Irradiations of rabbit myofibrils with an ultraviolet microbeam. II. Phalloidin protects actin in solution but not in myofibrils from depolymerization by ultraviolet light

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Wilson ◽  
Esther Fuller ◽  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Staining Pattern ◽  
Apparent Contradiction ◽  
Thin Filaments ◽  
Rhodamine Phalloidin ◽  
Fluorescence Image ◽  
Rabbit Psoas ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Presence And Absence ◽  
Over Time

We tested whether phalloidin protects actin in myofibrils from depolymerization by ultraviolet light (UV). I bands in glycerinated rabbit psoas myofibrils were irradiated with a UV microbeam in the presence and absence of phalloidin. We used the retention of contractility of the irradiated I band as the assay for protection of actin by phalloidin, since previous experiments indicated that UV blocks contraction of an irradiated I band by depolymerizing the thin filaments. The I bands of myofibrils incubated in phalloidin were as sensitive to UV as control I bands, indicating that phalloidin did not protect the thin filaments. However, phalloidin did protect F-actin in solution from depolymerization by UV. This apparent contradiction between F-actin in myofibrils and F-actin in solution was resolved by observing unirradiated myofibrils that were stained with rhodamine–phalloidin. It was found that phalloidin does not bind uniformly to the thin filaments, though as the fluorescence image is observed over time the staining pattern changes until it does appear to bind uniformly. We conclude that phalloidin does not protect F-actin in myofibrils from depolymerization by UV because it does not bind uniformly to the filaments.

Irradiations of rabbit myofibrils with an ultraviolet microbeam. I. Effects of ultraviolet light on the myofibril components necessary for contraction

1987 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Wilson ◽  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Thin Filament ◽  
Primary Effect ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Rabbit Psoas ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Filament Structure ◽  
Wavelength Light

Glycerinated rabbit psoas myofibrils, F-actin, and myofibril ghosts were irradiated with ultraviolet light (UV) to investigate how UV blocks myofibril contraction. Myofibril contraction is most sensitive to 270- and 290-nm wavelength light. We irradiated I and A bands separately with 270- and 290-nm wavelength light using a UV microbeam and constructed dose-response curves for blocking sarcomere contraction. For both wavelengths, irradiations of A bands required less energy per area to block contraction than did irradiations of I bands, suggesting that the primary effects of both 270- and 290-nm wavelength light in stopping myofibril contraction are on myosin. We investigated whether the primary effect of UV in blocking I-band contraction is the depolymerization of actin by comparing the relative sensitivities of I-band contraction, F-actin depolymerization, and thin filament depolymerization to 270- and 290-nm light. We also compared the dose of UV required to depolymerize F-actin in solution with the dose needed to block I-band contraction and the dose required to alter thin filament structure in myofibril ghosts. The results confirm that UV blocks I-band contraction by depolymerizing actin. We discuss how the results might be relevant to the hypothesis that an actomyosin-based system is involved in chromosome movement.

Phalloidin unzips nebulin from thin filaments in skeletal myofibrils

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3397-3403 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Ao ◽  
S.S. Lehrer
Keyword(s):  
Competitive Binding ◽  
Single Band ◽  
Thin Filaments ◽  
Rhodamine Phalloidin ◽  
Initial Binding

