Seasonal changes in habitat use and preference by juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a northern boreal river

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Maki-Petäys ◽  
T Muotka ◽  
A Huusko ◽  
P Tikkanen ◽  
P Kreivi

By means of electrofishing, we examined seasonal and size-class variation in habitat preference by juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a third-order river in northern Finland. Larger trout preferred deeper stream areas than young-of-the-year fish. At the onset of winter, all trout size-classes moved into shallower water, but this mainly reflected seasonal variation in habitat availability. In winter, trout preferred slowly flowing stream areas, whereas in other seasons the mean water velocities used by trout parallelled habitat availability. In summer and autumn, age-0 fish favoured stream areas with large amounts of aquatic vegetation to provide cover. The largest trout (16-22 cm) occupied habitats with little cover throughout the year, and in winter, all trout avoided areas with high instream cover. In summer, all size-classes preferred small substrates, whereas in winter, areas with cobble-boulder substrates were preferred, especially by trout larger than 10 cm. Wintering trout often shelter among the interstitial spaces of coarse substrates, and to facilitate the survival of juvenile trout through winter, stream management programmes need to ensure that such particles are abundantly available in trout wintering areas.

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Schmieg ◽  
Sven Huppertsberg ◽  
Thomas P. Knepper ◽  
Stefanie Krais ◽  
Katharina Reitter ◽  
...  

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 775 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Winter ◽  
J. S. Tummers ◽  
K. Aarestrup ◽  
H. Baktoft ◽  
M. C. Lucas

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 684-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Brännäs ◽  
Sara Jonsson ◽  
Hans Lundqvist

We studied the benefit of being territorial as an effect of food abundance by measuring the proportions of individuals that displayed a territorial, floating (individuals occasionally displayed territorial behaviour), or nonterritorial (shoaling) behaviour strategy, and individual growth rates. Also, swimming activity was monitored as an indicator of emigration. Replicate groups of 12 juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) were released into an artificial stream channel, fed according to one of four food regimes for 10 days, and allocated to one of three behaviour categories. There was no significant relationship between food abundance and the number of territorial individuals. Instead, the proportions of individuals that displayed the alternative behaviour strategies, i.e., floating and nonterritorial, changed with food abundance. At the lowest food level, more individuals displayed nonterritorial than floating behaviour, but these two strategies were equally represented at the highest food level. The difference in growth rates with respect to behaviour category was highest at intermediate food levels. At the highest and lowest food levels, nonterritorial fish and floaters grew nearly as fast or as poorly, respectively, as the territorial individuals. Swimming activity between the two sections of the stream tank was greatest at the lowest food level, and there was a general tendency (not significant) for the floaters to exhibit the greatest activity.


Author(s):  
Anna Hagelin ◽  
Eva Bergman

Abstract Worldwide declines in salmonid populations have generated major interest in conservation and restoration of wild populations and riverine habitats. Species reintroductions to previous habitats raises questions about their potential impact on these systems. In River Klarälven, landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) has been extinct from upper reaches for over 50 years due to hydropower dams. Here we study competitive interactions between salmon, grayling (Thymallus thymallus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta), that occur in the upper reaches of the river. We examine foraging rates, aggression and activity of juvenile fish in allopatry at three different densities and in sympatry with one or both potential competitors in laboratory flumes. Salmon captured prey less frequently in the presence of brown trout and grayling, whereas grayling and brown trout were unaffected by salmon, but affected each other. Grayling was the most aggressive and active species whereas salmon the least. Consequently, re-introduction of salmon probably will have little impact on grayling and brown trout, whereas grayling and brown trout could affect the success of re-introducing salmon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document