Predation on Harbour Porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, by a White Shark, Carcharodon carcharias

1972 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1213-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. Arnold
Keyword(s):  
White Shark ◽  
Harbour Porpoise ◽  
Phocoena Phocoena ◽  
Similar Nature ◽  
Carcharodon Carcharias ◽  
Unpublished Observation

A specimen of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, brought into Leonardville, Deer Island, N.B., on August 13, 1971, contained three harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena, in variable states of digestion. This record on predation is discussed in conjunction with literature reports of a similar nature and one other previously unpublished observation.

Spatiotemporal Patterns of White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) Predation at the South Farallon Islands, California

Copeia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 1992 (3) ◽  
pp. 680 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peter Klimley ◽  
Scot D. Anderson ◽  
Peter Pyle ◽  
R. P. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
White Shark ◽  
Spatiotemporal Patterns ◽  
The South ◽  
Carcharodon Carcharias

Potential Rates of Increase of a Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) Population Subjected to Incidental Mortality in Commercial Fisheries

1991 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2429-2435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Woodley ◽  
Andrew J. Read
Keyword(s):  
Gulf Of Maine ◽  
Intrinsic Rate ◽  
Frequency Equation ◽  
Harbour Porpoise ◽  
Population Increase ◽  
Intrinsic Rate Of Increase ◽  
Natural Mortality ◽  
Phocoena Phocoena ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Incidental Mortality

We estimated the potential intrinsic rate of increase (r) of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) population in the Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Maine using empirical data on reproductive rates (mx) and several hypothetical survival (Ix) schedules. Schedules of Ix, to maximum ages of 12 and 15 yr, were calculated from two potential natural mortality (nx) schedules combined with several schedules of incidental mortality (hx) estimates. The most realistic results were obtained when nx of non-calves were calculated from Caugley's (1966. Ecology 47: 906–918) smoothed age-frequency equation for Himalayan thar (Hemitragus jemlahicus) and applied in conjunction with a range of calf natural mortality estimates, this model indicates that harbour porpoises have a limited capacity for population increase, and populations are unlikely to sustain even moderate levels of incidental mortality (4% of the population per year). Extending the maximum age used in the models from 12 to 15 yr does little to increase estimates of r for the harbour porpoise population, and hence their susceptibility to incidental mortality.

scholarly journals Variable response to electric shark deterrents in bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. G. Gauthier ◽  
E. Chateauminois ◽  
M. G. Hoarau ◽  
J. Gadenne ◽  
E. Hoarau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Caledonia ◽  
White Shark ◽  
Mitigation Measures ◽  
Control Board ◽  
Variable Response ◽  
Carcharodon Carcharias ◽  
Behavioural Changes ◽  
Carcharhinus Leucas ◽  
Bull Shark ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Although relatively rare, human-shark interactions and sharks bites are increasing globally, which has led to the development of various mitigation measures. Electric shark deterrents (ESDs) have, so far, been the most effective personal deterrents, but have only been scientifically tested on one of the species most frequently responsible for shark bites, i.e. white shark (Carcharodon carcharias). We tested the effectiveness of five ESDs (E-Shark Force, NoShark, Rpela v2, Freedom + Surf, Freedom + Surf—Shortboard) on bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, over a period of 21 days in September 2019, in New Caledonia. Standardised bait was attached 30 cm below an experimental board that had an active ESD for up to 15 min, or until a bull shark touched the bait or the board. We compared the numbers of baits taken, numbers of passes and reactions around the board, as well as the distance between the sharks and the board among ESDs and against a control board with bait and no active ESD. The Freedom + Surf was the most effective ESD, reducing the amounts of baits taken by 42.3%, while the Rpela v2 and Freedom + Surf—Shortboard also significantly reduced the number of baits taken by 16.5% and 16.2% respectively. Mean distance between sharks and the bait was not affected by the ESDs, but the number of approaches and the proportion of reactions were both significantly higher when the Freedom + Surf was active compared to other ESDs. The effectiveness of all ESDs decreased over time, with the likelihood of the bait being taken increasing and the number of approaches and distance between sharks and the bait decreasing. Our findings show that the ability of ESDs to deter bull shark varies between products, with the Freedom + Surf resulting in the most behavioural changes, followed by the Rpela v2 and Freedom + Surf—Shortboard. However, none of the products tested completely stopped sharks from taking the bait.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document