Geographic, anthropogenic, and habitat influences on Great Lakes coastal wetland fish assemblages

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1328-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anett S. Trebitz ◽  
John C. Brazner ◽  
Nicholas P. Danz ◽  
Mark S. Pearson ◽  
Gregory S. Peterson ◽  
...  

We analyzed data from coastal wetlands across the Laurentian Great Lakes to identify fish assemblage patterns and relationships to habitat, watershed condition, and regional setting. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of electrofishing catch-per-effort data revealed an overriding geographic and anthropogenic stressor gradient that appeared to structure fish composition via impacts on water clarity and vegetation structure. Wetlands in Lakes Erie and Michigan with agricultural watersheds, turbid water, little submerged vegetation, and a preponderance of generalist, tolerant fishes occupied one end of this gradient, while wetlands in Lake Superior with largely natural watersheds, clear water, abundant submerged vegetation, and diverse fishes occupied the other. Fish composition was also related to wetland morphology, hydrology, exposure, and substrate, but this was only evident within low-disturbance wetlands. Anthropogenic stress appears to homogenize fish composition among wetlands and mask other fish–habitat associations. Because land use is strongly spatially patterned across the Great Lakes and aquatic vegetation is a key habitat element that responds to both biogeography and disturbance, it is difficult to disentangle natural from anthropogenic drivers of coastal wetland fish composition.

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 1743-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Brazner ◽  
E W Beals

From May to September in 1990 and 1991, 24 coastal wetland and beach sites in Green Bay, Lake Michigan, were sampled to investigate abiotic and biotic factors influencing fish assemblages; half the sites were modified by human developments, and half were relatively undeveloped. The greatest assemblage differences were observed among regions, but there also were strong differences among assemblages from different habitats. Degree of development had less of an effect on site differences, although assemblages at undeveloped wetlands were unique, and those from developed and undeveloped sites in the upper bay were relatively distinct. The most influential abiotic factors were turbidity, reflecting the trophic gradient in the bay, and a suite of variables associated with macrophyte coverage and diversity, which were critical components of nursery habitats for the primarily immature fishes we captured. The volatile and unpredictable nature of shoreline habitats in the Great Lakes apparently precluded competition and predation from having a strong organizing role. This study demonstrates that undeveloped wetlands are a valuable and intensely utilized fish habitat, particulartly as nursery areas, that should receive special consideration in ecosystem management plans for the Great Lakes.


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anett S. Trebitz ◽  
John C. Brazner ◽  
Valerie J. Brady ◽  
Richard Axler ◽  
Danny K. Tanner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document