Ancient and recent duplications of the rainbow trout Wilms' tumor gene

Genome ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P Brunelli ◽  
Barrie D Robison ◽  
Gary H Thorgaard

The Wilms' tumor suppressor (WT1) gene plays an important role in the development and functioning of the genitourinary system, and mutations in this gene are associated with nephroblastoma formation in humans. Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is one of the rare animal models that readily form nephroblastomas, yet trout express three distinct WT1 genes, one of which is duplicated and inherited tetrasomically. Sequence analyses suggest an ancient gene duplication in the common ancestor of bony fishes resulted in the formation of two WT1 gene families, that conserve the splicing variations of tetrapod WT1, and a second duplication event occurred in the trout lineage. The WT1 genes of one family map to linkage groups 6 and 27 in the trout genome map. Reverse transcribed polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) expression analysis demonstrated little difference in WT1 tissue expression pattern between genes.Key words: tumor suppressor, nephroblastoma, RT-PCR expression, kidney, cancer, cDNA, gene mapping.

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (8) ◽  
pp. 2969-2976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushi Inoue ◽  
Hiroya Tamaki ◽  
Hiroyasu Ogawa ◽  
Yoshihiro Oka ◽  
Toshihiro Soma ◽  
...  

The WT1 gene is a tumor-suppressor gene that was isolated as a gene responsible for Wilms' tumor, a childhood kidney neoplasm. We have previously reported that the WT1 gene is strongly expressed in leukemia cells with an increase in its expression levels at relapse and an inverse correlation between its expression levels and prognosis, thus making it a novel tumor marker for leukemic blast cells. Furthermore, WT1 antisense oligomers have been found to inhibit the growth of leukemic cells. These results strongly suggested the involvement of the WT1 gene in human leukemogenesis. The present study was performed to prove our hypothesis that the WT1 gene plays a key role in leukemogenesis and performs an oncogenic function in hematopoietic progenitor cells, rather than a tumor-suppressor gene function. 32D cl3, an interleukin-3–dependent myeloid progenitor cell line, differentiates into mature neutrophils in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, when transfected wild-type WT1 gene was constitutively expressed in 32D cl3, the cells stopped differentiating and continued to proliferate in response to G-CSF. As for signal transduction mediated by G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR), Stat3α was constitutively activated in wild-type WT1-infected 32D cl3 in response to G-CSF, whereas, in WT1-uninfected 32D cl3, activation of Stat3α was only transient. However, most interesting was the fact that G-CSF stimulation resulted in constitutive activation of Stat3β only in wild-type WT1-infected 32D cl3, but not in WT1-uninfected 32D cl3. Thus, WT1 expression constitutively activated both Stat3α and Stat3β. A transient activation of Stat1 was detected in both wild-type WT1-infected and uninfected 32D cl3 after G-CSF stimulation, but no difference in its activation was found. No activation of MAP kinase was detected in both wild-type WT1-infected and uninfected 32D cl3 after G-CSF stimulation. These results demonstrated that WT1 expression competed with the differentiation-inducing signal mediated by G-CSFR and constitutively activated Stat3, resulting in the blocking of differentiation and subsequent proliferation. Therefore, the data presented here support our hypothesis that the WT1 gene plays an essential role in leukemogenesis and performs an oncogenic function in hematopoietic progenitor cells and represent the first demonstration of an important role of the WT1 gene in signal transduction in hematopoietic progenitor cells.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Hassan Awada ◽  
Arda Durmaz ◽  
Carmelo Gurnari ◽  
Misam Zawit ◽  
Sunisa Kongkiatkamon ◽  
...  

