Tight Second Stage Formulations in Two-Stage Stochastic Mixed Integer Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 788-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish Bansal ◽  
Kuo-Ling Huang ◽  
Sanjay Mehrotra
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Integer Programs ◽  
Mixed Integer Programs ◽  
Second Stage

scholarly journals Exploiting the Structure of Two-Stage Robust Optimization Models with Exponential Scenarios

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Hashemi Doulabi ◽  
Patrick Jaillet ◽  
Gilles Pesant ◽  
Louis-Martin Rousseau
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Optimization Models ◽  
Master Problem ◽  
Maximization Problem ◽  
Planning Problem ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Integer Programs ◽  
Mixed Integer Programs

This paper addresses a class of two-stage robust optimization models with an exponential number of scenarios given implicitly. We apply Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition to exploit the structure of these models and show that the original problem reduces to a single-stage robust problem. We propose a Benders algorithm for the reformulated single-stage problem. We also develop a heuristic algorithm that dualizes the linear programming relaxation of the inner maximization problem in the reformulated model and iteratively generates cuts to shape the convex hull of the uncertainty set. We combine this heuristic with the Benders algorithm to create a more effective hybrid Benders algorithm. Because the master problem and subproblem in the Benders algorithm are mixed-integer programs, it is computationally demanding to solve them optimally at each iteration of the algorithm. Therefore, we develop novel stopping conditions for these mixed-integer programs and provide the relevant convergence proofs. Extensive computational experiments on a nurse planning problem and a two-echelon supply chain problem are performed to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

A Novel Approach for Two-Stage UAV Path Planning in Pipeline Network Inspection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Qiu ◽  
Yongtu Liang
Keyword(s):  
Path Planning ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Flight Path ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Calculation Time ◽  
Pipeline Network ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Computational Performance

Abstract Currently, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) provides the possibility of comprehensive coverage and multi-dimensional visualization of pipeline monitoring. Encouraged by industry policy, research on UAV path planning in pipeline network inspection has emerged. The difficulties of this issue lie in strict operational requirements, variable flight missions, as well as unified optimization for UAV deployment and real-time path planning. Meanwhile, the intricate structure and large scale of the pipeline network further complicate this issue. At present, there is still room to improve the practicality and applicability of the mathematical model and solution strategy. Aiming at this problem, this paper proposes a novel two-stage optimization approach for UAV path planning in pipeline network inspection. The first stage is conventional pre-flight planning, where the requirement for optimality is higher than calculation time. Therefore, a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model is established and solved by the commercial solver to obtain the optimal UAV number, take-off location and detailed flight path. The second stage is re-planning during the flight, taking into account frequent pipeline accidents (e.g. leaks and cracks). In this stage, the flight path must be timely rescheduled to identify specific hazardous locations. Thus, the requirement for calculation time is higher than optimality and the genetic algorithm is used for solution to satisfy the timeliness of decision-making. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the UAV inspection of a branched oil and gas transmission pipeline network with 36 nodes and the results are analyzed in detail in terms of computational performance. In the first stage, compared to manpower inspection, the total cost and time of UAV inspection is decreased by 54% and 56% respectively. In the second stage, it takes less than 1 minute to obtain a suboptimal solution, verifying the applicability and superiority of the method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document