Use of monoclonal antibodies in a colony immunoblot analysis of viable Rhizobium cell numbers in legume inoculants and on preinoculated seed

1991 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry E. Olsen ◽  
Wendell A. Rice

A colony immunoblot assay using monoclonal antibodies was developed to permit rapid Rhizobium strain identification and quantification in alfalfa inoculants and preinoculated seed produced for the Canadian market. Plate-count colonies were pressed onto nitrocellulose membranes and then allowed to react with specific monoclonal antibodies. The monoclonal antibody reaction was then amplified by reaction with goat anti-mouse antibody and the goat antibody reaction further amplified and detected with rabbit anti-goat antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. A precipitating substrate for alkaline phosphatase was used to form purple spots on the membrane surface corresponding to positive reactions between the monoclonal antibody and the colony imprint. Results of analysis of 13 peat-base inoculants and 20 preinoculated seed samples by traditional most probable number and by immunoblot analysis indicated that the colony immunoblot test could be used as a reliable initial screen for viable Rhizobium cell numbers. Key words: Rhizobium, monoclonal antibody, immunoblot, Rhizobium inoculant analysis.

1983 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
G De Groote ◽  
P De Waele ◽  
A Van de Voorde ◽  
M De Broe ◽  
W Fiers

Abstract Convenient, sensitive, and specific solid-phase immunoassays involving monoclonal antibody are described for the determination of human placental alkaline phosphatase (hPLAP). An endogenous enzyme immunoassay combined the specificity of the immunological and the enzymatic reactions. Alternatively, a solid-phase "sandwich" radioimmunoassay involving immobilized polyclonal rabbit anti-hPLAP in combination with iodinated monoclonal antibody provided some additional advantages. Both tests can be used to detect hPLAP from various sources, e.g., in human sera during pregnancy or as a tumor marker. The radioimmunoassay detected an increase in hPLAP at nine weeks of gestation. We discuss the use of monoclonal antibodies for the differentiation of different alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme types by electrophoresis on starch gel.


2007 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Geneix ◽  
Eric Dufour ◽  
Annie Venien ◽  
Didier Levieux

The detection of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity is used as a legal test to determine whether milk has been adequately pasteurized or recontaminated with raw milk. However, a wide variety of microorganisms produce both heat labile and heat stable ALPs which cannot be differentiated from the milk ALP by current enzymatic methods. Monoclonal antibodies specific of the bovine milk ALP were obtained in mice from a raw bovine milk ALP preparation. Coated in microtitre plates, these antibodies specifically capture the bovine milk ALP from dairy products. After washing, the enzymatic activity of the captured ALP is revealed by adding p-nitrophenyl-phosphate as a substrate. This simple immunoassay does not react with ALPs of intestinal or bacterial origin and, once optimized, was found to be the first immunoassay suitable to detect raw milk in boiled milk down to a 0·02% dilution. Moreover, in contrast with competitive indirect ELISA formats, the capture immunoassay does not require purified ALP.


1985 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. D. Watkins ◽  
J. O'H. Tobin ◽  
P. J. Dennis ◽  
W. Brown ◽  
R. Newnham ◽  
...  

SUMMARYA panel of 10 monoclonal antibodies was used to subgroup 326 strains ofLegionella pneumophilaserogroup 1. All but two strains could be classified into three major subgroups named after their representative strains Pontiac 1, Olda and Bellingham 1. Of the 50 isolates from patients, 44 representing 32 separate incidents were of the Pontiac subgroup. This subgroup was also found in 16 of 18 buildings epidomiologically associated with Legionnaires' Disease. In contrast, strains of the Olda subgroup predominated in buildings where no infections had occurred. In 9 of the 11 incidents where isolates were available from at least one patient as well as from the suspected environmental source, the monoclonal antibody reaction patterns of strains from patients were identical to those of one or more of their environmental counterparts.


1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1087-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Rossi Norrlund ◽  
D. Holback ◽  
L. Johansson ◽  
S. -O. Hietala ◽  
K. Riklund Åhlstrom

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Noda ◽  
H. Ikuta ◽  
Y. Ebie ◽  
A. Hirata ◽  
S. Tsuneda ◽  
...  

