateral resistance of the pile group anywhere from 50 to 250 percent. The experimental results were subsequently modeled with the bridge foundation-superstructure finite element program FLPIER, which did a good job of predicting all the cases for different load levels without the need for soil–pile cap interaction springs (i.e., p-y springs attached to the cap). The analyses suggest that the increase in lateral resistance with lower cap elevations may be due to the lower center of rotation of the pile group. However, it should be noted that this study was for pile caps embedded in loose sand and not dense sands or at significant depths. The experiments also revealed a slight effect for the case of the pile cap embedded in sand with a footprint wider than the pile row. In that case the size of the passive soil wedge in front of the pile group, and consequently the group’s lateral resistance, increased.


1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 702-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans H. Vaziri ◽  
Yingcai Han

Dynamic response of a pile group, comprising six full-size cast-in-place reinforced concrete piles, is investigated under varying levels of lateral harmonic excitation in two directions: along a plane composed of three piles (X-direction) and along a plane normal to it composed of two piles (Y-direction). The measured response is compared with the theoretical predictions using the dynamic interaction factors approach. To account for the nonlinear response of the pile group using the theoretical model, provisions are made for yielding of soil around the piles by introducing the boundary-zone concept. It is shown that the proposed theory adequately captures the measured response of the pile group under both linear (weak excitation) and nonlinear (strong excitation) conditions. The study performed indicates that although the rocking stiffness of the pile group is strongly influenced by the number of piles along the direction of excitation, the horizontal stiffness remains virtually unaffected. The results obtained show that the stiffness and damping ratio of the pile group reduce as the excitation intensity increases. It is also found that the pile–soil–pile interaction plays a major role in the overall dynamic response of the pile group; this effect is manifested by a reduction in the stiffness and an increase in the damping of the pile group. Key words : dynamics, vibration, piles, pile group, nonlinear vibration, full-scale tests, modelling, resonance, soil separation, soil yielding.


1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (05) ◽  
pp. 775-783
Author(s):  
Glenn A. Kriger

Abstract A comprehensive set of guidelines for constructing linear models of single piles and pile groups for foundations of offshore structures is presented. These models are used as boundary conditions at the base of the superstructure, thus permitting independent analysis of the superstructure from its supporting foundation.This paper is a "how-to" text for piled foundation modeling. It is also of value to those in related disciplines, such as geotechnical specialists, who will gain insight into how their data is applied in analyzing structures supported by piled foundations. Discussions include the behavior and modeling of single piles and pile groups. Construction methods are presented for pile groups. Construction methods are presented for three types of pile models-matrix, springs, and equivalent pile. The advantages and disadvantages of each model type are described. Linear and nonlinear foundation behavior characteristics are treated in depth. Factors that influence the approach to a modeling problem are outlined. Emphasis is placed on providing the problem are outlined. Emphasis is placed on providing the reader with an understanding of the physical behavior of piled foundations and model construction. A step-by-step piled foundations and model construction. A step-by-step procedure for model synthesis is provided in an example. procedure for model synthesis is provided in an example. Introduction In a fixed offshore platform, the steel jacket superstructure and its supporting piled foundation are more conveniently analyzed if treated separately. There are major structural and behavior-al differences between the jacket and foundation, and the two do not lend themselves to similar analytical methods. This paper presents basic techniques for constructing linear models that simulate the foundation behavior at the superstructure/foundation boundary. Use of these models permits independent superstructure analyses. Selection of the model type and its degree of refinement are described from a global overview of the structure, available data, and ramification of analytical results. Construction of the foundation simulation model follows routine procedures using results of an independent foundation analysis. Single Pile Behavior The load-deflection behavior of a single pile crown is of key importance in model construction. Analysis of a pile embedded in soil is extremely difficult because of pile embedded in soil is extremely difficult because of the infinite dimensions, nonhomogeneity, and nonlinearity of the soil. As a practical necessity, the problem usually is simplified by treating the pile as a beam-column supported by nonlinear axial and lateral soil springs. Details of these analytical procedures are beyond the scope of this work, although application of the techniques presented here will require the availability of such an analytical tool. Although this material pertains to single piles, it forms the basis for understanding pertains to single piles, it forms the basis for understanding pile group behavior discussed later. pile group behavior discussed later. Fig. 1 depicts a right-hand orthogonal coordinate system, which is used throughout this paper. Displacements, s, and forces, F, are shown in each of the six degrees of freedom (DOF). The pile behavior is studied by observation of the force(s) required to produce displacement in each of the six DOF while all other displacements are held at zero. Of utmost importance is the effect of coupling-the interaction of forces (and displacements) in different DOF.First consider linear pile behavior, which is characteristic of small-magnitude loadings. Force and displacement are directly proportional; therefore, stiffness (force divided by displacement) remains constant for all values of displacement (Fig. 2).Fig. 3a shows that an axial displacement is produced by an axial force. This axial displacement requires no other forces in each of the remaining five DOF. Therefore, linear axial pile behavior is uncoupled. Similarly, a torsional displacement (Fig. 3b) requires only a torque along the same DOF and therefore is also lineally uncoupled. SPEJ p. 775


Author(s):  
Aaron S. Bradshaw ◽  
Lindsay Cullen ◽  
Zachary Miller

This paper presents the results of a field load test program used to investigate group effects on the pullout capacity of single-helix ‘deep’ helical piles/anchors in sand. The high tensile capacity and silent installation of helical piles has given them serious consideration as an alternative to conventional deep foundations and anchors for offshore renewable energy structures. New offshore applications may consider the use of groups of helical piles to resist structural loads. Group interaction effects are known to occur in helical piles but there is a scarcity of field data on groups in sands under tensile loading. This study involved the installation and load testing of single-helix 152-mm diameter round shaft piles and pile groups embedded in sand to depths of 12 and 18 helix diameters below the ground surface. The study was designed to explore the effects of close pile spacing, group configuration (i.e. number of piles), and soil strength as interpreted from Cone Penetration Test (CPT) resistance. The results showed group efficiencies ranging from about 0.6 to 1.0 at a horizontal spacing of 2 to 3 times the helix diameter in sands with friction angles of about 39 to 44 degrees. The data from this study may also be useful for calibration and validation of numerical models for further analysis of helical pile group interactions.


1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. Meyerhof

Previous analyses of the ultimate resistance and displacements of rigid piles under lateral loads and moments have been extended to the general case of eccentric and inclined loads on flexible piles by using the concept of effective embedment depths of equivalent rigid piles. Recent research on the behaviour of large model tests on instrumented rigid and flexible piles under eccentric and inclined loads in sand, clay, and layered soil is summarized. Reasonable agreement is found between observed and predicted behaviour. The proposed method of analysis is also supported by comparison with the results of many field case records of single piles and large pile groups under lateral loads indifferent types of soils. Key words : bearing capacity, displacement, eccentric loads, inclined loads, layered soil, pile.


2011 ◽  
Vol 261-263 ◽  
pp. 1499-1504
Author(s):  
Yuan Yi Zhao ◽  
Zhou Hong Tao

Based on Biot’s wave propagation equation and boundary conditions, this paper builds up pile group and soil system used for calculation in 3 dimension models, though mass conservative and motion equation. The results of ground surface movement are obtained under the effect of vertical dynamic force though Newmark direct integration. Compared with the measured results, the numerical outcomes conform accurately. The calculating results show that vibration of ground surface can be affected by several parameters such as soils’ possion ratio, permeability coefficient, different types of pile groups and so on. Different factors have different effects on ground’s surface vibration in both far field and near field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document