Discussion: Sulphur isotope composition of the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: implications for ambient environment, sulphur source, and ore genesis

1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Solomon
Keyword(s):  
New Brunswick ◽  
Isotope Composition ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Massive Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Ore Genesis ◽  
Sulphur Isotope ◽  
Sulphur Source ◽  
Sulphur Isotope Composition ◽  
Bathurst Mining Camp

Sulphur isotope composition of the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: implications for ambient environment, sulphur source, and ore genesis

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne D. Goodfellow ◽  
Jan M. Peter
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Composition ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Massive Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Bacterial Reduction ◽  
Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Sulphur Isotope ◽  
Middle Ordovician ◽  
Bathurst Mining Camp ◽  
Back Arc

The Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit occurs within a Middle Ordovician bimodal volcanic and sedimentary sequence that is thought to have formed in a continental back-arc rift covered with a thick succession of carbonaceous hemipelagic and turbiditic sedimentary rocks. The deposit consists of three en echelon lenses that are zoned from Vent Complex to Bedded Ore and Bedded pyrite facies. The Bedded Ore facies has the lowest average δ34S values (14.2[Formula: see text]), but are only slightly less positive than laminated pyrite in footwall sedimentary rocks (δ34Smean = 15.1[Formula: see text]). δ34S values for the bedded sulphides show an upward increase from 14.2[Formula: see text] in Bedded Ore to 16.5[Formula: see text] in Bedded Pyrite. Average δ34S values for Vent Complex (15.8[Formula: see text]) and underlying stringer sulphides (16.1[Formula: see text]) are consistently more positive than those for Bedded Ore. In carbonaceous shales and siltstone of the Patrick Brook Formation that underlie the deposit, δ34S values that range between 13.8 and 25.6[Formula: see text], and the similarity of these values to those of the Brunswick No. 12 deposit indicate major bacterial reduction of sulphate to sulphide under closed or partly closed conditions, and that most of the S in the deposit originated from ambient sulphidic bottom waters. Furthermore, the average δ34S value for Brunswick No. 12 bedded ores lies on the Selwyn Basin pyrite evolutionary curve and indicates that anoxic conditions within the Tetagouche back-arc basin reflect a global anoxic episode. The Brunswick No. 12 deposit probably formed, therefore, by the mixing of hydrothermal metals with dissolved sulphide of seawater origin during periods of ocean anoxia. The increase of δ34S values towards the Vent Complex may reflect the addition of isotopically heavy S formed by the inorganic reduction of seawater sulphate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document