Size-dependent predation in piscivores: interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities

1999 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 1285-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lundvall ◽  
Richard Svanbäck ◽  
Lennart Persson ◽  
Pär Byström

Body size is known to play a crucial role in predator-prey interactions. For a given predator size, it has been suggested that prey mortality should be a dome-shaped function dependent on prey body size. In this study, we experimentally tested (i) the suggested mechanisms responsible for the dome-shaped prey vulnerability function and (ii) whether a prey refuge affected the form of this function. As prey, we used young-of-the-year Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis), and as predator, larger Eurasian perch. The prey mortality as a function of prey size was dome shaped for large and medium predators but decreased monotonically with prey size for small predators. Capture success of predators decreased monotonically with increasing prey size and was lower for small predators. In refuge trials, the mortality of prey declined monotonically with prey size for all predator sizes. Refuge use of prey increased with the sizes of both prey and predator. Our results suggest that the hypothesized dome-shaped relationship on prey vulnerability can be altered by the presence of an absolute prey refuge. Our results further suggest that the ability to perform more flexible foraging behaviors is of increasing importance when prey size increases.

2012 ◽  
Vol 115-116 ◽  
pp. 24-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anssi Vainikka ◽  
Jani Koskimäki ◽  
Petri T. Niemelä ◽  
Raine Kortet

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 20121193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takefumi Nakazawa ◽  
Shin-ya Ohba ◽  
Masayuki Ushio

As predator–prey interactions are inherently size-dependent, predator and prey body sizes are key to understanding their feeding relationships. To describe predator–prey size relationships (PPSRs) when predators can consume prey larger than themselves, we conducted field observations targeting three aquatic hemipteran bugs, and assessed their body masses and those of their prey for each hunting event. The data revealed that their PPSR varied with predator size and species identity, although the use of the averaged sizes masked these effects. Specifically, two predators had slightly decreased predator–prey mass ratios (PPMRs) during growth, whereas the other predator specialized on particular sizes of prey, thereby showing a clear positive size–PPMR relationship. We discussed how these patterns could be different from fish predators swallowing smaller prey whole.


Aquaculture ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 313 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Żarski ◽  
Katarzyna Palińska ◽  
Katarzyna Targońska ◽  
Zoltán Bokor ◽  
László Kotrik ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 967-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Żarski ◽  
Á. Horváth ◽  
L. Kotrik ◽  
K. Targońska ◽  
K. Palińska ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 846-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Ben Khadher ◽  
Jean-François Agnèse ◽  
Sylvain Milla ◽  
Fabrice Teletchea ◽  
Pascal Fontaine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document