scholarly journals Indicators of the quality of general practice care of patients with chronic illness: a step towards the real involvement of patients in the assessment of the quality of care.

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wensing ◽  
R Grol ◽  
P van Montfort ◽  
A Smits
Author(s):  
Candace Necyk ◽  
Jeffrey A. Johnson ◽  
Ross T. Tsuyuki ◽  
Dean T. Eurich

Background: In 2012, the Government of Alberta introduced a funding program to remunerate pharmacists to develop a comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) for patients with complex needs. The objective of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of the care they received through the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta. Methods: We invited 3442 patients who received a pharmacist-billed CACP within the previous 3 months and 6888 matched controls across Alberta to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of the short version Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-11), with 3 additional pharmacy-specific assessment questions added. Additional questions related to health status and demographics were also included. Results: Overall, most patients indicated a low level of chronic illness care by pharmacists, with few differences noted between CACP patients and non-CACP controls. Of note, controls reported higher quality of care for 5 domains within the adapted PACIC-like tool compared with CACP patients ( p < 0.05 for all). Interestingly, only 79 (44%) of CACP patients reported that they had received a CACP, whereas only 192 (66%) of control patients reported that they did not receive a care plan. In a sensitivity analysis including only these respondents, individuals who received a CACP perceived a significantly higher quality of chronic illness care across all PACIC domains. Conclusion: Overall, chronic illness care incentivized by the pharmacist CACP program in Alberta is perceived to be moderate to low. When limited to respondents who explicitly recognized receiving the service or not, the perceptions of quality of care were more positive. This suggests that better implementation of CACP by pharmacists may be associated with improved quality of care and that some redesign is needed to engage patients more. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S Abdelhamid ◽  
S. Maisey ◽  
N. Steel

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (595) ◽  
pp. e91-e98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Connolly ◽  
Steve Iliffe ◽  
Ella Gaehl ◽  
Stephen Campbell ◽  
Richard Drake ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Wetzel ◽  
Wolfgang Himmel ◽  
Regine Heidenreich ◽  
Eva Hummers-Pradier ◽  
Michael M Kochen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (559) ◽  
pp. e32-e37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivatharan Vedavanam ◽  
Nicholas Steel ◽  
Joanne Broadbent ◽  
Susan Maisey ◽  
Amanda Howe

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle L. Penn ◽  
Joan R. Burns ◽  
Andrew Georgiou ◽  
P. Gawaine Powell Davies ◽  
Mark F. Harris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document