Effect of DDT on Discriminating Ability of Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri)

1975 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia G. McNicholl ◽  
W. C. Mackay

Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) trained to discriminate between a bright (723 lx) and a dim (22 lx) light were tested to determine the minimum difference in light intensity they could distinguish before and 71 h after being given DDT orally at 0, 30, 50, and 80% of the LD50 dose. Discriminating ability decreased linearly with increased dose, while performance and retention were unaffected.

1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. MacCrimmon ◽  
Wen-Hwa Kwain

Initial mortality of newly fertilized rainbow trout eggs incubated in artificial light increased with intensity. The mortality among eyed eggs exposed to the same set of conditions was comparatively low regardless of intensity. Mortality, time to hatch, metabolic rate, and the number of vertebrae formed correlated positively with visible light intensity but only during the pre-eyed stage of incubation. By contrast, the numbers of dorsal and anal fin rays were affected by light intensity during the posteyed incubation period, the greatest number of rays on these fins occurring in fish incubated at light intensity of 10 lux. The numbers of pectoral and pelvic fin rays were constant at all test light intensities. Further research is imperative if the importance of light as an environmental factor in the early development of fish is to be understood.


1969 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-hwa Kwain ◽  
Hugh R. MacCrimmon

Rainbow trout exposed in a circular tank to a choice of black or white bottom at a light intensity of 10−2 lux were randomly distributed until the age of 14 months at which time a significant preference for black began and became more pronounced with increasing age.Groups of fish (18–24 months of age) with normal eyes, without eye lenses, and lacking eyes, were held in total darkness and at 10−2, 10, and 200 lux. In total darkness all groups were randomly distributed and quiescent. Fish without eye lenses selected black at all visible light intensities and acted similarly to normal fish at 10−2 lux. Fish lacking eyes were randomly distributed and more-or-less inactive at all intensities.The eye is essential for bottom colour discrimination and behavioural patterns occurring in normal trout exposed to different light intensities.


1966 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 983-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh McCrimmon ◽  
Wen-Hwa Kwain

Fingerling and yearling trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson) responded differently when exposed to a series of artificial daylight illuminations. Fingerling trout showed no apparent response to the overhead cover, being randomly distributed at all light intensities. Yearling trout, except in total darkness, exhibit a positive response to the overhead cover, but their pattern of behaviour differed with the light intensity and the positioning of the cover.


1971 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1801-1804 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. McCauley ◽  
W. L. Pond

Preferred temperatures of underyearling rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) were determined in both vertical and horizontal temperature gradients. No statistically significant difference was found between the preferred temperatures by the two different methods. This suggests that the nature of the gradient plays a lesser role than generally believed in laboratory investigations of temperature preference.


1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torill Bergsjø ◽  
Inger Nafstad ◽  
Kristian Ingebrigtsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document