Thylin - follow-up

1964 ◽  
Vol 2 (20) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Arthritis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Previous Therapy ◽  
Blind Comparison

Since we discussed nifenazone (Thylin - West Pharmaceuticals) last April (Drug & Therap. Bull. 2, 26) Hart and Boardman1 have reported a trial of the drug, the first published in Britain. They substituted nifenazone 750–2000 mg daily for phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone or salicylates in 26 patients with painful chronic arthritis, mostly rheumatoid. In 18 of these the symptoms became worse; 7 showed some benefit, but less than with the previous therapy, and in one the improvement was comparable with that obtained from phenylbutazone 300 mg daily. Various side effects e.g. dyspepsia, nausea, mouth ulcers, rash occurred in 8 of the 26 patients. In 10 further patients with rheumatoid arthritis a double-blind comparison was made between nifenazone 500 mg three times daily and placebo tablets. Two patients withdrew from the trial; among the other 8, symptoms improved in one, but 7 noted no change. Objective criteria showed no significant improvement. The results of larger trials of the drug, to be published next November, will be awaited with interest.

A Double-Blind Comparison of 0.25% and 0.05% Desoxymethasone, 0.1% Betamethasone Valerate and 1% Hydrocortisone Creams in the Treatment of Eczema

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Ashton ◽  
M. Catterall ◽  
N. Morley ◽  
G. Fairris ◽  
D. N. Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Betamethasone Valerate ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Blind Comparison

The efficacy and acceptability of 0.25% and 0.05% desoxymethasone, 0.1% betamethasone valerate and 1% hydrocortisone creams were compared in patients with eczema. A double-blind parallel group multi-centre design was employed in which 96 patients were recruited by four centres. Patients used one cream for a 3-week period and follow-up assessment visits were made at weekly intervals. Efficacy variables were: erythema/redness, scaling, itching and extent of area affected. These variables were assessed by both the investigator and the patient. The 0.25% desoxymethasone was the most effective treatment, producing the greatest degree of improvement in all clinical parameters, hydrocortisone was the least effective and 0.05% desoxymethasone was of intermediate effectiveness. The 0.1% betamethasone produced similar results to 0.25% desoxymethasone for half the assessments; for the other half the results were similar to 0.05% desoxymethasone. No adverse effects were reported during the study. The results are discussed in terms of physical properties of the vehicles and corticosteroid potency.

Double-Blind Comparison of Alclofenac and Aspirin in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

1974 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
S S Bedi
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Morning Stiffness ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Chronic Stage ◽  
American Rheumatism Association ◽  
Blind Comparison

In a double-blind short term cross-over study, designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of alclofenac, 500 mg thrice daily against aspirin, 866 mg thrice daily, fifty patients in a chronic stage of classical or definite rheumatoid arthritis (according to American Rheumatism Association ( 1959) criteria) were selected. The criteria of assessment included pain, function and morning stiffness. The patients' and physician's overall preferences and opinion on tolerance were also recorded. Forty-eight patients completed the study successfully. The study showed that both drugs were significantly effective in relieving pain but there was no difference between the two preparations and neither drug made any improvement to function or morning stiffness. The patients' and physician's preferences and opinion on the therapeutic efficacy were almost equally divided between the two drugs. However, the instances of side-effects were a little higher ( 44%) with aspirin than with alclofenac ( 34%). It appears from this study that in chronic rheumatoid arthritis the analgesic activity of 1·5 g alclofenac is equivalent to 2·6 g (approx.) of aspirin.

DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF IBUPROFEN AND PHENYLBUTAZONE IN THE SHORT-TERM TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Rheumatology ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. PAVELKA ◽  
A. SUSTA ◽  
O. VOJTÍŠEK ◽  
A. BREMOVÁ ◽  
D. KAŇKOVÁ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Comparison

Sulphadiazine/Trimethoprim Once Daily in Maxillary Sinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison with Sulphamethoxazole/Trimethoprim B.I.D.

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Federspil ◽  
Peter Bamberg
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Favourable Result ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Cure Rates

In a randomized double-blind study fifty-four patients suffering from acute maxillary sinusitis were treated for 10 days with daily doses of sulphadiazine/trimethopim (1 g) and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.92 g), respectively. The efficacy was evaluated clinically at two follow-up visits. X-ray investigations were performed at admission and after the therapy. Of thirty-nine patients finally evaluated, thirty-seven showed a favourable result. After 6–8 days of therapy there was significant difference in cure rates in favour of sulphadiazine/trimethoprim (p < 0.05) while the outcome as evaluated after treatment was similar for both drugs.

A Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Trial of Floctafenine and Four Other Analgesics Conducted in General Practice

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Lomas ◽  
J Gay ◽  
R N Midha ◽  
D L Postlethwaite
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
The Other ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Comparative Clinical Trial

Three hundred and twelve patients suffering from painful conditions were admitted to a multicentre, double-blind controlled trial, conducted in general practice in which five analgesics—floctafenine (Idarac), paracetamol, aspirin, dihydrocodeine and pentazocine—were compared. Overall ratings of analgesic effect placed floctafenine first in rank order. Floctafenine was statistically significantly superior in effect to pentazocine but not to the other three agents as far as doctor ratings were concerned; and superior to both pentazocine and dihydrocodeine in the opinion of patients. Fewer patients experienced side-effects on floctafenine than on the other four analgesics and this difference between floctafenine and pentazocine, and floctafenine and dihydrocodeine was statistically significant.

scholarly journals Topical Diltiazem Versus Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate In The Management Of Chronic Anal Fissure

JMS SKIMS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Shams Ul Bari ◽  
Ajaz Ahmad Malik ◽  
Khurshid Alam Wani ◽  
Ajaz A Rather
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Topical Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
One Year

