Regulation of gene expression in oncogenically transformed cells

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 980-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Dehbi ◽  
Pierre-André Bédard
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cell Transformation ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Constitutive Expression ◽  
Transformed Cells ◽  
Extracellular Proteases ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Genes Encoding

Several genes expressed in response to growth factors are also regulated aberrantly in oncogenically transformed cells. The constitutive expression of genes encoding extracellular proteases, transcription factors, and cytokines is often correlated with cell transformation. In several instances, the uncontrolled expression of these genes is the result of transcriptional activation. Therefore, much attention has been devoted to the study of promoter function in transformed cells. We now review the results of recent investigations on transformation-dependent gene expression. The activation of several transcription factors in oncogenically- transformed cells is described. Results regarding the regulation of promoters through PRD II/κB are presented for cells transformed by a variety of oncogenes. Finally, we discuss the significance of transcription factor activation in the process of cell transformation.Key words: oncogenes, transcription factors, transformation, pp60v-src.

Manganese transport and its regulation in bacteria

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 768-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bhattacharyya-Pakrasi ◽  
H. B. Pakrasi ◽  
T. Ogawa ◽  
R. Aurora
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Calcium Ions ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Zinc Transport ◽  
Synechocystis 6803 ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Manganese Transport

Regulation of manganese acquisition by bacteria occurs by both biochemical regulation of the activity of the transporters and transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Structural analysis suggests that calcium ions may regulate the function of an Mn ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-permease in Synechocystis 6803, a cyanobacterium, as well as in a number of other bacteria. The expression of genes encoding the manganese transporter in Synechocystis 6803 is regulated by a twocomponent signal-transduction mechanism that has not been previously observed for manganese and zinc transport in bacteria.

scholarly journals Activation of Transcription by Metabolic Intermediates of the Pyrimidine Biosynthetic Pathway

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 882-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Flynn ◽  
Richard J. Reece
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Biosynthetic Pathway ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Transcriptional Activator Protein ◽  
Genes Encoding

ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to pyrimidine starvation by increasing the expression of four URA genes, encoding the enzymes of de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis, three- to eightfold. The increase in gene expression is dependent on a transcriptional activator protein, Ppr1p. Here, we investigate the mechanism by which the transcriptional activity of Ppr1p responds to the level of pyrimidine biosynthetic intermediates. We find that purified Ppr1p is unable to promote activation of transcription in an in vitro system. Transcriptional activation by Ppr1p can be observed, however, if either dihydroorotic acid (DHO) or orotic acid (OA) is included in the transcription reactions. The transcriptional activation function and the DHO/OA-responsive element of Ppr1p localize to the carboxyl-terminal 134 amino acids of the protein. Thus, Ppr1p directly senses the level of early pyrimidine biosynthetic intermediates within the cell and activates the expression of genes encoding proteins required later in the pathway. These results are discussed in terms of (i) regulation of the pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway and (ii) a novel mechanism of regulating gene expression.

Factors regulating lactoferrin gene expressionThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 7th International Conference on Lactoferrin: Structure, Function, and Applications, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina T. Teng
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Lactoferrin Gene

Regulation of gene expression by nuclear receptors and transcription factors involves the concerted action of multiple proteins. The process of transcriptional activation involves chromatin modification, nuclear receptor or transcription factor binding to the response element of the promoter, and coregulator recruitment. Despite advances in knowledge pertaining to the molecular mechanisms of gene regulation overall, there is very limited information available on the molecular mechanism of lactoferrin gene regulation. This review will outline novel information relating to general gene regulation and will discuss the current understanding of the regulation of lactoferrin gene expression by nuclear receptors and transcription factors.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals Transcription Factors as the “Blitzkrieg” of Plant Defense: A Pragmatic View of Nitric Oxide’s Role in Gene Regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 522
Author(s):  
Noreen Falak ◽  
Qari Muhammad Imran ◽  
Adil Hussain ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Plant Defense ◽  
Systemic Acquired Resistance ◽  
Defense Mechanism ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Transcriptional Changes

