scholarly journals A decision rule with 7 clinical criteria identified patients with minor head injury who did not need computed tomography

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bloch
2010 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Osmond ◽  
T. P. Klassen ◽  
G. A. Wells ◽  
R. Correll ◽  
A. Jarvis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 190 (27) ◽  
pp. E816-E822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Osmond ◽  
Terry P. Klassen ◽  
George A. Wells ◽  
Jennifer Davidson ◽  
Rhonda Correll ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soheil Saadat ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi ◽  
Kourosh Holakouie Naieni ◽  
Kavous Firouznia ◽  
Mostafa Hosseini ◽  
...  

Object The aim of this study was to develop a decision rule for physicians in developing countries to identify patients with minor head injury who will benefit from emergency brain CT scanning. Methods Three hundred eighteen patients with a history of blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≥ 13 who had presented within 12 hours of trauma underwent nonenhanced brain CT and were included in this prospective study. Computed tomography findings that necessitated neurosurgical care (either observation or intervention) were considered as positive findings. Logistic regression was used to develop the decision rule. Results Computed tomography scans were always normal in patients < 65 years old who did not have an obvious head wound, a raccoon sign, vomiting, memory deficit, or a decrease in their GCS score. Patients with 1 major criterion (GCS score < 14, raccoon sign, failure to remember the impact, age > 65 years, or vomiting) or 2 minor criteria (wound at the scalp or GCS score < 15) had an abnormal CT scan in 13% of the cases. Conclusions The decision rule developed by the authors appears to be 100% sensitive and 46% specific for positive findings on brain CT and will, in developing countries, help clarify the decision to obtain scans.


Author(s):  
Christoph I. Lee

This chapter, found in the headache section of the book, provides a succinct synopsis of a key study examining the use of computed tomography (CT) scans for minor head injury using the New Orleans criteria. This summary outlines the study methodology and design, major results, limitations and criticisms, related studies and additional information, and clinical implications. The study showed that head CT scans for patients with minor head injury can be safely limited to those presenting with at least 1 of 7 specific clinical findings. In addition to outlining the most salient features of the study, a clinical vignette and imaging example are included in order to provide relevant clinical context.


2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet G&uuml;zel ◽  
Tufan Hi&ccedil;d&ouml;nmez ◽  
Osman Temiz&ouml;z ◽  
Burhan Aksu ◽  
Hakan Aylan&ccedil; ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1474-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward R. Melnick ◽  
Katherine Shafer ◽  
Nayeli Rodulfo ◽  
Joyce Shi ◽  
Erik P. Hess ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document