Fluorescent phallotoxins such as rhodamine-phalloidin take hours to bind uniformly to thin filaments of skeletal myofibrils, after fast initial binding to both ends of thin filaments. Observation of this process in skeletal and cardiac myofibrils and of the resulting re-distribution of nebulin using anti-nebulin antibody showed that: (1) rhodamine-phalloidin binds uniformly to actin in cardiac myofibrils within minutes, in contrast to skeletal myofibrils; (2) overnight pre-incubation of skeletal myofibrils with phalloidin results in uniform initial binding of rhodamine-phalloidin and a changed nebulin localization; (3) pre-incubation of skeletal myofibrils with Ca(2+)-calmodulin results in uniform initial binding of rhodamine-phalloidin; (4) the binding of rhodamine-phalloidin to actin in skeletal myofibrils is unidirectional, i.e. the fluorescence of incorporated rhodamine-phalloidin moves from the pointed ends where it is bound initially toward the barbed end at the Z-band; (5) the unidirectional binding of rhodamine-phalloidin results in redistribution of nebulin, i.e. the initial fluorescent bands associated with the epitopes of bound nebulin antibody change to a single band located close to Z-line. These results indicate that nebulin inhibits rhodamine-phalloidin binding to actin and suggests that the unidirectional rhodamine-phalloidin binding may be due to cooperative competitive binding, i.e. phalloidin ‘unzips’ nebulin starting from the pointed ends of the thin filaments.

Analysis of chromosome movement in crane fly spermatocytes by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of individual chromosomal spindle fibres. I. General results

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 770-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy J. Sillers ◽  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Ultraviolet Light ◽  
Monochromatic Light ◽  
The Other ◽  
Spindle Fibre ◽  
Chromosome Movement ◽  
Opposite Pole ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Spindle Fibres

Single chromosomal spindle fibres in anaphase Nephrotoma ferruginea (crane fly) spermatocytes were irradiated with monochromatic ultraviolet light focussed to a 4-μm spot by means of an ultraviolet microbeam apparatus. The movement of the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated spindle fibre was either unaffected or the half-bivalent stopped moving; i.e., the effect was all-or-none. When the half-bivalent associated with the irradiated spindle fibre did stop moving, the partner half-bivalent moving towards the opposite pole (i.e., the half-bivalent with which the first half-bivalent was previously paired) also stopped moving: all other half-bivalents moved normally. In over 90% of the 69 cases the movements of the two half-bivalents were only temporarily blocked; when movement resumed both half-bivalents resumed movement at the same time, after stoppage times ranging from 2 min to more than 15 min. In a few cases the half-bivalents never resumed poleward motion.When half-bivalents that had stopped movement finally resumed movement they often did not reach the poles; i.e., they "lagged" and remained separate from the other chromosomes. This result occurred only in spermatocytes of N. ferruginea. In spermatocytes of N. suturalis or N. abbreviata, on the other hand, the stopped half-bivalents did not lag but always reached the poles.Half-bivalent pairs that stopped moving in N. ferruginea spermatocytes did so for shorter times than did those previously reported (after irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres) in N. suturalis spermatocytes. We suggest that the difference is due to our use of monochromatic ultraviolet light as opposed to the previous use of heterochromatic ultraviolet light. We assume that different wavelengths of monochromatic light produce different effects, that any given monochromatic irradiation produces only one effect (albeit different effects at different wavelengths), but that heterochromatic irradiations can produce multiple effects.Irradiation of the interzone (between separating half-bivalents) had no effect on the chromosome-to-pole movements of the half-bivalents. Therefore the stoppage of movement of half-bivalent pairs is specific for irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres. On the other hand, irradiation of the interzone often blocked pole-to-pole elongation.

Does actin produce the force that moves a chromosome to the pole during anaphase?

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Forer
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Fibre ◽  
Apparent Contradiction ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
The Face ◽  
Spindle Fibres ◽  
Rule Out ◽  
Do So

Chromosomes move towards spindle poles because of force produced by chromosomal spindle fibres. I argue that actin is involved in producing this force. Actin is present in chromosomal spindle fibres, with consistent polarity. Physiological experiments using ultraviolet microbeam irradiations suggest that the force is due to an actin and myosin (or myosin-equivalent) system. Other physiological experiments (using inhibitors in "leaky" cells or antibodies injected into cells) that on the face of it would seem to rule out actin and myosin on closer scrutiny do not really do so at all. I argue that in vivo the "on" ends of chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules are at the kinetochores; I discuss the apparent contradiction between this conclusion and those from experiments on microtubules in vitro. From what we know of treadmilling in microtubules in vitro, the poleward movements of irradiation-induced areas of reduced birefringence (arb) can not be explained as treadmilling of microtubules: additional assumptions need to be made for arb movements toward the pole to be due to treadmilling. If arb movement does indeed represent treadmilling along chromosomal spindle fibre microtubules, treadmilling continues throughout anaphase. Thus I suggest that chromosomal spindle fibres shorten in anaphase not because polymerization is stopped at the kinetochore (the on end), as previously assumed, but rather because there is increased depolymerization at the pole (the "off" end).

