γ-Tubulin and the fungal microtubule cytoskeleton

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (S1) ◽  
pp. 352-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berl R. Oakley
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole Bodies ◽  
Key Words Tubulin ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Chromosomal Condensation

γ-Tubulin is present in phylogenetically diverse eukaryotes. It is a component of microtubule organizing centers such as the spindle pole bodies of fungi. In Aspergillus nidulans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, it is essential for nuclear division, and, thus, for viability. In A. nidulans, nuclei carrying a γ-tubulin disruption can be maintained in heterokaryons, and the phenotypes caused by the disruption can be determined in uninucleate spores produced by the heterokaryons. Experiments with heterokaryons created in strains with mutations that allow synchronization of the cell cycle reveal that γ-tubulin is not required for the transition from the G1 phase of the cell cycle through S phase to G2, nor for the entry into mitosis as judged by chromosomal condensation. It is, however, required for the formation of the mitotic spindle and for the successful completion of mitosis. Staining with the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody reveals that spindle pole body replication occurs in the absence of functional γ-tubulin. Finally, human γ-tubulin functions in fission yeast, and this indicates that γ-tubulin has similar functions in widely divergent organisms. Key words: tubulin, microtubule, spindle pole body, microtubule organizing center.

scholarly journals Assembly of Yeast Spindle Pole Body and its Components Revealed by Electron Cryo-Tomography

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Li ◽  
Jose-Jesus Fernandez
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
3D Images ◽  
Averaging Methods ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Subtomogram Averaging

AbstractSpindle pole body (SPB) is the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) in yeast. It plays essential roles during many cellular processes, ranging from mitosis to karyogamy. Here, we used electron cryo-tomography (cryo-ET) and image processing to study SPB and its component purified from the budding yeast. The 3D images and models of SPB at various cell cycle stages were reconstructed by cryo-ET and were analyzed. The results reveal SPB as a cylindrical shaped structure composed of multiple layers. The central layers are arranged with a degree of crystalline order. By using subtomogram averaging methods, we studied the purified “sheet” from over-expressed Spc42p. Our analysis of the SPBs and its components provides new insights into the assembly of this organelle and its cellular function as an MTOC.

scholarly journals Budding Yeast Bub2 Is Localized at Spindle Pole Bodies and Activates the Mitotic Checkpoint via a Different Pathway from Mad2

1999 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Fraschini ◽  
Elisa Formenti ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Simonetta Piatti
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Pole Bodies

The mitotic checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression before anaphase in case of mistakes in the alignment of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. In budding yeast, the Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 2, 3 proteins mediate this arrest. Vertebrate homologues of Mad1, 2, 3, and Bub1, 3 bind to unattached kinetochores and prevent progression through mitosis by inhibiting Cdc20/APC-mediated proteolysis of anaphase inhibitors, like Pds1 and B-type cyclins. We investigated the role of Bub2 in budding yeast mitotic checkpoint. The following observations indicate that Bub2 and Mad1, 2 probably activate the checkpoint via different pathways: (a) unlike the other Mad and Bub proteins, Bub2 localizes at the spindle pole body (SPB) throughout the cell cycle; (b) the effect of concomitant lack of Mad1 or Mad2 and Bub2 is additive, since nocodazole-treated mad1 bub2 and mad2 bub2 double mutants rereplicate DNA more rapidly and efficiently than either single mutant; (c) cell cycle progression of bub2 cells in the presence of nocodazole requires the Cdc26 APC subunit, which, conversely, is not required for mad2 cells in the same conditions. Altogether, our data suggest that activation of the mitotic checkpoint blocks progression through mitosis by independent and partially redundant mechanisms.

scholarly journals Brr6 drives the Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle pole body nuclear envelope insertion/extrusion cycle

2011 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiina Tamm ◽  
Agnes Grallert ◽  
Emily P.S. Grossman ◽  
Isabel Alvarez-Tabares ◽  
Frances E. Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Cytoplasmic Face ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Nuclear Component ◽  
Anaphase B

The fission yeast interphase spindle pole body (SPB) is a bipartite structure in which a bulky cytoplasmic domain is separated from a nuclear component by the nuclear envelope. During mitosis, the SPB is incorporated into a fenestra that forms within the envelope during mitotic commitment. Closure of this fenestra during anaphase B/mitotic exit returns the cytoplasmic component to the cytoplasmic face of an intact interphase nuclear envelope. Here we show that Brr6 is transiently recruited to SPBs at both SPB insertion and extrusion. Brr6 is required for both SPB insertion and nuclear envelope integrity during anaphase B/mitotic exit. Genetic interactions with apq12 and defective sterol assimilation suggest that Brr6 may alter envelope composition at SPBs to promote SPB insertion and extrusion. The restriction of the Brr6 domain to eukaryotes that use a polar fenestra in an otherwise closed mitosis suggests a conserved role in fenestration to enable a single microtubule organizing center to nucleate both cytoplasmic and nuclear microtubules on opposing sides of the nuclear envelope.

scholarly journals Translational control of MPS1 links protein synthesis with the initiation of cell division and spindle pole body duplication in yeast

