Mass Radius of the Nucleon

1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1163-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Hare ◽  
G. Papini
Keyword(s):  
Mass Distribution ◽  
Intermediate State ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Dispersion Relations ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
State Expansion ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
The Mean

The mean radius of the mass distribution of the nucleon is determined to be [Formula: see text]. The calculation makes use of sidewise, unsubtracted, threshold dominated dispersion relations for the form factors appearing in the matrix elements of the contracted energy–momentum tensor. It uses a π meson–nucleon intermediate state expansion.

Some QCD/gravity intersections

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (28n29) ◽  
pp. 1645032
Author(s):  
O. V. Teryaev
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Principle ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
Lattice Data ◽  
Hadron Structure ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Dimensional Gravity ◽  
Quark Transverse Momentum

Gravitational form factors are the matrix elements of the Belinfante energy momentum tensor (EMT) which naturally incorporate the hadron structure and the equivalence principle. The relocalization property allowing to transform EMT to the Belinfante form provides the “kinematical” counterpart of the famous [Formula: see text] problem. The equivalence principle may be approximately valid for quarks and gluons separately in non-perturbative (NP)QCD, and this conjecture is supported by the experimental and lattice data. The extra-dimensional gravity leading to holographic AdS/QCD is supporting the relation of quark transverse momentum to the Regge slope, discovered by V.N. Gribov.

scholarly journals Rigorous constraints on the matrix elements of the energy–momentum tensor

2017 ◽  
Vol 774 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lowdon ◽  
Kelly Yu-Ju Chiu ◽  
Stanley J. Brodsky
Keyword(s):  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
The Matrix

scholarly journals Nucleon’s energy–momentum tensor form factors in light-cone QCD

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Azizi ◽  
U. Özdem
Keyword(s):  
Perturbation Theory ◽  
Lattice Qcd ◽  
Chiral Perturbation Theory ◽  
Light Cone ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Tensor Form ◽  
Chiral Perturbation ◽  
Theoretical Predictions

Abstract We use the energy–momentum tensor (EMT) current to compute the EMT form factors of the nucleon in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rule formalism. In the calculations, we employ the most general form of the nucleon’s interpolating field and use the distribution amplitudes (DAs) of the nucleon with two sets of the numerical values of the main input parameters entering the expressions of the DAs. The directly obtained results from the sum rules for the form factors are reliable at $$ Q^2\ge 1$$Q2≥1 GeV$$^2 $$2: to extrapolate the results to include the zero momentum transfer squared with the aim of estimation of the related static physical quantities, we use some fit functions for the form factors. The numerical computations show that the energy–momentum tensor form factors of the nucleon can be well fitted to the multipole fit form. We compare the results obtained for the form factors at $$ Q^2=0 $$Q2=0 with the existing theoretical predictions as well as experimental data on the gravitational form factor d$$_1^q(0)$$1q(0). For the form factors M$$_2^q (0)$$2q(0) and J$$^q(0)$$q(0) a consistency among the theoretical predictions is seen within the errors: our results are nicely consistent with the Lattice QCD and chiral perturbation theory predictions. However, there are large discrepancies among the theoretical predictions on d$$_1^q(0)$$1q(0). Nevertheless, our prediction is in accord with the JLab data as well as with the results of the Lattice QCD, chiral perturbation theory and KM15-fit. Our fit functions well define most of the JLab data in the interval $$ Q^2\in [0,0.4]$$Q2∈[0,0.4] GeV$$^2 $$2, while the Lattice results suffer from large uncertainties in this region. As a by-product, some mechanical properties of the nucleon like the pressure and energy density at the center of nucleon as well as its mechanical radius are also calculated and their results are compared with other existing theoretical predictions.

Causal amplitudes and the Yang-Feldman formalism

1957 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 843-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Polkinghorne
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
Green’S Functions ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Dispersion Relations ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Commutation Relations ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Free Fields ◽  
Set Up

ABSTRACTThe Yang-Feldman formalism vising the Feynman-like Green's functions is set up. The corresponding free fields have non-trivial commutation relations and contain information about the scattering. S-matrix elements are simply the matrix elements of anti-normal products of the field φF′(x). These are evaluated, and they give directly expressions used in the theory of causality and dispersion relations. It is possible to formulate field theory in a form in which the fields obey free field equations and the effects of interaction are contained in their commutation relations.

scholarly journals D → π and D → K semileptonic form factors with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions

2018 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 13026
Author(s):  
Vittorio Lubicz ◽  
Lorenzo Riggio ◽  
Giorgio Salerno ◽  
Silvano Simula ◽  
Cecilia Tarantino
Keyword(s):  
Pion Mass ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Kinematical Region ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
Scalar Form ◽  
Mass Collaboration ◽  
Twisted Mass ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Additional Form

We present a lattice determination of the vector and scalar form factors of the D → π(K)lv semileptonic decays, which are relevant for the extraction of the CKM matrix elements |Vcd| and |Vcs| from experimental data. Our analysis is based on the gauge configurations produced by the European Twisted Mass Collaboration with Nf = 2 + 1 +1 flavors of dynamical quarks. We simulated at three different values of the lattice spacing and with pion masses as small as 210 MeV. The matrix elements of both vector and scalar currents are determined for a plenty of kinematical conditions in which parent and child mesons are either moving or at rest. Lorentz symmetry breaking due to hypercubic effects is clearly observed in the data and included in the decomposition of the current matrix elements in terms of additional form factors. After the extrapolations to the physical pion mass and to the continuum limit the vector and scalar form factors are determined in the whole kinematical region from q2 = 0 up to [see formula in PDF] accessible in the experiments, obtaining a good overall agreement with experiments, except in the region at high values of q2 where some deviations are visible.

Form Factors and Correlation Functions

2020 ◽  
pp. 744-788
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Mussardo
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Functions ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Vacuum Expectation ◽  
Bound State ◽  
Kernel Functions ◽  
Energy Tensor ◽  
Matrix Elements ◽  
Stress Energy ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Recursive Equations

At the heart of a quantum field theory are the correlation functions of the various fields. In the case of integrable models, the correlators can be expressed in terms of the spectral series based on the matrix elements on the asymptotic states. These matrix elements, also known as form factors, satisfy a set of functional and recursive equations that can exactly solved in many cases of physical interest. Chapter 19 covers general properties of form factors, Faddeev–Zamolodchikov algebra, symmetric polynomials, kinematical and bound state poles, the operator space and kernel functions, the stress-energy tensor and vacuum expectation values and the Ising model in a magnetic field.

scholarly journals Energy–momentum tensor form factors of the nucleon in nuclear matter

2012 ◽  
Vol 718 (2) ◽  
pp. 625-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Chul Kim ◽  
Peter Schweitzer ◽  
Ulugbek Yakhshiev
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Matter ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Form Factors ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Tensor Form
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document