Canada's urban infrastructure: rehabilitation needs and approaches
This paper reports on the results of a survey conducted for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities on the condition of urban infrastructure in Canadian cities and towns. The major emphasis was on roads, bridges, sewage collection and treatment, and water distribution and treatment systems. The Canadian findings are also compared with the reported U.S. situation. Although not as serious as in the U.S. cities, the survey shows that a significant decline has occurred in the condition of some infrastructure systems in Canadian urban areas. Costs to bring the most seriously deteriorated components of infrastructure (roads, bridges, sewer and water systems) back to acceptable levels are high. Even when spread over a 10-year recovery period, these costs will require an increase in current public works budgets of about 25%.Following the discussion of the state of urban infrastructure in Canada, the paper addresses approaches necessary to obtain optimum value for funds spent on rehabilitation of infrastructure. The need for rehabilitation must distinguish between structural and capacity inadequacies. Alternatives for rehabilitation must include both the engineering alternatives through repair, renovation, and replacement of systems and the management alternatives obtained through operational changes in the system and through changes in system demands. It is both desirable and possible to select engineering and (or) management alternatives on the basis of economic evaluations which trade off the cost of rehabilitation alternatives against the benefits from performance improvements, including the time staging or sequencing of alternatives. Key words: urban infrastructure, infrastructure deterioration, rehabilitation, alternatives, alternative evaluation.