ASYMMETRY IN THE RECOVERY FROM A VERY DEEP FORBUSH-TYPE DECREASE IN COSMIC-RAY INTENSITY

1961 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Rose ◽  
S. M. Lapointe

The intensity–time curves for cosmic rays recorded at some 30 stations distributed all over the world are examined for structure in the recovery period from the third in a series of three closely spaced Forbush-type decreases which occurred in the middle of July 1959. It is shown that the structure of intensity peaks is regular and that these occur at each station at the same effective local time. It is found that this is consistent with the hypothesis that recovery from a very deep Forbush-type decrease is first apparent in directions making 15° and 165° with the sun–earth line respectively. The analyses suggest further, that during recovery from this deep Forbush decrease temporary openings appeared in the intensity depressing mechanism which allowed intensity increases in limited directions.

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (S257) ◽  
pp. 439-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Belov

AbstractForbush decrease (or, in a broader sense, Forbush effect) - is a storm in cosmic rays, which is a part of heliospheric storm and very often observed simultaneously with a geomagnetic storm. Disturbances in the solar wind, magnetosphere and cosmic rays are closely interrelated and caused by the same active processes on the Sun. Thus, it is natural and useful to investigate them together. Such an investigation in the present work is based on the characteristics of cosmic rays with rigidity of 10 GV. The results are derived using data from the world wide neutron monitor network and are combined with relevant information into a data base on Forbush effects and large interplanetary disturbances.


1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1207-1215
Author(s):  
J. Katzman

The cosmic ray intensity as measured with an extremely narrow-angle telescope, 1.2 × 10−3 steradians, and with 96 inches of lead as absorber for the period 1 January 1955 to 31 December 1958 shows an increase of 20%. This increase is attributed to particles coming from the sun. It is shown that the change in hour of maximum of the first and second harmonics can be explained by a change in the relative importance of the impact zones. This phenomenon is attributed to a change in the number and polarity of sunspots.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Rodgers-Lee ◽  
Aline Vidotto ◽  
Andrew Taylor ◽  
Paul Rimmer ◽  
Turlough Downes

<p>Cosmic rays may have contributed to the start of life on Earth. Cosmic rays also influence and contribute to atmospheric electrical circuits, cloud cover and biological mutation rates which are important for the characterisation of exoplanetary systems. The flux of Galactic cosmic rays present at the time when life is thought to have begun on the young Earth or in other young exoplanetary systems is largely determined by the properties of the stellar wind. </p> <p>The spectrum of Galactic cosmic rays that we observe at Earth is modulated, or suppressed, by the magnetised solar wind and thus differs from the local interstellar spectrum observed by Voyager 1 and 2 outside of the solar system. Upon reaching 1au, Galactic cosmic rays subsequently interact with the Earth’s magnetosphere and some of their energy is deposited in the upper atmosphere. The properties of the solar wind, such as the magnetic field strength and velocity profile, evolve with time. Generally, young solar-type stars are very magnetically active and are therefore thought to drive stronger stellar winds. </p> <p>Here I will present our recent results which simulate the propagation of Galactic cosmic rays through the heliosphere to the location of Earth as a function of the Sun's life, from 600 Myr to 6 Gyr, in the Sun’s future. I will specifically focus on the flux of Galactic cosmic rays present at the time when life is thought to have started on Earth (~1 Gyr). I will show that the intensity of Galactic cosmic rays which reached the young Earth, by interacting with the solar wind, would have been greatly reduced in comparison to the present day intensity. I will also discuss the effect that the Sun being a slow/fast rotator would have had on the flux of cosmic rays reaching Earth at early times in the solar system's life.</p> <p>Despite the importance of Galactic cosmic rays, their chemical signature in the atmospheres’ of young Earth-like exoplanets may not be observable with instruments in the near future. On the other hand, it may instead be possible to detect their chemical signature by observing young warm Jupiters. Thus, I will also discuss the HR 2562b exoplanetary system as a candidate for observing the chemical signature of Galactic cosmic rays in a young exoplanetary atmosphere with upcoming missions such as JWST.</p>


1958 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 377-385
Author(s):  
V. Sarabhai ◽  
N. W. Nerurkar ◽  
S. P. Duggal ◽  
T. S. G. Sastry

Study of the anisotropy of cosmic rays from the measurement of the daily variation of meson intensity has demonstrated that there are significant day-today changes in the anisotropy of the radiation. New experimental data pertaining to these changes and their solar and terrestrial relationships are discussed.An interpretation of these changes of anisotropy in terms of the modulation of cosmic rays by streams of matter emitted by the sun is given. In particular, an explanation for the existence of the recently discovered types of daily variations exhibiting day and night maxima respectively, can be found by an extension of some ideas of Alfvén, Nagashima, and Davies. An integrated attempt is made to interpret the known features of the variation of cosmic ray intensity in conformity with ideas developed above.


