scholarly journals P858 An open-label, multi-center trial of INO-5401 and INO-9012 delivered by electroporation (EP) in combination with cemiplimab in subjects with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A8.1-A8
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Skolnik ◽  
David Reardon ◽  
Steven Brem ◽  
Arati Desai ◽  
Stephen Bagley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
List Type ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
New York University ◽  
Synthetic Dna ◽  
Mgmt Promoter

BackgroundGBM is one of the most deadly cancers and treatment is surgery, followed by radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) daily during RT followed by cycles of TMZ for select patients.1 New immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibition, may benefit patients with GBM. T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve overall survival (OS). In this study, a novel antigen-specific T cell-generating therapy, INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding for human telomerase [hTERT], Wilms Tumor-1 [WT-1] and prostate specific membrane antigen [PSMA]), plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding for IL-12), with the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, cemiplimab, was given to patients with newly-diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of the combination.MethodsPhase I/II, single arm, two cohort study (A: MGMT Promoter Unmethylated, B: MGMT Promoter Methylated). The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of INO-5401 and INO-9012 followed by EP with CELLECTRA® 2000 in combination with cemiplimab. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of preliminary clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Treatment is with 9 mg INO-5401 with 1 mg INO-9012 every three weeks (Q3W) for four doses, then Q9W; and cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over three weeks; TMZ is given concurrent with radiation (Cohorts A and B), followed by maintenance TMZ (Cohort B).Results52 patients were enrolled onto this study; 32 in Cohort A and 20 in Cohort B. 18 were women (35%) and 47 were white (90%). The median age was 60 years (range 19-78 years). The most common Grade ≥3 adverse events were elevations in alanine or aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST; 5 patients), and tumor inflammation/edema (5 patients); there was one Grade 5 unrelated event of urosepsis. The only related SAE reported in more than one patient was pyrexia. 22 patients (42%) reported immune-related AEs, with the most common being elevations in ALT or AST (8 patients), and were reported most commonly within the first nine weeks of treatment. The safety profile was consistent with that of patients with GBM and of checkpoint inhibitors. ELISpot assessments performed to date demonstrated the majority of patients have T cell responses to INO-5401. PFS6 was 75% (95% CI 56.6, 88.5) in Cohort A (preliminary; Cohort B pending).ConclusionsINO-5401 + INO-9012 with cemiplimab has an acceptable safety profile, is immunogenic and is potentially efficacious in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. This combination is promising; survival results will be updated next year.Trial RegistrationNCT03491683.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by New York University institution’s Ethics Board; approval number i17-00764.ReferencesStupp R, et al. (2009). Lancet Oncology 10(5): 459–466.

Clinical and Immunological Activity of WT1 Peptide Vaccination in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplasia: Results of a Phase II Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 567-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Keilholz ◽  
Anne Letsch ◽  
Antonia Busse ◽  
Anne M. Asemissen ◽  
Alexander Schmittel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Clinical Activity

