Genetic factors controlling white gene expression of the transposon AR4-24 at a telomere in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Balasov
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Restricted Pattern

The position effect of the AR 4-24 P[white, rosy] transposon was studied at cytological position 60F. Three copies of the transposon (within ~50-kb region) resulted in a spatially restricted pattern of white variegation. This pattern was modified by temperature and by removal of the Y chromosome, suggesting that it was due to classical heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation (PEV). In contrast with classical PEV, extra dose of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) suppressed white variegation and one dose enhanced it. The effect of Pc-G, trx-G, and other PEV suppressors was also tested. It was found that E(Pc)1, TrlR85, and mutations of Su(z)2C relieve AR 4-24- silencing and z1 enhances it. To explain the results obtained with these modifiers, it is proposed that PEV and telomeric position effect can counteract each other at this particular cytological site.Key words: position effect variegation, heterochromatin protein 1, Drosophila melanogaster.

Evidence for intrinsic differences in the formation of chromatin domains in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Bishop
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
The Other ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Compaction Process ◽  
Chromatin Domains ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Reporter Systems

Abstract The results of an investigation into intrinsic differences in the formation of two different heterochromatic domains are presented. The study utilized two different position effect variegation mutants in Drosophila melanogaster for investigating the process of compacting different stretches of DNA into heterochromatin. Each stretch of DNA encodes for a gene that affects different aspects of bristle morphology. The expression of each gene is prevented when it is compacted into heterochromatin thus the genes serve as effective reporter systems to monitor the spread of heterochromatin. Both variegating mutants are scored in the same cell such that environmental and genetic background differences are unambiguously eliminated. Any differences observed in the repression of the two genes must therefore be the result of intrinsic differences in the heterochromatic compaction process for the two stretches of DNA. Studies of the effects different enhancers of variegation have upon the compaction of the two genes indicate each compaction event occurs independently of the other, and that different components are involved in the two processes. These results are discussed with regard to spreading heterochromatin and the role this process may play in regulating gene expression.

scholarly journals Weakener of white (Wow), a gene that modifies the expression of the white eye color locus and that suppresses position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 1057-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Birchler ◽  
U Bhadra ◽  
L Rabinow ◽  
R Linsk ◽  
A T Nguyen-Huynh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Northern Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Eye Color ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Modifying Effect ◽  
Color Gene

Abstract A locus is described in Drosophila melanogaster that modifies the expression of the white eye color gene. This trans-acting modifier reduces the expression of the white gene in the eye, but elevates the expression in other adult tissues. Because of the eye phenotype in which the expression of white is lessened but not eliminated, the newly described locus is called the Weakener of white (Wow). Northern analysis reveals that Wow can exert an inverse or direct modifying effect depending upon the developmental stage. Two related genes, brown and scarlet, that are coordinately expressed with white, are also affected by Wow. In addition, Wow modulates the steady state RNA level of the retrotransposon, copia. When tested with a white promoter-Alcohol dehydrogenase reporter. Wow confers the modifying effect to the reporter, suggesting a requirement of the white regulatory sequences for mediating the response. In addition to being a dosage sensitive regulator of white, brown, scarlet and copia, Wow acts as a suppressor of position effect variegation. There are many dosage sensitive suppressors of position effect variegation and many dosage-sensitive modifiers of gene expression. The Wow mutations provide evidence for an overlap between the two types of modifiers.

scholarly journals A correlation between development time and variegated position effect in Drosophila melanogaster

1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Michailidis ◽  
Neil D. Murray ◽  
Jennifer A. Marshall Graves
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Development Time ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Chromosome Rearrangement ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Regression Relationship ◽  
Environmental Agents ◽  
Differential Gene

SummaryPosition-effect variegation is a phenomenon in which cell-autonomous genes, normally expressed in all cells of a tissue, are expressed in some cells but not in others, leading to a mosaic tissue. Variegation occurs when a normally euchromatic gene is re-positioned close to heterochromatin by chromosome rearrangement. The extent of variegation is known to be influenced by a number of environmental and genetic factors. In the courss of investigations of the influence of the pH of larval medium on the extent of eye-colour variegation in In(1)ωm4 Drosophila melanogaster, we have found that the extent of variegation depends on development time. Flies reared at pH 2·6 develop slowly and show more extreme variegation than those reared at higher pH. This effect, as well as variations within the pH treatments, can be accounted for by differences in development time. The observed regression relationship between variegation and development time also appears to accommodate the influences of temperature on both variables. We suggest that development time may account causally for the reported influences of a number of environmental agents (temperature, crowding, chemicals) on variegation. Ways in which this might occur are discussed in the context of models of the molecular basis of differential gene activity.

scholarly journals Position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster: relationship between suppression effect and the amount of Y chromosome.