Background: Chemical sphincterotomy is a novel way for treating patients of chronic anal fissure which avoids the risk of fecal incontinence associated with traditional surgical methods. Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the results of topical Diltiazem with topical Glyceril trinitrate in the management of chronic anal fissure. Methods: 71 patients in the age group of 15 - 61 years with chronic anal fissure were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial over a period of two years with further follow up for one year. The patients were randomly allocated to either Diltiazem gel 2% (37 patients) or Glyceril trinitrate ointment 0.2% (34 patients) and were asked to use the treatment twice daily for 8 weeks. Each patient was reviewed every two weeks. Symptoms, healing, side effects and recurrence were compared using SPSS version 10 employing X2 test. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Patients who received topical diltiazem (DTZ) showed statistically significant difference than those who were prescribed topical glyceril trinitrate in terms of symptoms, wound healing, side effects ( headaches) and recurrence (p=0.03 and 0.003 respectively). Healing occurred in 34 of 37 (92%) patients treated with Diltiazem after 6 weeks and 27 of 34 (80%) patients treated with Glyceril trinitrate after 8 weeks, which shows a significant difference in favour of Diltiazem (P < 0.001). The rest of the patients did not heal and underwent sphincterotomy (SILS). Headache occurred in all of the patients treated with Glyceril trinitrate but none of the patients treated with Diltiazem. Conclusion: Diltiazem gel was found to be better than Glyceril trinitrate ointment due to significantly higher healing rate and fewer side-effects. JMS 2014;17(2):55-58

DBS of the PSA and the VIM in essential tremor

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. e543-e550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Barbe ◽  
Paul Reker ◽  
Stefanie Hamacher ◽  
Jeremy Franklin ◽  
Daria Kraus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Essential Tremor ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Crossover Phase ◽  
Ventral Intermediate Nucleus ◽  
Frequency Of Stimulation

ObjectiveTo evaluate deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in essential tremor (ET) and compare it to the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) in terms of stimulation efficacy, efficiency, and side effects.MethodsDBS leads were implanted such that contacts were placed in the VIM, on the intercommissural line, and in the PSA. Thirteen patients with ET entered a randomized, double-blind crossover phase and completed a 1-year follow-up.ResultsPSA-DBS significantly reduced tremor severity and improved quality of life. There were no relevant differences in quality and frequency of stimulation side effects between VIM and PSA, with a tendency toward greater tremor improvement with PSA stimulation. Clinical benefit was achieved at significantly lower stimulation amplitudes in the PSA. The majority of patients remained with PSA-DBS after 1 year.ConclusionIn accordance with previous retrospective investigations, our prospective data suggest that PSA-DBS is at least equally effective as but possibly more efficient than VIM-DBS.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that for patients with essential tremor, PSA-DBS is not significantly different from VIM-DBS in suppressing tremor, but clinical benefit from PSA-DBS is attained at lower stimulation amplitudes.

A Double-Blind Comparison of Prazepam with Diazepam, Chlorazepate Dipotassium and Placebo in Anxious Out-Patients

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis F Fabre ◽  
David M McLendon ◽  
Arthur Mallette
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Check List ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Age Range

This study compared prazepam with diazepam, chlorazepate dipotassium, and placebo in the treatment of anxious out-patients. Patients were screened for participation in the study to be sure they met the criteria for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had complicating physical or mental problems. All patients signed an informed consent. Seventy-three patients entered the study, thirteen did not complete at least two weeks of treatment and were not used in the data analysis. Of these thirteen, ten did not return and were lost to follow-up, two entered the hospital for reasons unrelated to the drug study, and one patient on diazepam was terminated because of increased anxiety. Sixty patients were used in the data analysis, thirty-six males and twenty-four females with an age range of 21–61 years. Side-effects were minimal. Drowsiness was reported by two people in the placebo group, one taking chlorazepate dipotassium, three on prazepam and one on diazepam. One diazepam patient reported nausea and vomiting. Scores on the Zung Self-Rating Scale for Anxiety showed all three drug groups to be superior to placebo. The Hopkins Symptom Check-list found prazepam and diazepam to be superior to placebo and chlorazepate. No differences among the groups were found in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Prazepam may offer advantages over the other available benzodiazepines since it may be more readily absorbed than chlorazepate and has less side-effects than diazepam.

Isoelastic Cementless Total Hip Replacement in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Long-Term Results

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
U. Fusco ◽  
R. Capelli ◽  
A. Avai ◽  
M. Gerundini ◽  
L. Colombini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
The Other ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
X Rays ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cementless Total Hip Replacement

Between 1980 and 1987 we have implanted 46 isoelastic cementless THR in 40 patients affected with rheumatoid arthritis. We have reviewed 38 hips clinically and by X-ray. The mean follow-up was 8,5 years. Harris hip scores ranged from 30.6 preoperatively to 73,4 post-operatively when reviewed. While on the other hand Merle D'Aubigné hip scores ranged from 7,06 pre-operatively to 15,59 post-operatively. All patients have been satisfied, and X-rays showed an improvement for both Charnely and Gruen X-ray score.

A Double-Blind Comparison of Pentazocine-Paracetamol and Dextropropoxyphene-Paracetamol Compound Tablets

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
S G Flavell Matts
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Significant Preference ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
A Minor

In a double-blind cross-over comparison of two mild analgesic compound tablets patients in moderate or severe pain showed a significant preference for the pentazocine-paracetamol compound tablet. Side effects were of a minor nature only and no patient dropped out of the trial because of them. It is concluded that significantly more patients (p <0.01) prefer the pentazocine-paracetamol compound to the dextropropoxyphene-paracetamol compound.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document