Mutations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes are both potentially therapeutically actionable in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Wilms' Tumor 1 (WT1) gene is located on 11p13 and encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which has been found to be overexpressed and mutated in AML. In normal development, WT1 is only expressed in a small subset of hematopoietic stem cells. While its overexpression suggests an oncogenic role, the invariable presence of mutations in the cysteine-histidine zinc finger domains indicates a tumor suppressor function, similar to that in WAGR syndrome/11p deletion syndrome in which it was first discovered. Like its unknown function in AML, the clinical significance and genetic associations of WT1 mutations have been also controversial. Although studies of WT1 mutations in AML have been conducted, the lack of solid clinical and molecular characterization of large WT1-mutant (WT1MT) AML cohort has hampered its definition. In this study, we took advantage of a compendia of genomic results from Cleveland Clinic and publicly available data of 2188 AML patients (primary (p)AML, n= 1636; secondary (s)AML, n= 433; therapy-related (t)AML, n= 119, excluding cases with acute promyelocytic leukemia, MLL-rearrangement, and core-binding factor AML). While several reports only focused on cytogenetic normal AML (CN-AML), which represented 61% of our cohort, we additionally included all other cytogenetic risk groups. In total, WT1 mutations were detected in 5% (114/2188) of patients. WT1 mutations were enriched in pAML (85%) compared to sAML (11%) and tAML (4%). Thirty-nine patients (13%) carried more than 1 WT1 mutation. WT1MT were younger [59 vs 64 years, P=0.0002] and more often females (55% vs 45%, P=0.03) as compared to WT1 wild type (WT1WT) patients. Univariate analyses of baseline parameters showed that WT1MT AML had a more proliferative phenotype with a higher WBC [15.1 vs 9.5 x109/L, P=0.03] and bone marrow blast percentages [73 vs 59%, P=0.002] and with lower platelet counts [44 vs 56 x109/L, P=0.008] compared to WT1WT cases. In the WT1MT cohort, 70% had a normal karyotype, with complex karyotype being significantly less frequent vsWT1WT patients [4 vs 16%, P=0.001]. The most common cytogenetic abnormalities in WT1MT patients included +8 (8%) followed by -9/del(9q) (3%) and -7/del(7q) (3%). Only 1 patient carried inv(3)/t(3;3) or -17/del(17p). In sum, no statistical differences in cytogenetics were found between WT1MTvsWT1WT AML patients. Next, identified mutational signatures of WT1MT patients. A panel of 44 myeloid genes and their hotspot configurations were selected according to their relevance in AML. In comparison to WT1WT AML patients, multivariate analyses showed that WT1MT patients had higher odds of biallelic CEBPA (12 vs 3%; P=0.009) and FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations (FLT3ITD, 31 vs 16%; P=0.01) but lower odds of SRSF2 mutations (2 vs 9%, P=0.04). Since FLT3ITD has been previously described to be associated with WT1 mutations, we also focused on investigating whether mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) were frequent in WT1MT as well. Although we found increased percentages of FLT3TKD (11%) among the WT1MT patients compared to WT1WT cohort (8%), this difference did not reach statistical significance. To uncover multifactor lesions (cytogenetic and/ or additional molecular lesions) of prognostic importance, we performed survival analyses. Although the combination of WT1 mutations and FLT3TKD shortened overall survival (OS) by 2-times in WT1MT patients vsWT1WT cases with FLT3TKD (23.7 vs 45.9 months), this result was not significant (P=0.1). In addition, the concurrent presence of other cytogenetic and molecular features didn't reveal significant impact on OS. In sum, using an adequately powered cohort, our study of the genomic landscape of WT1MT AML patients identified its genomic associations and their clinical and prognostic inferences. The application of advanced machine learning methods to large datasets of WT1MT AML patients might be crucial to capture the complex genomic interactions of WT1 gene in AML. Disclosures Carraway: BMS: Consultancy, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); ASTEX: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Abbvie: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Nazha:MEI: Other: Data monitoring Committee; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Research Funding. Sekeres:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy. Maciejewski:Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.


