scholarly journals The role of physical workload and pain related fear in the development of low back pain in young workers: evidence from the BelCoBack Study; results after one year of follow up

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Van Nieuwenhuyse
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Physical Workload ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Young Workers ◽  
Study Results ◽  
One Year

Early Intervention Options for Acute Low Back Pain Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial with One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis Whitfill ◽  
Robbie Haggard ◽  
Samuel M. Bierner ◽  
Glenn Pransky ◽  
Robert G. Hassett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Early Intervention ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Acute Low Back Pain ◽  
One Year ◽  
Pain Patients

Spinal manipulation compared with back school and with individually delivered physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Cecchi ◽  
Raffaello Molino-Lova ◽  
Massimiliano Chiti ◽  
Guido Pasquini ◽  
Anita Paperini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Back School ◽  
One Year

One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Flexion Distraction with an Exercise Program for Chronic Low-Back Pain

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 659-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerrilyn A. Cambron ◽  
M. Ram Gudavalli ◽  
Donald Hedeker ◽  
Marion McGregor ◽  
James Jedlicka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Low Back ◽  
One Year

One-Year Follow-Up in Employees Sick-Listed Because of Low Back Pain

Spine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 1180-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Jensen ◽  
Ole Kudsk Jensen ◽  
David Høyrup Christiansen ◽  
Claus Vinther Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Local Anesthetic with or without Steroid in Chronic Lumbosacral Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 3;18 (3;5) ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Babita Ghai
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Time Points ◽  
One Year

Background: Epidural injections (EI) are the most commonly performed minimally invasive intervention to manage chronic low back pain (CLBP) with lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP). Local anesthetic (LA) and/ or steroids are frequently used injectates for EI and are reported with variable effectiveness. The majority of earlier studies have used either caudal, transforaminal (TF), or undefined interlaminar approaches for EI. The parasaggital interlaminar (PIL) approach route is reported to have good ventral epidural spread and comparable effectiveness to the TF route. However, there is a lack of head-to-head comparative effectiveness research of LA with or without steroid for managing CLBP with LRP using a PIL approach. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of EI of LA alone and LA with steroid using a PIL approach for managing CLBP with LRP. Study Design: Randomized, double blind, active control one year follow-up study. Setting: Interventional pain management clinic in a tertiary care center in India. Methods: Sixty-nine patients were randomized to receive fluoroscopic guided EI of either 8 mL of 0.5% lidocaine (group L, n = 34) or 6 mL of 0.5% lidocaine mixed with 80 mg (2 mL) of methylprednisolone acetate (group LS, n = 35). Patients were evaluated for pain intensity using 0 – 10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and functional disability using Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) at baseline; and 2 weeks, one, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after injection. Patients with inefficacy with the initial injection or response deterioration received an additional injection of the same injectate and dose. Patients were evaluated for achieving effective pain relief (EPR, i.e., ≥ 50% from baseline), overall NRS and MODQ, number of injections, and presence of ventral and perineural spread over one year follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving EPR at 3 months. Results: A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved EPR at 3 months in group LS [30 (86%, 90% CI 73% – 93%)] as compared to group L [17 (50%, 90% CI 36% – 64%)] (P = 0.02). Similar results were obtained at 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The probability of achieving EPR was significantly higher in group LS at various time-points during the one year follow-up as compared to group L (P = 0.01) A significant reduction in NRS and improvement in MODQ were observed at all time-points post-intervention compared to baseline (P < 0.001) in both groups. NRS and MODQ scores were significantly lower in group LS as compared to group L at all time intervals post baseline. On average patients in group L received 2.0 (0.85) and group LS received 1.7 (0.71) injections annually (P = 0.07). Ventral epidural spread was comparable in both groups (97%). No major complications were encountered in either group; however, intravascular spread of contrast was noted during 2 injections (one in each group) requiring relocation. Limitations: A single center study, lack of documentation of adjuvant therapies like individual analgesic medication, and lack of placebo group. Conclusions: Using a PIL approach and the addition of steroid to LA for EI may provide superior effectiveness in terms of extent and duration of pain relief for managing CLBP with unilateral LRP, even though, local anesthetic alone also was effective. Trial registration: CTRI/2014/04/004572 Key words: Epidural injection, epidural steroid, chronic low back pain, chronic lumbosacral pain, parasagittal interlaminar

scholarly journals Schwannoma of the lumbar spine

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-117
Author(s):  
Manoel Baldoino Leal Filho ◽  
Raimundo Gerônimo Da Silva Júnior ◽  
Luciana Maria Pinheiro Leal
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Common Occurrence ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Important Improvement ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
One Year

Objective: To show a case of lumbar spine schwannoma that presented with low back pain and sciatica. Case: A patient that presented with low back pain and sciatica. The Gadoliniumenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed a lumbar L4-L5 schwannoma. He underwent lumbar laminotomy and intradural microsurgery. The lesion was totally removed. There was an important improvement on postoperative and at one-year follow up MRI showed no tumor. Conclusion: The authors stress that spine schwannoma should be considered inthe differential diagnosis of a patient experiencing symptoms of disc herniation, a disease of more common occurrence. 

scholarly journals On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study

1998 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J M van den Hoogen ◽  
B. W Koes ◽  
J. T. M van Eijk ◽  
L. M Bouter ◽  
W. Deville
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
One Year

A one-year follow-up with aqueous Harpagophytum extract Doloteffin® for low back pain

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Chrubasik ◽  
O Künzel ◽  
J Thanner ◽  
C Conradt ◽  
A Black
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
One Year
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document