scholarly journals Economic evaluation of mental health interventions: an introduction to cost-utility analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen Luyten ◽  
Huseyin Naci ◽  
Martin Knapp
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Interventions

scholarly journals Health economic measures in schizophrenia research

2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (S50) ◽  
pp. s42-s45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul McCrone
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis

BackgroundIt is essential in economic evaluations of schizophrenia interventions that all relevant costs are identified and measured appropriately Also of importance is the way in which cost data are combined with information on outcomesAimsTo examine the use of health economicsin evaluations of interventions for schizophreniaMethodsAreview of the key methods used to estimate costs and to link costs and outcomes was conductedResultsCosts fall on a number of different agencies and can be short term or long term. Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis are the most appropriate methods for combing cost and outcome dataConclusionsSchizophrenia poses a number of challenges for economic evaluation

An Economic Evaluation of Treatments for HIV-Associated Facial Lipoatrophy: A Cost-Utility Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirianong Peyasantiwong ◽  
Mona R. Loutfy ◽  
Audrey Laporte ◽  
Peter C. Coyte
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Facial Lipoatrophy

Cost–utility analysis of public health interventions

2019 ◽  
pp. 177-203
Author(s):  
Rhiannon T. Edwards ◽  
Eira Winrow
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Public Health Interventions ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

This chapter builds upon Chapters 2 and 6 by introducing the reader to the history and concepts of health-related quality of life, cost–utility analysis, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and payer thresholds. The aim of this chapter is to outline in more depth the role of applied cost–utility analyses in the economic evaluation of public health interventions. The chapter goes on to reproduce a paper by Owen and colleagues at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom. This paper shows that many public health interventions often have a cost per QALY considerably lower than the £20,000 payer threshold conventionally used by NICE in the United Kingdom.

Systematic Review and Critique of Methods for Economic Evaluation of Digital Mental Health Interventions

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Jankovic ◽  
Laura Bojke ◽  
David Marshall ◽  
Pedro Saramago Goncalves ◽  
Rachel Churchill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Mental Health Interventions

scholarly journals Economic Evaluations in the Canadian Mental Health System I: Theory behind Economic Evaluation*

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 633-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce J. Fried ◽  
Catherine Worthington ◽  
Raisa B. Deber
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Health Program ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Programs

Economic evaluation is becoming an increasingly important part of the evaluation of health and mental health services. Current models for conducting economic evaluation, including cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and cost-utility analysis, have great potential for improving the quality of decision-making and for making mental health programs more effective and efficient. This paper presents the basic economic theory underlying the various forms of economic evaluation and provides general guidelines for developing and conducting an economic analysis of a health program.

Economic Evaluation of CAM Use

2017 ◽  
pp. 232-271
Author(s):  
Li-Chia Chen ◽  
Mayuree Tangkiatkumjai
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Conventional Medicine ◽  
Kidney Diseases ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Interventions

Economic evaluation (EE) of health care interventions has been used to inform and affect policy decision-making by considering both costs and outcomes of the interventions. National guidelines in many countries consider cost-effectiveness evidence for making recommendations of healthcare interventions. In such case, EE of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is crucial to guide reimbursement decision-making. However, there is currently a lack of cost-effectiveness evidence of using CAM for kidney diseases. There are three types of full EEs, including a cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility analysis, of which, results of cost-utility analysis is preferred and widely used by healthcare authorities in several developed countries. General approaches for EE of conventional medicine are likely to be applied to assess economic outcomes of CAM for kidney diseases. This chapter depicts the overall principles of EEs, interpretations of economic results and summaries the currently available EE for CAM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document