scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 740-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
M F Dillon
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Practice

Reflex Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) in Breast Needle Core Biopsy Specimens

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1090-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. VandenBussche ◽  
Ashley Cimino-Mathews ◽  
Ben Ho Park ◽  
Leisha A. Emens ◽  
Theodore N. Tsangaris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy ◽  
Biopsy Specimens

Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases

2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen Matrai ◽  
Timothy M. D'Alfonso ◽  
Lindsay Pharmer ◽  
Michele B. Drotman ◽  
Rache M. Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Radial Scar ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

Context Radial scars are benign sclerosing lesions that are routinely excised when diagnosed in a needle core biopsy. Optimal management for patients with incidental and small (≤5 mm) radial scars is uncertain. Objective To assess pathologic upgrade of radial scars diagnosed in needle core biopsy samples and identify a subset of patients who could benefit from conservative management. Design Patients with a diagnosis of radial scar in a needle core biopsy who underwent excision of the biopsied area were identified. Radial scars greater than 5 mm in size and those with coexisting atypia, carcinoma, and papillary lesions were excluded. After histologic-radiographic correlation, rates of pathologic upgrade were assessed. Results Seventy-seven radial scars diagnosed in 66 patients were included. Overall, 9 of 77 (12%) showed upgrade to a high-risk lesion (6 lobular carcinoma in situ, 2 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasia), while none (0%) showed upgrade to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. One of 22 incidental radial scars (4.5%) showed upgrade on excision versus 6 of 36 (16.7%) for radial scars considered to be the radiographic target (P = .23). Older age was associated with upgrade (P < .001). Conclusions No incidental or small (≤5 mm) radial scars excised revealed invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ on excision. Provided there is good pathologic-radiologic concordance, it appears reasonable for these patients to be managed conservatively.

scholarly journals Questioning the Value of Evaluating Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors on Core Biopsy Specimens of Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Victoria Owens ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
Amanda Lynn Heiter ◽  
Elizabeth Garber ◽  
James Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Invasive Cancer ◽  
Invasive Component ◽  
Definitive Surgery

Purpose: To evaluate the value of estrogen and progesterone receptors on core biopsy specimens of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Introduction: The immunohistochemical determination of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status is predictive of the response of patients with invasive cancer to hormonal therapy. The value of the receptor status prior to definitive surgery with either breast conservation or mastectomy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and no invasive component is less clear. Methods: We identified through the tumor registry 344 patients with breast cancer diagnosed from 2014 through 2015. Two hundred seventy-seven patients had invasive cancer at diagnosis. Results: Of the remaining 67 patients with DCIS or atypical hyperplasia alone on core biopsy, 15 (22%) patients were found to have invasive cancer at the time of definitive surgery. Forty-six patients without an invasive component had definitive surgery at the study institution, of which three had a component of higher grade DCIS than on the core biopsy. Fourteen patients (30%) underwent a mastectomy. Conclusion: A significant proportion (29%) of patients with DCIS alone on core biopsy had either an invasive component at the time of definitive surgery or a higher grade DCIS component. An additional 14/46 (30%) of patients chose mastectomy, for whom consideration of adjuvant endocrine therapy for contralateral risk reduction did not depend on the receptor status of the index DCIS. Cost savings could be realized if the determination of ER is deferred until after definitive surgery. Determination of PR on DCIS specimens can be omitted entirely.

scholarly journals Predictive Factors of Residual Invasive Breast Cancer after Core Biopsy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja Seong Bae ◽  
Byung Joo Song ◽  
Dong Chul Kim ◽  
Young Jin Suh ◽  
Woo Chan Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Breast Cancer ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document