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi M. Blank ◽  
Annabel Alonso ◽  
Mark Winey ◽  
Michael Polymenis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Structured Illumination Microscopy ◽  
Couple Growth ◽  
Pole Body

ABSTRACTProtein synthesis underpins cell growth and controls when cells commit to a new round of cell division at a point in late G1 of the cell cycle called Start. Passage through Start also coincides with the duplication of the microtubule-organizing centers, the yeast spindle pole bodies, which will form the two poles of the mitotic spindle that segregates the chromosomes in mitosis. The conserved Mps1p kinase governs the duplication of the spindle pole body in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we show that the MPS1 transcript has a short upstream open reading frame that represses the synthesis of Mps1p. Mutating the MPS1 uORF makes the cells smaller, accelerates the appearance of Mps1p in late G1, and promotes completion of Start. The accelerated Start of MPS1 uORF mutants depends on the G1 cyclin Cln3p. Monitoring the spindle pole body in the cell cycle using structured illumination microscopy revealed that mutating the MPS1 uORF enabled cells to duplicate their spindle pole body earlier, at a smaller cell size. For the first time, these results identify growth inputs in mechanisms that control duplication of the microtubule-organizing center and implicate these processes in general mechanisms that couple growth with division.

scholarly journals The 110-kD spindle pole body component of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a phosphoprotein that is modified in a cell cycle-dependent manner.

1996 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
D B Friedman ◽  
H A Sundberg ◽  
E Y Huang ◽  
T N Davis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
A Cell ◽  
In Cells

Spc110p (Nuf1p) is an essential component of the yeast microtubule organizing center, or spindle pole body (SPB). Asynchronous wild-type cultures contain two electrophoretically distinct isoforms of Spc110p as detected by Western blot analysis, suggesting that Spc110p is modified in vivo. Both isoforms incorporate 32Pi in vivo, suggesting that Spc110p is post-translationally modified by phosphorylation. The slower-migrating 120-kD Spc110p isoform after incubation is converted to the faster-migrating 112-kD isoform after incubation with protein phosphatase PP2A, and specific PP2A inhibitors block this conversion. Thus, additional phosphorylation of Spc110p at serine and/or threonine residues gives rise to the slower-migrating 120-kD isoform. The 120-kD isoform predominates in cells arrested in mitosis by the addition of nocodazole. However, the 120-kD isoform is not detectable in cells grown to stationary phase (G0) or in cells arrested in G1 by the addition of alpha-factor. Temperature-sensitive cell division cycle (cdc) mutations demonstrate that the presence of the 120-kD isoform correlates with mitotic spindle formation but not with SPB duplication. In a synchronous wild-type population, the additional serine/threonine phosphorylation that gives rise to the 120-kD isoform appears as cells are forming the mitotic spindle and diminishes as cells enter anaphase. None of several sequences similar to the consensus for phosphorylation by the Cdc28p (cdc2p34) kinase is important for these mitosis-specific phosphorylations or for function. Carboxy-terminal Spc110p truncations lacking the calmodulin binding site can support growth and are also phosphorylated in a cell cycle-specific manner. Further truncation of the Spc110p carboxy terminus results in mutant proteins that are unable to support growth and now migrate as single species. Collectively, these results provide the first evidence of a structural component of the SPB that is phosphorylated during spindle formation and dephosphorylated as cells enter anaphase.

scholarly journals Fission yeast MOZART1/Mzt1 is an essential γ-tubulin complex component required for complex recruitment to the microtubule organizing center, but not its assembly

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 2894-2906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirohisa Masuda ◽  
Risa Mori ◽  
Masashi Yukawa ◽  
Takashi Toda
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Microtubule Organization ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Core Components

γ-Tubulin plays a universal role in microtubule nucleation from microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) such as the animal centrosome and fungal spindle pole body (SPB). γ-Tubulin functions as a multiprotein complex called the γ-tubulin complex (γ-TuC), consisting of GCP1–6 (GCP1 is γ-tubulin). In fungi and flies, it has been shown that GCP1–3 are core components, as they are indispensable for γ-TuC complex assembly and cell division, whereas the other three GCPs are not. Recently a novel conserved component, MOZART1, was identified in humans and plants, but its precise functions remain to be determined. In this paper, we characterize the fission yeast homologue Mzt1, showing that it is essential for cell viability. Mzt1 is present in approximately equal stoichiometry with Alp4/GCP2 and localizes to all the MTOCs, including the SPB and interphase and equatorial MTOCs. Temperature-sensitive mzt1 mutants display varying degrees of compromised microtubule organization, exhibiting multiple defects during both interphase and mitosis. Mzt1 is required for γ-TuC recruitment, but not sufficient to localize to the SPB, which depends on γ-TuC integrity. Intriguingly, the core γ-TuC assembles in the absence of Mzt1. Mzt1 therefore plays a unique role within the γ-TuC components in attachment of this complex to the major MTOC site.

scholarly journals Analysis of Tub4p, a yeast gamma-tubulin-like protein: implications for microtubule-organizing center function.