Fluorescent antibody technique by the monoclonal antibody method is very useful and helpful for the rapid quantification and in situ detection of the specific bacteria like nitrifiers in a mixed baxterial habitat such as a biofilm. In this study, twelve monoclonal antibodies against Nitrosomonas europaea (IFO14298) and sixteen against Nitrobacter winogradskyi (IFO14297) were raised from splenocytes of mice (BALB/c). It was found that these antibodies exhibited little cross reactivity against various kinds of heterotrophic bacteria. The direct cell count method using monoclonal antibodies could exactly detect and rapidly quantify N. europaea and N. winogradskyi. Moreover, the distribution of N. europaea and N. winogradskyi in a biofilm could be examined by in situ fluorescent antibody technique. It was shown that most of N. winogradskyi existed near the surface part and most of N. europaea existed at the inner part of the polyethylene glycol (PEG) gel pellet, which had entrapped activated sludge and used in a landfill leachate treatment reactor. It was suggested that this monoclonal antibody method was utilized for estimating and controlling the population of nitrifying bacteria as a quick and favorable tool.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 1895-1907
Author(s):  
Navgeet Kaur ◽  
Anju Goyal ◽  
Rakesh K. Sindhu

The importance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology has increased drastically following the discovery of Milstein and Kohler. Since the first approval of the monoclonal antibody, i.e. Rituximab in 1997 by the FDA, there was a decline in further applications but this number has significantly increased over the last three decades for various therapeutic applications due to the lesser side effects in comparison to the traditional chemotherapy methods. Presently, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved and many are in queue for approval as a strong therapeutic agent for treating hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The main target checkpoints for the monoclonal antibodies against cancer cells include EGFR, VEGF, CD and tyrosine kinase which are overexpressed in malignant cells. Other immune checkpoints like CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-1 receptors targeted by the recently developed antibodies increase the capability of the immune system in destroying the cancerous cells. Here, in this review, the mechanism of action, uses and target points of the approved mAbs against cancer have been summarized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-133
Author(s):  
Ayesha Akhtar ◽  
Shivakumar Arumugam ◽  
Shoaib Alam

Background:: Protein A affinity chromatography is often employed as the most crucial purification step for monoclonal antibodies to achieve high yield with purity and throughput requirements. Introduction:: Protein A, also known as Staphylococcal protein A (SPA) is found in the cell wall of the bacteria staphylococcus aureus. It is one of the first discovered immunoglobulin binding molecules and has been extensively studied since the past few decades. The efficiency of Protein A affinity chromatography to purify a recombinant monoclonal antibody in a cell culture sample has been evaluated, which removes 99.0% of feed stream impurities. Materials and Method:: We have systematically evaluated the purification performance by using a battery of analytical methods SDS-PAGE (non-reduced and reduced sample), Cation Exchange Chromatography (CEX), Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and Reversed phased-Reduced Chromatography for a CHO-derived monoclonal antibody. Results and Discussion:: The analytical test was conducted to determine the impurity parameter, Host Cell Contaminating Proteins (HCP). It was evaluated to be 0.015ng/ml after the purification step; while initially, it was found to be 24.431ng/ml. Conclusion:: The tests showed a distinct decrease in the level of different impurities after the chromatography step. It can be concluded that Protein A chromatography is an efficient step in the purification of monoclonal antibodies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3166
Author(s):  
Jwala Priyadarsini Sivaccumar ◽  
Antonio Leonardi ◽  
Emanuela Iaccarino ◽  
Giusy Corvino ◽  
Luca Sanguigno ◽  
...  

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against cancer biomarkers are key reagents in diagnosis and therapy. One such relevant biomarker is a preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) that is selectively expressed in many tumors. Knowing mAb’s epitope is of utmost importance for understanding the potential activity and therapeutic prospective of the reagents. Methods: We generated a mAb against PRAME immunizing mice with PRAME fragment 161–415; the affinity of the antibody for the protein was evaluated by ELISA and SPR, and its ability to detect the protein in cells was probed by cytofluorimetry and Western blotting experiments. The antibody epitope was identified immobilizing the mAb on bio-layer interferometry (BLI) sensor chip, capturing protein fragments obtained following trypsin digestion and performing mass spectrometry analyses. Results: A mAb against PRAME with an affinity of 35 pM was obtained and characterized. Its epitope on PRAME was localized on residues 202–212, taking advantage of the low volumes and lack of fluidics underlying the BLI settings. Conclusions: The new anti-PRAME mAb recognizes the folded protein on the surface of cell membranes suggesting that the antibody’s epitope is well exposed. BLI sensor chips can be used to identify antibody epitopes.


1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard S. Rosenzweig ◽  
Girish N. Ranadive ◽  
Troy Seskey ◽  
Michael W. Epperly ◽  
William D. Bloomer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document