Genetics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Dimitri ◽  
C Pisano
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Chromosome Rearrangements ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Suppression Effect ◽  
Genetic Nature ◽  
Cell Clones ◽  
Effect Variegation

Abstract Position effect variegation results from chromosome rearrangements which translocate euchromatic genes close to the heterochromatin. The euchromatin-heterochromatin association is responsible for the inactivation of these genes in some cell clones. In Drosophila melanogaster the Y chromosome, which is entirely heterochromatic, is known to suppress variegation of euchromatic genes. In the present work we have investigated the genetic nature of the variegation suppressing property of the D. melanogaster Y chromosome. We have determined the extent to which different cytologically characterized Y chromosome deficiencies and Y fragments suppress three V-type position effects: the Y-suppressed lethality, the white mottled and the brown dominant variegated phenotypes. We find that: (1) chromosomes which are cytologically different and yet retain similar amounts of heterochromatin are equally effective suppressors, and (2) suppression effect is positively related to the size of the Y chromosome deficiencies and fragments that we tested. It increases with increasing amounts of Y heterochromatin up to 60-80% of the entire Y, after which the effect reaches a plateau. These findings suggest suppression is a function of the amount of Y heterochromatin present in the genome and is not attributable to any discrete Y region.

scholarly journals CYTOGENETIC LOCALIZATION OF THE ACID PHOSPHATASE-1 GENE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Genetics ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-497
Author(s):  
William J Morrison ◽  
Ross J MacIntyre
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Acid Phosphatase ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Chromosome 3 ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Effect Variegation

ABSTRACT A translocation in which a segment of chromosome 3 is inserted into the Y chromosome was found to contain the acid phosphatase-1 gene (Acph-1). In flies hyperploid for that gene, acid phosphatase-1 levels are proportional to the dose of the gene. The locus is placed within the salivary chromosome subdivisions 99D and 99E on the basis of its inclusion in the translocated segment and on the previous placement of the claret locus. Several chromosomal rearrangements involving heterochromatic breakpoints and euchromatic breakpoints adjacent to 99D-99E were tested for possible position-effect variegation of acid phosphatase-1. No decrease in the synthesis of the electrophoretic subunit encoded by the relocated gene was observed within any of the rearrangements.

scholarly journals MATERNAL-ZYGOTIC LETHAL INTERACTIONS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: THE EFFECTS OF DEFICIENCIES IN THE ZESTE-WHITE REGION OF THE X CHROMOSOME

Genetics ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard G Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Gene Activity ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
White Region ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Zygotic Gene ◽  
Maternal Gene

ABSTRACT The possibility that essential loci in the zeste-white region of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome are expressed both maternally and zygotically has been tested. Maternal gene activity was varied by altering gene dose, and zygotic gene activity was manipulated by use of position-effect variegation of a duplication. Viability is affected when both maternal and zygotic gene activity are reduced, but not when either maternal or zygotic gene activity is normal. Tests of a set of overlapping deficiencies demonstrate that at least three sections of the zeste-white region yield maternal zygotic lethal interactions. Single-cistron mutations at two loci in one of these segments have been tested, and maternal heterozygosity for mutations at both loci give lethal responses of mutant-duplication zygotes. Thus, at least four of the 13 essential functions coded in the zeste-white region are active both maternally and zygotically, suggesting that a substantial fraction of the genome may function at both stages. The normal survival of zygotes when either maternal gene expression or zygotic gene expression is normal, and their inviability when both are depressed, suggests that a developmental stage exists when maternally determined functions and zygotically coded functions are both in use.

Varied expression of a Y-linked P[w+] insert due to imprinting in Drosophila melanogaster

Genome ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany S Haller ◽  
R C Woodruff
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
P Element ◽  
Parental Origin ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein 1 ◽  
Parental Female

During gametogenesis, a gene can become imprinted affecting its expression in progeny. We have used the expression of a Y-linked P[w+]YAL transposable DNA element as a reporter system to investigate the effect of parental origination on the expression of the w+ insert. Expression of w+ was greater in male progeny when the Y chromosome, harboring the insert, was inherited from the parental male rather than from the parental female. Imprinting was not due to a genetic background influence in the males, since the only difference among the males was the parental origin of the Y chromosome. It was also observed that the genetic background can affect imprinting, since w+ expression was also higher in males when the Y was derived from C(1)DX attached-X parental females rather than from C(1)RM attached-X parental females. Though the heterochromatic imprinting mechanism is unknown, a mutated Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) gene, which is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation, increases expression of the w+ locus in the P[w+]YAL insert, indicating that HP1 may play a role in Y chromosome packaging. Key words: Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin, HP1, imprinting, P-element, Y chromosome.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of a Histone Deacetylase in Drosophila melanogaster: Missense Mutations Suppress Gene Silencing Associated With Position Effect Variegation

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Mottus ◽  
Richard E Sobel ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract For many years it has been noted that there is a correlation between acetylation of histones and an increase in transcriptional activity. One prediction, based on this correlation, is that hypomorphic or null mutations in histone deacetylase genes should lead to increased levels of histone acetylation and result in increased levels of transcription. It was therefore surprising when it was reported, in both yeast and fruit flies, that mutations that reduced or eliminated a histone deacetylase resulted in transcriptional silencing of genes subject to telomeric and heterochromatic position effect variegation (PEV). Here we report the first mutational analysis of a histone deacetylase in a multicellular eukaryote by examining six new mutations in HDAC1 of Drosophila melanogaster. We observed a suite of phenotypes accompanying the mutations consistent with the notion that HDAC1 acts as a global transcriptional regulator. However, in contrast to recent findings, here we report that specific missense mutations in the structural gene of HDAC1 suppress the silencing of genes subject to PEV. We propose that the missense mutations reported here are acting as antimorphic mutations that “poison” the deacetylase complex and propose a model that accounts for the various phenotypes associated with lesions in the deacetylase locus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document