1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
B R Dey ◽  
V P Sukhatme ◽  
A B Roberts ◽  
M B Sporn ◽  
F J Rauscher ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1329-1329
Author(s):  
Carolina Martínez-Laperche ◽  
Mi Kwon ◽  
Ana Carolina Franco-Villegas ◽  
Carmen Chillón ◽  
Nerea Castro ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene, located on chromosome 11p13, encodes a transcription factor with both oncogene and tumor suppressor functions. WT1 is reportedly overexpressed in 90% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and thus can be used for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by quantitative RT-PCR. The aim of the present study was to analyze the usefulness of WT1 as a marker for MRD in AML after chemotherapy and as a predictor of relapse and survival. Patients and Methods This retrospective and multicentric study included 114 patients with WT1-overexpressed AML (Table 1). Quantitative assessment of WT1 transcript levels was performed by quantitative RT-PCR in 283 bone marrow (BM) samples at diagnosis, post-induction and post-consolidation. WT1 gene expression was calculated by relative quantification using the normalized ratio of the target gene (WT1) related to a reference gene (GUS) and using cell line K562 as calibrator. Inter-laboratories methodological standardization was accomplished through a pilot study with 10 BM donor samples, 20 BM patient samples and commercial WT1 plasmids (ProfileQuant Kit, Ipsogen-Qiagen). Results No significant differences in WT1 gene expression (cycle threshold, Ct) were observed between different laboratories in the pilot study. The cut-off value of WT1 over-expression in BM was established in 0.55% (median+2SD values from healthy donors). Median WT1 expression in patient samples at diagnosis was 29.5% (range, 2-1220). Differential expression at diagnosis was not correlated with age, sex, leukocytes, karyotype (risk), however a higher expression in patients with AML-M1 and AML-M2 subtypes as well as patients with mutant NPM1 and/or ITD-FLT3 was observed. Most patients (88.6%; 101/114) received intensive chemotherapy as induction treatment. After induction, 80.2% (81/101) of patients had available WT1 data, of which 23.45% (19/81) were positive. In addition, 79.8% (91/114) received intensive treatment during consolidation. WT1 results were available for 75.5% (66/91), of which 22.7% (15/66) were positive. Post-induction WT1 positivity was correlated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 2 years 76% vs. 28.2% p=0.002) and a lower overall survival (OS; 2 years, 44.9% vs. 78.2% p=0.022; Figure 1a,b). Similar results were obtained when patients intensified with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) were excluded from the analysis: higher CIR (2 years 88.9% vs. 32.5%; p=0.005) and lower OS (40% vs. 76.2% p=0.17). Post-consolidation WT1 positivity was correlated with a trend to a higher CIR (2 years 60.3% vs. 41.4% p=0.21) and a lower OS (2 years 44.9% vs. 66% p=0.09; Figure 1c,d). Statistically significant results were obtained after consolidation when patients treated with allo-SCT were excluded from the analysis: higher CIR (2 years 100% vs. 40.1% p=0.005) and lower OS (2 years 20% vs. 66% p=0.003). Conclusions WT1 is a useful marker for MRD in AML patients undergoing chemotherapy (induction and consolidation) which allows anticipation of relapse and survival. Post-induction results were a strong risk factor of relapse and survival in all patients, including those intensified with allo-SCT. By contrast post-consolidation results are especially relevant in the group of patients not treated with allo-SCT. Intensification with allo-SCT overcomes the poor prognosis derived from positive post-consolidation WT1 results. Paper presented on behalf of the Hematological Molecular Biology Group (GBMH) of the Spanish Society of Hematology (SEHH). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 963-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hidaka ◽  
M Suzuki

Four types of calcitonin are produced in salmonid fish, although their functional diversity is almost unknown. To explore the significance of these isoforms, we have characterized salmon-type calcitonin (sCT) mRNAs in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and examined their tissue distribution. In addition to the previously isolated sCT-I cDNAs, two new forms of sCT cDNA were cloned from the ultimobranchial gland, and one of them (sCT-IV cDNA) was predicted to encode an N-terminal peptide of 80 amino acid residues, a putative cleavage site Lys-Arg, sCT-IV, a cleavage and amidation sequence Gly-Lys-Lys-Arg, and a C-terminal peptide of 18 amino acids. The sCT-IV precursor was 78% identical with the rainbow trout sCT-I precursors. The other cloned cDNA encoded a precursor for a novel CT, sCT-V. The sCT-V peptide was different from sCT-IV by only one amino acid residue: Val at position 8 in the latter was replaced by Met. The sCT-V precursor had 80 and 90% identity with the sCT-I and -IV precursors respectively. No cDNA clones were obtained for sCTs-II or -III.Tissue distribution of sCT-I, -IV and -V mRNAs was examined by RT-PCR and specific cleavage with restriction enzymes. An amplified fragment from sCT-I mRNA was detected not only in the ultimobranchial gland, but also in the gills, testis and ovary. RT-PCR analysis coupled to restriction digestion further revealed that sCT-IV mRNA was expressed in both the testis and the ultimobranchial gland. The expression sites of sCT-IV mRNA were localized to the Leydig cells of the testis and to the parenchymal cells of the ultimobranchial gland, by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Although the amino acid sequence of sCT-V peptide was nearly the same as that of sCT-IV, the sCT-V gene showed a much wider pattern of expression: the band amplified by RT-PCR was detected in all the tissues examined except the kidney, gills and blood cells. The sCT-V mRNA was shown to be localized in the parenchymal cells of the ultimobranchial gland, but not in other tissues at the cellular level, suggesting very low expression of sCT-V mRNA in those tissues. Our results show different patterns of tissue expression of three types of sCT genes in the rainbow trout, suggesting that sCTs-I, -IV and -V might differ in their local actions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document