1969 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
R Anda ◽  
B Aparicio ◽  
LV Sud ◽  
M Zubieta

At different times during a period of continuous recording of cosmic rays large increases in the intensity of cosmic radiation have been observed. Most of these are associated with formations on the visible side of the Sun. However, there are two exceptions: Carmichael et al. (1961) believe that the November 20,1960 increase in intensity was due to a solar flare on the reverse side of the Sun, and Sud (1968) has shown that the intensity increase of January 28,1967 also may not be connected with chromospheric eruptions on the visible side of the Sun.


1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S854-S858 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mathews ◽  
J. B. Mercer ◽  
D. Venkatesan

A study of the Forbush decrease of 23 September 1966 shows that the predecrease anisotropy developed from a direction 85° to the west of the sun–earth line. The rate of development of the anisotropy suggests that the "turbulent" plasma producing the Forbush decrease occupied a volume of diameter ≈0.2–0.3 AU. If the plasma clouds away from the earth produced the anisotropy at the earth, then it is reasonable to attribute a part of the highly variable daily variation in cosmic-ray intensity to such distant scattering centers.


1971 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. D. Desai

Earlier studies have interpreted the Forbush decrease of 23 September 1966 in terms of two phases; an initial predecrease and a later worldwide decrease. This interpretation precluded the possibility of correlation with a concurrent magnetic storm and led to an explanation of the predecrease (Mathews et al. 1968) in terms of a shadow cast by a distant plasma cloud approaching from a direction 85° to the west of the sun–earth line.In the present study, particle and magnetic field data from satellite-borne detectors and ground-based neutron monitors clearly show the onset of the Forbush decrease coincident with the SSC magnetic storm. It is pointed out that the Forbush decrease arises from a corotating shock front approaching from the east of the sun–earth line and is not associated with any solar flare effect. Further, the increases observed by the various neutron monitors 9 h after the onset of the Forbush decrease are interpreted to be an enhancement of the diurnal anisotropy. An example of an increase in intensity in the IMP 3 detector arising from electron contributions is also pointed out.


1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S879-S882 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Chaeakhchyan ◽  
T. N. Charakhchyan

Almost the whole increase in the cosmic-ray intensity in the stratosphere during the period of decreasing solar activity (1960–64) was composed of a number of individual events occurring at intervals of 6–12 months. This phenomenon is almost entirely due to the corresponding decrease of solar activity (according to the sunspot number).Several interesting cases were found when solar-activity decreases to a new stationary level took place rapidly (within several days). After such events the cosmic-ray intensity gradually increased to reach a stationary level over a period of about two months. The time, tst, during which the cosmic-ray intensity in interplanetary space (after the above-mentioned events on the sun) approaches a stationary value is about 40, 60, and 80 days according to observations in 1961, 1963, and 1964 respectively.Some results have been obtained on the large-scale magnetic "clouds" which modulate the galactic cosmic rays in interplanetary space: (a) The velocity of propagation of these magnetic clouds is [Formula: see text]. According to the data on u and tst the radius of the sphere around the sun, r, within which the cosmic rays are modulated depends little on solar activity and is equal to 10–15 AU. (b) The density of magnetic clouds in space is either independent of the distance to the sun or decreases less rapidly than the inverse square law suggested by conservation of clouds.[Formula: see text]


1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S823-S824
Author(s):  
S. N. Vernov ◽  
A. N. Charakhchyan ◽  
T. N. Charakhchyan ◽  
Yu. J. Stozhkov

The results of the analysis of data obtained from measurements carried out by means of regular stratospheric launchings of cosmic-ray radiosondes over the Murmansk region and the Antarctic observatory in Mirny in 1963–66 are presented. The problem of the anisotropy of the primary component of low-energy cosmic rays and of temperature effects on the cosmic-ray intensity in the atmosphere are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document