1996 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 443-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
L G Marschall ◽  
R L Jeng ◽  
J Mulholland ◽  
T Stearns
Keyword(s):  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Gamma Tubulin

gamma-Tubulin is a conserved component of microtubule-organizing centers and is thought to be involved in microtubule nucleation. A recently discovered Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene (TUB4) encodes a tubulin that is related to, but divergent from, gamma-tubulins. TUB4 is essential for cell viability, and epitope-tagged Tub4 protein (Tub4p) is localized to the spindle pole body (Sobel, S.G., and M. Snyder. 1995.J. Cell Biol. 131:1775-1788). We have characterized the expression of TUB4, the association of Tub4p with the spindle pole body, and its role in microtubule organization. Tub4p is a minor protein in the cell, and expression of TUB4 is regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Wild-type Tub4p is localized to the spindle pole body, and a Tub4p-green fluorescent protein fusion is able to associate with a preexisting spindle pole body, suggesting that there is dynamic exchange between cytoplasmic and spindle pole body forms of Tub4p. Perturbation of Tub4p function, either by conditional mutation or by depletion of the protein, results in spindle as well as spindle pole body defects, but does not eliminate the ability of microtubules to regrow from, or remain attached to, the spindle pole body. The spindle pole bodies in tub4 mutant cells duplicate but do not separate, resulting in a monopolar spindle. EM revealed that one spindle pole body of the duplicated pair appears to be defective for the nucleation of microtubules. These results offer insight into the role of gamma-tubulin in microtubule-organizing center function.

Evidence for cell cycle-specific, spindle pole body-mediated, nuclear positioning in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (16) ◽  
pp. 1851-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Hagan ◽  
M. Yanagida
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Nuclear Positioning ◽  
Central Location ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole Bodies ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Multiple Spindle

Specific changes in spatial order occur during cell cycle progression in fission yeast. Growth of the rod-shaped cells is highly regulated and undergoes a cell cycle and size-regulated switch from monopolar to bipolar tip extension. During both phases of growth, the interphase nucleus is maintained in a central location. Following the separation of the genome to the cell tips in mitosis, the two nuclei migrate back towards the cell equator before stopping in two new positions that will become the middle of the two new cells. Here we use simultaneous labeling of microtubules, chromatin and spindle pole bodies in wild-type and cdc mutants, to show that nuclear positioning is achieved by regulation of spindle pole body-mediated nuclear migration. We show that the number and location of nuclear positioning signals is regulated in a cell cycle-specific manner and that spindle pole body-mediated forces are likely to be responsible for maintaining correct nuclear position once the nuclei have reached the appropriate position in the cell. Accentuating the movement of the nuclei back towards the cell equator after mitosis by artificially increasing cell length shows that the spindle pole body leads the nucleus during this migration. When multiple spindle pole bodies are associated with the same or different nuclei they all go to the same point indicating that the different spindle pole bodies are responding to the same positional cue. In a septation-defective mutant cell, which contains four nuclei, the spindle pole bodies on the four different nuclei initially group as two pairs in regions that would become the middle of the new cells, were the cell able to divide. In the subsequent interphase, the nuclei aggregate as a group of four in the centre of the cell. The presence of two or three clusters of spindle pole bodies in larger cells with eight nuclei suggests that the mechanisms specifying the normally central location for multiple nuclei may be unable to operate properly as the cells get larger. Perturbation of microtubules with the microtubule poison thiabendazole prevents the spindle pole body clustering in septation mutants, demonstrating that nuclear positioning requires a functional microtubule cytoskeleton.

scholarly journals Constitutive dynein activity inshe1mutants reveals differences in microtubule attachment at the yeast spindle pole body

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2319-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zane J. Bergman ◽  
Xue Xia ◽  
I. Alexandra Amaro ◽  
Tim C. Huffaker
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Center ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Organizing Center ◽  
Cytoplasmic Microtubules ◽  
G1 Cells

The organization of microtubules is determined in most cells by a microtubule-organizing center, which nucleates microtubule assembly and anchors their minus ends. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells lacking She1, cytoplasmic microtubules detach from the spindle pole body at high rates. Increased rates of detachment depend on dynein activity, supporting previous evidence that She1 inhibits dynein. Detachment rates are higher in G1 than in metaphase cells, and we show that this is primarily due to differences in the strengths of microtubule attachment to the spindle pole body during these stages of the cell cycle. The minus ends of detached microtubules are stabilized by the presence of γ-tubulin and Spc72, a protein that tethers the γ-tubulin complex to the spindle pole body. A Spc72–Kar1 fusion protein suppresses detachment in G1 cells, indicating that the interaction between these two proteins is critical to microtubule anchoring. Overexpression of She1 inhibits the loading of dynactin components, but not dynein, onto microtubule plus ends. In addition, She1 binds directly to microtubules in vitro, so it may compete with dynactin for access to microtubules. Overall, these results indicate that inhibition of dynein activity by She1 is important to prevent excessive detachment of cytoplasmic microtubules, particularly in G1 cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document