Abstract The transcription factor Wilms tumor protein (WT) 1 belongs to a new generation of tumor antigens, which are essential for tumor cell proliferation. WT1 is highly expressed in AML and in MDS upon appearance of blasts. A phase II trial of vaccination with the HLA-A2-restricted WT1.126–134 peptide was performed in patients with AML and MDS and overexpression of WT1 to determine immunogenicity and clinical activity. Patients received vaccinations with 0.2 mg WT1.126–134 peptide (day 3), 62.5 mcg dendritic cell-stimulating adjuvant GM-CSF (days 1–4) and 1 mg T helper protein keyhole limpet hemocyanin (day 3). The initial 13 patients were to receive 4 biweekly and subsequent 4-weekly vaccinations, the subsequent 13 patients were continuously vaccinated biweekly. Vaccination was continued in absence of overt disease progression. WT1 levels were assessed by quantitative RT-PCR and WT1-specific T cell responses by tetramer analyses and cytokine flow cytometry. Response assessment following IWG-MDS criteria was used, capturing stable disease and hematologic improvement. A duration of 8 weeks was required for stable disease. Enrolment was completed in June 2006 with 24 patients with AML and 2 with MDS (RAEB). Of the 24 AML patients, 16 had > 5% marrow blasts at study onset (8 without prior chemotherapy, 4 with disease persistence following chemotherapy, 4 with PR), and 8 were in CR at high risk for relapse. A median of 10 (range 4 – 23) vaccinations was administered with 8 patients currently still under treatment. No significant toxicity occurred. To date, 22 patients are evaluable for clinical response. Overall, 8/16 patients with > 5% marrow blasts at study onset displayed clinical efficacy of vaccine treatment (SD or better). One AML patient achieved CR for 12 months after brief initial progression, and 7 patients had disease stabilization (2, 2+, 3, 3, 6, 10+, 14 months). One of these patients with RAEBII had a major response of neutrophils and platelets, and one AML patient had initial progression and subsequent transient complete clearance of peripheral blasts. WT1 transcripts as molecular disease marker decreased at least 3-fold (range 3-fold - >50-fold, median >10-fold) in 12 of 20 currently evaluated patients, including all 8 patients with evidence of clinical efficacy and 4 of 5 AML patients vaccinated in CR. The generation of a WT1-specific T cell response in peripheral blood and bone marrow was detected in 12 of 16 evaluated patients including all 6 of these 16 patients with evidence for clinical efficacy. This study shows that WT1 vaccination has promising antileukemia activity. A multicenter comparative WT1 vaccination study in CR patients at high risk of relapse is currently initiated.

scholarly journals LTBK-01. INO-5401 AND INO-9012 DELIVERED INTRAMUSCULARLY (IM) WITH ELECTROPORATION (EP) IN COMBINATION WITH CEMIPLIMAB (REGN2810) IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii237-ii237
Author(s):  
David A Reardon ◽  
Steven Brem ◽  
Arati Suvas Desai ◽  
Stephen Joseph Bagley ◽  
Sylvia Christine Kurz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Synthetic Dna ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Gene Transcripts ◽  
Dna Plasmid

Abstract BACKGROUND Novel T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve OS in GBM. INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding hTERT, WT-1, PSMA) plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12), and the PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab, is given to patients with newly diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, efficacy and immunogenicity. METHODS Phase I/II, single arm, 2 cohort study (A: MGMT unmethylated, B: MGMT methylated). Primary endpoint is safety; efficacy and immunogenicity are secondary. Nine mg INO-5401 plus 1 mg INO-9012 (every 3 weeks x 4 doses, then Q9W) is given IM with EP by CELLECTRA® 2000 with cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over 3 weeks. TMZ is given with radiation (all patients), and adjuvantly (Cohort B only). RESULTS Fifty-two subjects enrolled: 32 in Cohort A; 20 in Cohort B. 35% women; median age 60 years (19–78 years). The adverse event profile is consistent with single-agent (INO-5401, INO-9012, EP and cemiplimab) reported events. OS at 12 months was 84.4% (Cohort A) and 85% (Cohort B). OS at 18 months in Cohort A is 50% (95% CI 31.9 - 68.1); median OS is 17.9 months (14.5 - NR); Cohort B OS18 and median OS will be presented. Tumor gene transcripts at diagnosis confirmed expression of INO-5401 antigens. Peripheral immune responses following INO-5401 revealed antigen-specific T cell responses by Interferon gamma ELISpot and flow cytometry, including cytokine production and expansion of antigen specific CD8+T cells with lytic potential. CONCLUSIONS INO-5401 + INO-9012, a novel DNA plasmid immunotherapy, demonstrates acceptable risk/benefit and generates robust systemic immune responses to encoded tumor antigens when administered with cemiplimab and RT/TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Overall survival is encouraging. Clinical trial information: NCT03491683.