Plants are in continuous conflict with the environmental constraints and their sessile nature demands a fine-tuned, well-designed defense mechanism that can cope with a multitude of biotic and abiotic assaults. Therefore, plants have developed innate immunity, R-gene-mediated resistance, and systemic acquired resistance to ensure their survival. Transcription factors (TFs) are among the most important genetic components for the regulation of gene expression and several other biological processes. They bind to specific sequences in the DNA called transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) that are present in the regulatory regions of genes. Depending on the environmental conditions, TFs can either enhance or suppress transcriptional processes. In the last couple of decades, nitric oxide (NO) emerged as a crucial molecule for signaling and regulating biological processes. Here, we have overviewed the plant defense system, the role of TFs in mediating the defense response, and that how NO can manipulate transcriptional changes including direct post-translational modifications of TFs. We also propose that NO might regulate gene expression by regulating the recruitment of RNA polymerase during transcription.

scholarly journals Interplay between cofactors and transcription factors in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wang ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
Yanan Li ◽  
Hongling Peng ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Hematologic Disorders ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractHematopoiesis requires finely tuned regulation of gene expression at each stage of development. The regulation of gene transcription involves not only individual transcription factors (TFs) but also transcription complexes (TCs) composed of transcription factor(s) and multisubunit cofactors. In their normal compositions, TCs orchestrate lineage-specific patterns of gene expression and ensure the production of the correct proportions of individual cell lineages during hematopoiesis. The integration of posttranslational and conformational modifications in the chromatin landscape, nucleosomes, histones and interacting components via the cofactor–TF interplay is critical to optimal TF activity. Mutations or translocations of cofactor genes are expected to alter cofactor–TF interactions, which may be causative for the pathogenesis of various hematologic disorders. Blocking TF oncogenic activity in hematologic disorders through targeting cofactors in aberrant complexes has been an exciting therapeutic strategy. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the models and functions of cofactor–TF interplay in physiological hematopoiesis and highlight their implications in the etiology of hematological malignancies. This review presents a deep insight into the physiological and pathological implications of transcription machinery in the blood system.

scholarly journals ARID2 Chromatin Remodeler in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 2152
Author(s):  
Robin Loesch ◽  
Linda Chenane ◽  
Sabine Colnot
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Chromatin Remodeler ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Gene Alterations

Chromatin remodelers are found highly mutated in cancer including hepatocellular carcinoma. These mutations frequently occur in ARID (AT-rich Interactive Domain) genes, encoding subunits of the ATP-dependent SWI/SNF remodelers. The increasingly prevalent complexity that surrounds the functions and specificities of the highly modular BAF (BG1/BRM-associated factors) and PBAF (polybromo-associated BAF) complexes, including ARID1A/B or ARID2, is baffling. The involvement of the SWI/SNF complexes in diverse tissues and processes, and especially in the regulation of gene expression, multiplies the specific outcomes of specific gene alterations. A better understanding of the molecular consequences of specific mutations impairing chromatin remodelers is needed. In this review, we summarize what we know about the tumor-modulating properties of ARID2 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

scholarly journals In VivoStudies Suggest that Induction of VanS-Dependent Vancomycin Resistance Requires Binding of the Drug to d-Ala-d-Ala Termini in the Peptidoglycan Cell Wall

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 4470-4480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Jung Kwun ◽  
Gabriela Novotna ◽  
Andrew R. Hesketh ◽  
Lionel Hill ◽  
Hee-Jeon Hong
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Streptomyces Coelicolor ◽  
Constitutive Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Peptidoglycan Cell Wall

