scholarly journals Sex differences in insulin action and body fat distribution in overweight and obese middle-aged and older men and women

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia M. Ferrara ◽  
Andrew P. Goldberg ◽  
Barbara J. Nicklas ◽  
John D. Sorkin ◽  
Alice S. Ryan

Controversy exists as to whether there are differences in insulin action between older men and women, and what factors contribute to these differences. This study tests the hypothesis that sex differences in regional fat distribution contribute to a disparity in insulin sensitivity in older men vs. older women. Healthy, older (50–71 years), sedentary men (n = 28) and women (n = 29) were recruited to participate in the study. Body fat, fat-free mass (FFM), and visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous abdominal (SAT) adipose tissue areas were measured by DXA and computed tomography (CT). For measurements of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (M), insulin was infused at a constant rate of 240 pmol·m–2·min–1, and M was calculated between the 90th and 120th min of the hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp. The men weighed 16% more and had 16% higher waist and 4% lower hip circumferences than women (p < 0.05 for all). Total fat mass and SAT were 21% and 33% lower and FFM was 49% higher in men than in women, whereas waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and VAT:SAT ratio were 21% and 56% higher in men than in women (p < 0.05 for all). Although insulin concentrations during the glucose clamp were higher in men, M was 47% lower in men vs. women (21.7 ± 1.1 vs. 46.7 ± 3.1 µmol·L–1·kgFFM–1·min–1, p < 0.05). The sex-related differences in M persisted after controlling for insulin concentrations during the glucose clamp, for waist, WHR, and VAT:SAT. Older men are more insulin resistant than women, despite lower body fat and subcutaneous abdominal fat. This difference in insulin sensitivity is not explained by abdominal fat distribution, therefore other metabolic factors contribute to the sex differences in insulin sensitivity.

1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. M293-M298 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Visser ◽  
L. J. Launer ◽  
P. Deurenberg ◽  
D. J. H. Deeg

1997 ◽  
Vol 145 (8) ◽  
pp. 752-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Visser ◽  
L. J. Launer ◽  
P. Deurenberg ◽  
D. J. H. Deeg

2005 ◽  
Vol 165 (7) ◽  
pp. 777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bret H. Goodpaster ◽  
Shanthi Krishnaswami ◽  
Tamara B. Harris ◽  
Andreas Katsiaras ◽  
Steven B. Kritchevsky ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (2) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Hays ◽  
Raymond D. Starling ◽  
Xiaolan Liu ◽  
Dennis H. Sullivan ◽  
Todd A. Trappe ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Ouyang ◽  
Jidong Sung ◽  
Mark D. Kelemen ◽  
Paul S. Hees ◽  
James R. Deregis ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 307-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usha Chowdhary

507 older men and women (65 yr. or over) participated in an investigation of relationship between clothing-related behavior of older men and women and self-perceived somatorypes. Analysis indicated that body-type was significantly related to significance of apparel, self-esteem, and chronological age. No sex differences were found in perception of body-types. Several implications are discussed and suggestions for further research are made.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristoffer Jensen Kolnes ◽  
Maria Houborg Petersen ◽  
Teodor Lien-Iversen ◽  
Kurt Højlund ◽  
Jørgen Jensen

In obesity, excessive abdominal fat, especially the accumulation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), increases the risk of metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Excessive abdominal fat is associated with adipose tissue dysfunction, leading to systemic low-grade inflammation, fat overflow, ectopic lipid deposition, and reduced insulin sensitivity. Physical activity is recommended for primary prevention and treatment of obesity, T2DM, and related disorders. Achieving a stable reduction in body weight with exercise training alone has not shown promising effects on a population level. Because fat has a high energy content, a large amount of exercise training is required to achieve weight loss. However, even when there is no weight loss, exercise training is an effective method of improving body composition (increased muscle mass and reduced fat) as well as increasing insulin sensitivity and cardiorespiratory fitness. Compared with traditional low-to-moderate-intensity continuous endurance training, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and sprint interval training (SIT) are more time-efficient as exercise regimens and produce comparable results in reducing total fat mass, as well as improving cardiorespiratory fitness and insulin sensitivity. During high-intensity exercise, carbohydrates are the main source of energy, whereas, with low-intensity exercise, fat becomes the predominant energy source. These observations imply that HIIT and SIT can reduce fat mass during bouts of exercise despite being associated with lower levels of fat oxidation. In this review, we explore the effects of different types of exercise training on energy expenditure and substrate oxidation during physical activity, and discuss the potential effects of exercise training on adipose tissue function and body fat distribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document