Effect of concrete specifications and inspection practices on freeze–thaw resistance: a field study
In the late sixties significant durability problems were encountered in a major metropolitan center in Canada. A review of prevailing construction practices was undertaken, together with a rigorous statistical analysis of the air content and compressive strength results. The main outcome of that study was a conclusion that a significant amount of the concrete placed on the job site had an unacceptably low air content. It is understood that these results, coupled with a review of specifications used in other metropolitan centers, provided the basis for revising the concrete materials specification in 1970. A similar review of strength and air content results was carried out at the end of that year. It was evident that an increase of approximately 1% had occurred in the average measured air content together with a small increase in compressive strength as the result of the specification changes. To assess the effect of this specification and further changes that have occurred since 1970, a third review was carried out in 1987. It was noted that during the intervening period a further increase in air content had taken place. Reasons for these changes are reviewed with respect to current construction practices. Also included is a review of the current specifications for this class of concrete in use in Canada. Key words: air content, compressive strength, specifications, inspection, statistics, durability.