Least Squares Regression Estimates of the Schaefer Production Model: Some Monte Carlo Simulation Results

1980 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1284-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell S. Uhler

Both analytical methods and Monte Carlo experiments are used to determine the amount of bias in the regression estimates of the Schaefer model when it is estimated with catch and effort data. It is shown that the use of the catch–effort ratio and effort as regressors leads to the classical errors in variables problem which produces asymptotically biased parameter estimates. Since the seriousness of the bias, and even its direction in the case of certain formulations of the model, cannot be determined by analytical methods, Monte Carlo simulation experiments were used. Four variations of the Schaefer model were investigated; two of which come from a discrete formulation of the model and two of which come from a continuous formulation. The least squares regression estimates of all formulations result in substantial bias although one formulation is considerably better than the others.Bias in the optimal levels of the population size, the harvest rate, and fishing effort are also calculated. It is found that under likely conditions regarding the model equation errors that the optimal population size and harvest rate may be as much as 40–50% in error depending on the model used. In general, however, the bias in these quantities is much smaller than the bias in the parameter estimates themselves.Key words: Schaefer model, Monte Carlo, optimal fishery management, errors in variables, biased estimates

1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash Sharma ◽  
Srinivas Durvasula ◽  
William R. Dillon

The authors report some results on the behavior of alternative covariance structure estimation procedures in the presence of non-normal data. They conducted Monté Carlo simulation experiments with a factorial design involving three levels of skewness, three level of kurtosis, and three different sample sizes. For normal data, among all the elliptical estimation techniques, elliptical reweighted least squares (ERLS) was equivalent in performance to ML. However, as expected, for non-normal data parameter estimates were unbiased for ML and the elliptical estimation techniques, whereas the bias in standard errors was substantial for GLS and ML. Among elliptical estimation techniques, ERLS was superior in performance. On the basis of the simulation results, the authors recommend that researchers use ERLS for both normal and non-normal data.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alguraibawi ◽  
Habshah Midi ◽  
A. H. M. Rahmatullah Imon

Identification of high leverage point is crucial because it is responsible for inaccurate prediction and invalid inferential statement as it has a larger impact on the computed values of various estimates. It is essential to classify the high leverage points into good and bad leverage points because only the bad leverage points have an undue effect on the parameter estimates. It is now evident that when a group of high leverage points is present in a data set, the existing robust diagnostic plot fails to classify them correctly. This problem is due to the masking and swamping effects. In this paper, we propose a new robust diagnostic plot to correctly classify the good and bad leverage points by reducing both masking and swamping effects. The formulation of the proposed plot is based on the Modified Generalized Studentized Residuals. We investigate the performance of our proposed method by employing a Monte Carlo simulation study and some well-known data sets. The results indicate that the proposed method is able to improve the rate of detection of bad leverage points and also to reduce swamping and masking effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document