ABSTRACTVanRS two-component regulatory systems are key elements required for the transcriptional activation of inducible vancomycin resistance genes in bacteria, but the precise nature of the ligand signal that activates these systems has remained undefined. Using the resistance system inStreptomyces coelicoloras a model, we have undertaken a series ofin vivostudies which indicate that the VanS sensor kinase in VanB-type resistance systems is activated by vancomycin in complex with thed-alanyl-d-alanine (d-Ala-d-Ala) termini of cell wall peptidoglycan (PG) precursors. Complementation of an essentiald-Ala-d-Ala ligase activity by constitutive expression ofvanAencoding a bifunctionald-Ala-d-Ala andd-alanyl-d-lactate (d-Ala-d-Lac) ligase activity allowed construction of strains that synthesized variable amounts of PG precursors containingd-Ala-d-Ala. Assays quantifying the expression of genes under VanRS control showed that the response to vancomycin in these strains correlated with the abundance ofd-Ala-d-Ala-containing PG precursors; strains producing a lower proportion of PG precursors terminating ind-Ala-d-Ala consistently exhibited a lower response to vancomycin. Pretreatment of wild-type cells with vancomycin or teicoplanin to saturate and mask thed-Ala-d-Ala binding sites in nascent PG also blocked the transcriptional response to subsequent vancomycin exposure, and desleucyl vancomycin, a vancomycin analogue incapable of interacting withd-Ala-d-Ala residues, failed to inducevangene expression. Activation of resistance by a vancomycin–d-Ala-d-Ala PG complex predicts a limit to the proportion of PG that can be derived from precursors terminating ind-Ala-d-Lac, a restriction also enforced by the bifunctional activity of the VanA ligase.

scholarly journals Fos and jun cooperate in transcriptional regulation via heterologous activation domains.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 5532-5535 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Abate ◽  
D Luk ◽  
E Gagne ◽  
R G Roeder ◽  
T Curran
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Stimulation

The products of c-fos and c-jun (Fos and Jun) function in gene regulation by interacting with the AP-1 binding site. Here we have examined the contribution of Fos and Jun toward transcriptional activity by using Fos and Jun polypeptides purified from Escherichia coli. Fos contained a transcriptional activation domain as well as a region which exerted a negative influence on transcriptional activity in vitro. Moreover, distinct activation domains in both Fos and Jun functioned cooperatively in transcriptional stimulation. Thus, regulation of gene expression by Fos and Jun results from an integration of several functional domains in a bimolecular complex.

scholarly journals Global impacts of chromosomal imbalance on gene expression in Arabidopsis and other taxa

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (48) ◽  
pp. E11321-E11330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Hou ◽  
Xiaowen Shi ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Md. Soliman Islam ◽  
Adam F. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Leaf Tissue ◽  
Global Gene Expression ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Chromosomal Imbalance ◽  
Regulatory Processes ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Global Impacts

Changes in dosage of part of the genome (aneuploidy) have long been known to produce much more severe phenotypic consequences than changes in the number of whole genomes (ploidy). To examine the basis of these differences, global gene expression in mature leaf tissue for all five trisomies and in diploids, triploids, and tetraploids of Arabidopsis thaliana was studied. The trisomies displayed a greater spread of expression modulation than the ploidy series. In general, expression of genes on the varied chromosome ranged from compensation to dosage effect, whereas genes from the remainder of the genome ranged from no effect to reduced expression approaching the inverse level of chromosomal imbalance (2/3). Genome-wide DNA methylation was examined in each genotype and found to shift most prominently with trisomy 4 but otherwise exhibited little change, indicating that genetic imbalance is generally mechanistically unrelated to DNA methylation. Independent analysis of gene functional classes demonstrated that ribosomal, proteasomal, and gene body methylated genes were less modulated compared with all classes of genes, whereas transcription factors, signal transduction components, and organelle-targeted protein genes were more tightly inversely affected. Comparing transcription factors and their targets in the trisomies and in expression networks revealed considerable discordance, illustrating that altered regulatory stoichiometry is a major contributor to genetic imbalance. Reanalysis of published data on gene expression in disomic yeast and trisomic mouse cells detected similar stoichiometric effects across broad phylogenetic taxa, and indicated that these effects reflect normal gene regulatory processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document