Evaluation of fibre-reinforced polymer post-tensioned slab bridges using the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Noël ◽  
Khaled Soudki
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fibre Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Post Tensioned

New Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code design provisions for fibre-reinforced structures

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Mufti ◽  
B Bakht ◽  
N Banthia ◽  
B Benmokrane ◽  
G Desgagné ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prestressed Concrete ◽  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Code Design ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Deck Slabs ◽  
Fibre Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Precast Construction

This paper presents a synthesis of the design provisions of the second edition of the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) for fibre-reinforced structures. New design provisions for applications not covered by the first edition of the CHBDC and the rationale for those that remain unchanged from the first edition are given. Among the new design provisions are those for glass-fibre-reinforced polymer as both primary reinforcement and tendons in concrete; and for the rehabilitation of concrete and timber structures with externally bonded fibre-reinforced-polymer (FRP) systems or near-surface-mounted reinforcement. The provisions for fibre-reinforced concrete deck slabs in the first edition have been reorganized in the second edition to explicitly include deck slabs of both cast-in-place and precast construction and are now referred to as externally restrained deck slabs, whereas deck slabs containing internal FRP reinforcement are referred to as internally restrained deck slabs. Resistance factors in the second edition have been recast from those in the first edition and depend on the condition of use, with a further distinction made between factory- and field-produced FRP. In the second edition, the deformability requirements for FRP-reinforced and FRP-prestressed concrete beams and slabs of the first edition have been split into three subclauses covering the design for deformability, minimum flexural resistance, and crack-control reinforcement. The effect of sustained loads on the strength of FRPs is accounted for in the second edition by limits on stresses in FRP at the serviceability limit state.Key words: beams, bridges, concrete, decks, fibre-reinforced-polymer reinforcement, fibre-reinforced-polymer sheets, prestressing, repair, strengthening, wood.

Evaluation of the new Canadian highway bridge design code shear provisions for concrete beams with fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. El-Sayed ◽  
Brahim Benmokrane
Keyword(s):  
Concrete Beams ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Beams ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Shear Design ◽  
Reinforced Polymer

The Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC) contains provisions for designing concrete members with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement. In the second edition of the code, new shear design procedures for FRP-reinforced sections are provided. These procedures are consistent with those for steel-reinforced members in the code, in consideration of some modifications that account for the substantial differences between FRP and steel reinforcement. The shear approach adopted in the CHBDC follows the traditional approach of Vc + Vs for shear design. This paper presents an evaluation of this approach by comparing it with experimental shear strengths of available test data on beams longitudinally reinforced with FRP bars and with or without FRP stirrups. In addition, the CHBDC approach was compared with the FRP shear design provisions currently in effect in North America using the available test results. The comparison shows that the CHBDC method significantly underestimates the shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete beams. A proposed modification to this method is presented and verified against available test results.

Equivalent area of voided slabs

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 797-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie G Jaeger ◽  
Baidar Bakht ◽  
Gamil Tadros
Keyword(s):  
Simple Expression ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Axial Stiffness ◽  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Slab Thickness ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Equivalent Thickness ◽  
Simple Alternative ◽  
Equivalent Area

In order to calculate prestress losses in the transverse prestressing of voided concrete slabs, it is sometimes convenient to estimate the thickness of an equivalent solid slab. The Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, as well as the forthcoming Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, specifies a simple expression for calculating this equivalent thickness. This expression is reviewed in this technical note, and a simple alternative expression, believed to be more accurate, is proposed, along with its derivation. It is shown that the equivalent solid slab thickness obtained from consideration of in-plane forces is also applicable to transverse shear deformations, provided that the usual approximations of elementary strength of materials are used in both cases.Key words: axial stiffness, equivalent area, shear deformation, transverse prestressing, voided slab, slab.

Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario

1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Billing
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Load ◽  
Dynamic Testing ◽  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Vibration Modes ◽  
Design Codes ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Strain Measurements ◽  
Bridge Testing

The Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code (OHBDC) contains provisions on dynamic load and vibration that are substantially different from other codes. Dynamic testing of 27 bridges of various configurations, of steel, timber, and concrete construction, and with spans from 5 to 122 m was therefore undertaken to obtain comprehensive data to support OHBDC provisions. Standardized instrumentation, data acquisition, and test and data processing procedures were used for all bridge tests. Data was gathered from passing trucks, and scheduled runs by test vehicles of various weights. Accelerometer responses were used to determine bridge vibration modes, and dynamic amplifications were obtained from displacement or strain measurements. The form of the provisions adopted for dynamic load and vibration was confirmed by the test results, subject to minor adjustment of values. Observations on the distribution of dynamic load, and its relationship to span length and vehicle weight, may provide a basis for future refinement of the dynamic load provisions. If the stiffness of curbs and barrier walls is not included in deflection calculations, bridges designed by deflection could be penalized. Key words: bridges, vibration, bridge testing, bridge design codes.

Corrigendum: Reliability-based geotechnical design in 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1521-1521
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
Farzaneh Naghibi ◽  
David Dundas ◽  
Richard J. Bathurst ◽  
D.V. Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Geotechnical Design

scholarly journals Reliability-based geotechnical design in 2014 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
Farzaneh Naghibi ◽  
David Dundas ◽  
Richard J. Bathurst ◽  
D.V. Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Highway Bridge ◽  
Design Code ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Simple Fact ◽  
Codes Of Practice ◽  
Geotechnical Design ◽  
Civil Codes ◽  
Load And Resistance Factor

Canada has two national civil codes of practice that include geotechnical design provisions: the National Building Code of Canada and the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. For structural designs, both of these codes have been employing a load and resistance factor format embedded within a limit states design framework since the mid-1970s. Unfortunately, limit states design in geotechnical engineering has been lagging well behind that in structural engineering for the simple fact that the ground is by far the most variable (and hence uncertain) of engineering materials. Although the first implementation of a geotechnical limit states design code appeared in Denmark in 1956, it was not until 1979 that the concept began to appear in Canadian design codes, i.e., in the Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, which later became the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC). The geotechnical design provisions in the CHBDC have evolved significantly since their inception in 1979. This paper describes the latest advances appearing in the CHBDC along with the steps taken to calibrate its recent geotechnical resistance and consequence factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document