INO-5401 and INO-9012 delivered intramuscularly (IM) with electroporation (EP) in combination with cemiplimab (REGN2810) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM): Interim results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2514-2514
Author(s):  
David A. Reardon ◽  
Steven Brem ◽  
Arati Suvas Desai ◽  
Stephen Joseph Bagley ◽  
Sylvia Christine Kurz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Synthetic Dna ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Tumor Inflammation ◽  
Grade 3

2514 Background: Novel T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve OS in GBM. INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding for hTERT, WT-1 and PSMA), plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12), with the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab, is given to patients with newly-diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, efficacy and immunogenicity of the combination. Methods: Phase I/II, single arm, 2 cohort study (A: MGMT unmethylated, B: MGMT methylated). The primary endpoint is safety; efficacy and immunogenicity are secondary. Nine mg INO-5401 plus 1 mg INO-9012 (every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then Q9W) is given with EP by CELLECTRA 2000 with cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over 3 weeks. TMZ is given with radiation (all patients), followed by maintenance (Cohort B only). Results: Fifty two subjects were enrolled: 32 in Cohort A; 20 in Cohort B. 35% women and 90% white. Median age 60 years (range 19-78 years). Common Grade ≥3 AEs reported were: platelet count decreased (11.5%), tumor inflammation (7.7%), seizure (7.7%), ALT increased (7.7%), lymphocyte count decreased (7.7.%). One Grade 5 unrelated event of urosepsis was reported. Of 69 SAEs reported there was only 1 related to the combination therapy, Grade 1 pyrexia. 48% of subjects reported irAEs, most frequently ALT increased (9.6%), AST increased (7.7%), diarrhea (7.7%), pyrexia (7.7%) and tumor inflammation (7.7%). 71% of the reported SAEs and irAEs occurred within the first 12 weeks of treatment. OS at 12 months was 84.4% (95% CI 67.2, 94.7) in Cohort A; Cohort B will be presented at ASCO. ELISpot assessments demonstrated T cell responses to INO-5401. Flow cytometry demonstrated evidence of activated INO-5401-specific CD8+T cells with lytic potential (CD38+Prf+GrzA+) when compared with baseline, post-treatment in the majority of patients assayed. Conclusions: INO-5401 + INO-9012 in combination with cemiplimab and RT/TMZ has an acceptable safety profile, is immunogenic and may show a survival advantage in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. OS18 data will be presented later this year. Clinical trial information: NCT03491683 .

IMMUNOREACTIVE GROWTH HORMONE IN PLASMA AND URINE IN JUVENILE DIABETICS BEFORE AND DURING INITIAL INSULIN TREATMENT

1974 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian F. Hanssen
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Insulin Treatment ◽  
Juvenile Diabetes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
List Type ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Renal Tubular Reabsorption ◽  
Juvenile Diabetics ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Renal Tubular

ABSTRACT Twenty newly diagnosed, but as yet untreated patients of both sexes with classical juvenile diabetes were investigated by determining the mean plasma immunoreactive growth hormone (IRHGH) and urinary IRHGH for a 24 hour period before and during initial insulin treatment. The plasma IRHGH was significantly higher (0.05 > P > 0.01) before than during initial insulin treatment. During initial insulin treatment, the mean plasma IRHGH was significantly higher (0.01 > P > 0.001) than in a control group. The urinary IRHGH was significantly higher (0.01 > P > 0.001) before than during insulin treatment. The increased urinary IRHGH observed before insulin treatment is thought to be partly due to a defective renal tubular reabsorption of growth hormone. No significant correlation was found between the mean blood sugar and plasma or urinary IRHGH either before or during insulin treatment.

Aberrant activation of CD8+ T-cell and CD8+ T-cell subsets in patients with newly diagnosed IDDM

Diabetes ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1414-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hehmke ◽  
D. Michaelis ◽  
E. Gens ◽  
F. Laube ◽  
K. D. Kohnert
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Subsets ◽  
Newly Diagnosed
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document