Distribution and orientation of rhodamine-phalloidin bound to thin filaments in skeletal and cardiac myofibrils

1997 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Zhukarev ◽  
Jean M. Sanger ◽  
Joseph W. Sanger ◽  
Yale E. Goldman ◽  
Henry Shuman
Keyword(s):  
Thin Filaments ◽  
Rhodamine Phalloidin

scholarly journals Differences in the Charge Distribution of Glycerol-Extracted Muscle Fibers in Rigor, Relaxation, and Contraction

1974 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 551-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Pemrick ◽  
Charles Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Charge Distribution ◽  
Sarcomere Length ◽  
Muscle Fibers ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Nonlinear Relationship ◽  
Thin Filaments ◽  
Rabbit Psoas ◽  
Relaxation Solution ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Rest Length

Glycerol-extracted rabbit psoas muscle fibers were impaled with KCl-filled glass microelectrodes. For fibers at rest-length, the potentials were significantly more negative in solutions producing relaxation than in solutions producing either rigor or contraction; further the potentials in the latter two cases were not significantly different. For stretched fibers, with no overlap between thick and thin filaments, the potentials did not differ in the rigor, the relaxation, or the contraction solutions. The potentials measured from fibers in rigor did not vary significantly with the sarcomere length. For relaxed fibers, however, the potential magnitude decreased with increasing sarcomere length. The difference between the potentials measured for rigor and relaxed fibers exhibited a nonlinear relationship with sarcomere length. The potentials from calcium-insensitive fibers were less negative in both the rigor and the relaxation solutions than those from normal fibers. When calcium-insensitive fibers had been incubated in Hasselbach and Schneider's solution plus MgCl2 or Guba-Straub's solution plus MgATP the potentials recorded upon impalement were similar in the rigor and the relaxation solution to those obtained from normal fibers in the relaxed state. It is concluded that the increase in the negative potential as the glycerinated fiber goes from rigor to relaxation may be due to an alteration in the conformation of the contractile proteins in the relaxed state.

scholarly journals ANOMALOUS CONTRACTION OF INVERTEBRATE STRIATED MUSCLE

1965 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Stephens
Keyword(s):  
Mass Distribution ◽  
Striated Muscle ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Homarus Americanus ◽  
Limulus Polyphemus ◽  
Polarization Microscopy ◽  
Trypsin Treatment ◽  
Rabbit Psoas ◽  
Ultraviolet Microbeam ◽  
Intrinsic Birefringence

The phenomenon of A band shortening or contraction has been investigated in glycerinated myofibrils of Pecten irradians, Homarus americanus, Cambarus virilis, and Limulus polyphemus through the techniques of ultraviolet microbeam inactivation and polarization microscopy. With the former method, it has been shown that these muscles, even though exhibiting the shortening effect, contract in a manner consistent with only the sliding filament model. Intrinsic birefringence studies have indicated no significant changes in mass distribution or orientation within the shortened A bands. Except in the case of Limulus muscle, the shortening effect was seen only in contraction under tension. The magnitude of this anomalous phenomenon was dependent upon glycerination time and has been duplicated in rabbit psoas muscle through brief trypsin treatment. A band shortening could not be observed in glutaraldehyde-fixed muscle or in myofibrils glycerinated for only short periods. It has been concluded that the phenomenon of A band contraction is an artifact induced by the glycerination procedure, possibly through weakening of the sarcomere structure. However, the fact that the A band shortens under tension rather than lengthens poses an interesting paradox.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document