Cognitive–behavioural therapy can prevent transition to psychosis in ultra-high-risk participants in the long term

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. e10-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Miron ◽  
Amal Abdel-Baki
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Ultra High Risk

Long-term Effects of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Lithium Therapy on Depression in the Elderly

1995 ◽  
Vol 167 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. M. Wilson ◽  
M. Scott ◽  
M. Abou-Saleh ◽  
R. Burns ◽  
J. R. M. Copeland
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Lithium Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Depression Severity ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundWe examine the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) as an adjuvant to acute physical treatment and lithium maintenance therapy in reducing depression severity over a follow-up year in elderly depressed patients.MethodThe study consists of three phases. During the acute treatment and continuation phase, 17 of 31 patients received CBT as an adjuvant to treatment as usual. During the maintenance phase of 1 year, subjects were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of low-dose lithium therapy.ResultsReceiving adjuvant CBT significantly reduced patients' scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression during the follow-up year (repeated measures analyses of variance; P = 0.007). No significant differences were found between lithium and placebo maintenance therapy.ConclusionsCBT can be adapted as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of severely depressed elderly patients and reduces depression severity during follow-up. The prophylactic failure of long-term lithium therapy may be explained through poor compliance.

scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for personal recovery of patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. e100040
Author(s):  
Weiliang Wang ◽  
Yuqiu Zhou ◽  
Nannan Chai ◽  
Dongwei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Fundamental Aspect ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Personal Recovery ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

BackgroundTo date, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) trials have primarily focused on clinical recovery; however, personal recovery is actually the fundamental aspect of the recovery process. The aim of this study was to summarise and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of CBT for personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia.AimThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CBT for personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsA systematic search of the literature in PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Embase and Web of Science (SCI) was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials reporting the impact of CBT interventions on personal recovery in patients with schizophrenia. The estimated effect sizes of the main study outcomes were calculated to estimate the magnitude of the treatment effects of CBT on personal recovery. We also evaluated the CBT’s effect size at the end-of-treatment and long-term (follow-up) changes in some aspects of personal recovery.ResultsTwenty-five studies were included in the analysis. The effect of CBT on personal recovery was 2.27 (95% CI 0.10 to 4.45; I2=0%; p=0.04) at post-treatment and the long-term effect size was 2.62 (95% CI 0.51 to 4.47; I2=0%; p=0.02). During the post-treatment period, the pooled effect size of CBT was 0.01 (95% CI −0.12 to 0.15; I2=33.0%; p>0.05) for quality of life (QoL), 0.643 (95% CI 0.056 to 1.130; I2=30.8%; p<0.01) for psychological health-related QoL, −1.77 (95% CI −3.29 to −0.25; I2=40%; p=0.02) for hopelessness and 1.85 (95% CI 0.69 to 3.01; I2=41%; p<0.01) for self-esteem. We also summarised the effects of CBT on QoL (subscale scores not included in the evaluation of the pooled effect size), self-confidence and connectedness, and all results corresponded to positive effects. However, there was insufficient evidence regarding the long-term effects of CBT on personal recovery.ConclusionsCBT is an effective therapy with meaningful clinical effect sizes on personal recovery and some aspects of personal recovery of schizophrenia after treatment. However, the effect is relatively immediate and rapidly decreases as time progresses. Therefore, in the future, more studies should focus on the mechanism of CBT for personal recovery and the factors that influence the long-term effects of CBT.Trial registration numberCRD42018085643.

scholarly journals Long‐term benefits of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: Follow‐up report from a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie I. Luik ◽  
Antonia Marsden ◽  
Richard Emsley ◽  
Alasdair L. Henry ◽  
Richard Stott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

Treatment of Mixed Anxiety-Depression Disorder: Long-Term Outcome

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Echeburúa ◽  
Karmele Salaberría ◽  
Paz de Corral ◽  
Raúl Cenea ◽  
Tomás Berasategui
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Standard Drug ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
Depression Disorder

The aim of this paper was to test the long-term contribution of cognitive-behavioural therapy to the treatment of mixed anxiety-depression disorder. Fifty-seven patients, selected according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, were assigned to: 1) cognitive-behavioural therapy; 2) combined therapy (drug and cognitive-behavioural therapy); or 3) a standard drug therapy control group. A multigroup experimental design with repeated measures of assessment (pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-, 6- and 12 month follow-ups) was used. Most patients who were treated (71%) in experimental groups showed significant improvement at the 12-month follow-up, but there were no differences between the two therapeutic modes. No improvement was shown by the control-group participants at the 6-month follow-up. The results of the present trial do not support the beneficial effects of drug therapy by itself for this disorder. Finally, several topics that may contribute to future research in this field are discussed.

Long-term effects on income and sickness benefits after work-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy and individual job support: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 703-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Øverland ◽  
Astrid Louise Grasdal ◽  
Silje Endresen Reme
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Work Participation ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundThere is moderate quality evidence that integrating work-directed interventions and components from psychological therapies reduces sickness absence in the medium term. We aimed to extend this evidence by examining objectively ascertained income and work participation status up to 4 years after an intervention to improve outcomes among people who struggle with work from common mental disorder.MethodsThe intervention combined components from cognitive behavioural therapy with principles from supported employment, and compared its efficacy with usual care. Outcomes were derived from registry data with no attrition, in a pragmatic multisite randomised controlled trial (N=1193).ResultsThe intervention group had higher income, higher work participation and more months without receiving benefits over the 10-month to 46-month long-term follow-up period after end of treatment, but differences were not statistically significant. For the group on long-term benefits at inclusion, effect sizes were larger and statistically significant.ConclusionThere were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the primary outcome in the total population. In a secondary analysis for the subgroup most at risk of permanent work exclusion, long-term outcomes were favourable in the intervention group compared with usual care. The results support integrated work and health services for people on the severe end of work participation challenges.Trial registration numberNCT01146730.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document