Reliability and Validity of a Portable Metabolic Measurement System
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a portable metabolic system (TEEM 100) during submaximal and maximal [Formula: see text] exercise using a computer-based metabolic system as the reference system (REF). Between repeated trials of submaximal exercise at three constant loads, differences in ventilation [Formula: see text] and oxygen consumption [Formula: see text] were 0.2 ± 4.9 L∙min−1 and 0.03 ± 0.10 L∙min−1 for REF, and 1.9 ± 0.7 L∙min−1 and 0.00 ± 0.17 L∙min−1 for TEEM 100. Pooled intraclass reliability coefficients for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] calculated from the repeated submaximal trials were r =.89 and r =.94 for REF, and r =.86 and r =.94 for the TEEM 100. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) measured by the TEEM 100 was significantly higher (p =.01) at only the lowest workload. At [Formula: see text], the TEEM 100 recorded significantly higher values for FeO2 (p =.01) and RER (p <.001). These results suggest that the TEEM 100 provides reliable and valid measurements of [Formula: see text] during submaximal and maximal exercise. Key words: oxygen consumption, indirect calorimetry, portable analysis, exercise, metabolism