Inverse agonism: more than reverting constitutively active receptor signaling

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 676-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis J Dupré ◽  
Marek Rola-Pleszczynski ◽  
Jana Staňková

Seven-transmembrane receptors constitute one of the major families of proteins encoded by the genome. This type of receptor is one of the most important targets of the pharmaceutical industry, and many of the drugs with significant therapeutic action have been shown to be inverse agonists. Concepts regarding the mechanisms by which ligands activate and inactivate receptors are thought to be far more complex that a simple on–off switch. For both drug design and pharmacology principles, it is important to understand the mechanisms by which these drugs achieve their effects. Recent studies have demonstrated intriguing actions of inverse agonists. They have been shown not only to block constitutive responses of receptors but also to activate and regulate seven-transmembrane receptor signaling and trafficking. The activation of pathways by inverse agonists was shown to occur mainly via G-protein-independent mechanisms. These findings emphasize the importance of inverse agonism as a principle of receptor regulation. In this paper, we will review the evidence supporting inverse agonist promoted signaling and trafficking.Key words: G-protein-coupled receptor, seven-transmembrane receptor, inverse agonist, platelet-activating factor receptor, β2-adrenergic receptor.

2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (5) ◽  
pp. H1754-H1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Vaniotis ◽  
Bruce G. Allen ◽  
Terence E. Hébert

In recent years, we have come to appreciate the complexity of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in general and β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling in particular. Starting originally from three β-AR subtypes expressed in cardiomyocytes with relatively simple, linear signaling cascades, it is now clear that there are large receptor-based networks which provide a rich and diverse set of responses depending on their complement of signaling partners and the physiological state. More recently, it has become clear that subcellular localization of these signaling complexes also enriches the diversity of phenotypic outcomes. Here, we review our understanding of the signaling repertoire controlled by nuclear β-AR subtypes as well our understanding of the novel roles for G proteins themselves in the nucleus, with a special focus, where possible, on their effects in cardiomyocytes. Finally, we discuss the potential pathological implications of alterations in nuclear β-AR signaling.


Cell ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin J. Whalen ◽  
Matthew W. Foster ◽  
Akio Matsumoto ◽  
Kentaro Ozawa ◽  
Jonathan D. Violin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Cannavo ◽  
Federica Marzano ◽  
Andrea Elia ◽  
Daniela Liccardo ◽  
Leonardo Bencivenga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie C. Crans ◽  
Duaa Althumairy ◽  
Heide Murakami ◽  
B. George Barisas ◽  
Deborah Roess

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document